Okay so what's the other plan? Go ahead and give us other ways to proceed.In post 2559, EeveeLution Army wrote:In post 2556, nomnomnom wrote:What do you mean "isn't gamewinning"? If you win this 1v1 as town, you force a NK on yourself and we end up in a 2 masons - 1 VT - 2 goons endgame. That's excellent chances for town.In post 2553, EeveeLution Army wrote:im decent at 1v1s tbh. but idt winning this 1v1 is gamewinning nomnom. since we have 3 people who can be scum left, meaning a 66/33 and 50/50 need to be won even if sky is lynched. im honestly heartbroken cause i wanted sky to be town. but it is impossible now.In post 2550, nomnomnom wrote:Like, the lack of interest in pushing a game winning scenario from your part makes me think that you are bullshitting, is what I'm trying to say. I don't know how you usually play but I've never seen a MD this disinterested in forcing a game-solve.
it isnt when the last game you were in was a 100% townwin that town choked in lylo
Right, so you're dumbtelling and blatantly misusing your role. Am I supposed to believe that? That you wouldn't check the only tangible claim left in the game at that point?EeveeLution Army wrote:n1 he hadnt claimed disloyal yet and i hadnt thought of confirming it since it wouldnt benefit.In post 2558, nomnomnom wrote:...Then why didn't you confirm it from the get go? As in night 1, night 2?
you also have to remember i was thinking he was neighbourizer. so i didnt wanna check him n2
You had plenty of opportunities to check that, and those excuses are honestly stinky.