Ectomancer:
Trying to come up with a system, defends Nocmen saying "I view Nocmen's question as a valid attempt to move beyond the random stage.".
If you do not believe this, why then would you ask Max about his comment on andersonw? If you were asking because you were trying to determine whether his comment was suspicious, what are you wanting to get from his response that would allow you to make that determination?
Interesting question that I hope Nocmen will answer.
Oman: 2 proper posts one giving no reasons for either me or nocmen being exclusively scum
opie:
Good posting so far no scum vibes here.
Why are you taking is so seriously at this point?
Nocmen gave a politicians answer to this question either he has something to hide or he is being indirect. Either way I want more from Nocmens answer.
Sarcastro:
Sweet Zombie Jesus, am I the only sane person here? What possible answer could Max give? It was the first post of the game. It is impossible for him to have any logical reason for voting for Anderson unless he (Max) is scum, which he obviously wouldn't admit.
:good posting:
t's not possible to create a combination of lists that would work that way. It would require the lists to be affected by who's scum and who's town. But given any list, we can figure out in advance, no matter who is scum and who is town, who will be left at the end of the game. So no, there's no possible way of breaking the game in that way. Given any combination of votes, there will always be someone who would win the game for the scum if he is scum.
More good posting
Shy Guy: One insane guy, definately a few newbie mistake maybe worth thinking about later but nothing serious now.
SpringLullaby: No read, 2 posts neither about finding scum
Thesp (N/A) (1 Post)
Van Damien (1 real post useless one at that)
Yosarian2: no bad vibes.
