lolRosso Carne wrote:i think flea quit the site.
Uhm no.
1 to 10, top to bottom.
Indeed. The Mafia only get a kill when we lynch correctly (that is, since they are infected, they will in turn, infect and kill a townie), in comparison to a "normal" setup when they get a kill regardless of who we lynch.skitzer wrote:Therefore, I think this game is strongly lienient toward the town, because even if we myslinch, the contagious townie has a second chance.
You have high hopes for Day 1...The Jester wrote:Definitely shouldn't lynch till now, as soon as we lynch someone the roller-coaster will start.
Trying to actively delay progress is not a pro-town action.The Jester wrote:We should devise a chart of sorts, who the top three most suspicious people are for each person and why. Hmmm.
I'm going to be blunt. "Rubbing me the wrong way" and "acting scummy" don't cut it. LET'S BE MORE SPECIFIC PLEASE.springlullaby wrote:My prime suspects are The Jester, Skitzer and Simenon, for rubbing me the wrong way, being the target of IM, and acting scummy respectively.
So what? If you are infected, you are dead. If you actually voiced reasons for suspecting others, then we'd be able to kill them off instead of you.springlullaby wrote:SSF, at L-1 of becoming infected, and thus of gaining the final say in who to infect next, I believe it is my prerogative as a townie to voice capricious suspicions which needn't obey to more than my fancy.
I refuse to give any added power to springlullably (or any other player, for that matter) without guaranteeing their death first. Else we're just negating the purpose of the game, aren't we?DrippingGoofball wrote:Your offer to self-hammer was townie-ish, under the circumstances. So why not let you pick?springlullaby wrote:DrippingGoofball, I'm puzzled, why do you want me to pick?
AlsoUnvote
Why? I do not believe self-voting is a pro-town action, and would think that a fair proportion of the town would agree. Why, then, would a wagon on an anti-town player be more likely to consist of a large number of opportunistic scum than a large number of who would be, from their own perspective "doing the right thing".Psychocide wrote:That, or if springlullaby commits suicide and turns up town like I think, then it makes sense that most if not all the mafia are/were on her wagon.
UA, The Jester. 1, 2.dahen wrote:I don't understand the meaning of this.
In games with mandatory deadlines, I like to take up as much of the available time as is useful. Discussion was still fairly active, I saw no real reason to cut it short.dahen wrote:What does "yet" mean in this post?
dahen wrote:This is an important point and very true.
At no point did I say or imply that this was false. I said this was a bad thing.springlullaby wrote:a) Whether we like it or not, this game is about autocracy, day one is only a brief respite.
This relies on the person making the decision to be:springlullaby wrote:b) Concept such as 'good tyrant' exists, having a good absolute ruler presents advantages and certainly leverage.
This is likely... why?dahen wrote:DGB: I guessed you would do something along these lines. Asking springlullaby to be specific and select one of the others. That will work if springlullaby is scum and lists two townies and a scum (which is likely) in her list and then selects a townie.
Knowing some of the personalities in this game, I am sorry to announce that the above is a very, very silly assumption.dahen wrote:Anyway I will assume that the majority opinion tomorrow at least will have some inpact on the coming choice of infections and use the common way of thinking.
Mod wrote:springlullaby -5.001-
Is the reduction in decimal places intentional?Mod wrote:Rosso Carne -3.01-
Ooh, I forgot to take deadlines into account when I dismissed the Mouse for today. You raise a fair point, the Mouse will probably break the ties, which makes how the Mouse's vote is determined more relevant.Psychocide wrote:@The Jester, looks like the mouse is just there as a deciding factor and tie breaker if we can't decide. So if we all vote for it, it'd probably infect one of us anyway.
Rest of your life, maybe. But yesterday, wespringlullaby wrote:Repeatedly discussing the merits of democracy is like repeating how truffles and pheasants are delicious when you are perfectly aware that you'll only be able to afford hotdogs for the rest of your life = irrelevant, unhelpful noise
OH MY GOD. YOU'RE RIGHT. HOW FOOLISHLY REPETITIVE OF ME TO HAVE A PRO-TOWN ATTITUDE WHICH ALL GOOD TOWNIES HAVE HAD BEFORE. CLEARLY, THE SMART MOVE HERE IS TO TAKE AN ANTI-TOWN, WHICH NO TOWNIES SHOULD HAVE, BECAUSE...springlullaby wrote:He thinks we should hit scum (how original)
You think I think I have lost this argument.springlullaby wrote:I think he has been arguing over that autocracy/democracy thing because he didn't properly think it through before aquiescing to someone else said and now have to save face.
Surely if my vote were something to do with a dislike of DGB's proposition, I'd have voted for... uhm... DGB maybe?springlullaby wrote:And I think he voted for me because of DGB's proposition.