Mini 543 - Election Day - Game Over!
-
-
Boggzie Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 413
- Joined: August 8, 2007
- Location: Columbus, Ohio
-
-
Boggzie Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 413
- Joined: August 8, 2007
- Location: Columbus, Ohio
-
-
Boggzie Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 413
- Joined: August 8, 2007
- Location: Columbus, Ohio
I'm sure you can't reply, but anyhow- I've been in two games now with SJ, and both times you've been killed off WAY early.Spider Jerusalem wrote:*Sigh* Why am I always without my bowl disruptor when it matters most *croaks*
::eyes folks that were in that last game::
pattern?
Happy Chrismahanakwanzika, everyone!
Akonas is worrying too early. This is just like the typical random voting in every game right now.Go Tribe!-
-
Boggzie Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 413
- Joined: August 8, 2007
- Location: Columbus, Ohio
-
-
Boggzie Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 413
- Joined: August 8, 2007
- Location: Columbus, Ohio
The question for now is, is mcpaltp really not that scummy to deserved the immunity? Still too early to tell though.[/quote]Rishi wrote:Immunity Count
*mcpaltp – 2 (Boggzie, ibaesha)
*Would receive immunity if polls opened today.
wait, wait, wait - That vote was random,unvote, because I've played with mcpaltp before and we had fun.
I don't like the implication this early that the vote was scummy.Go Tribe!-
-
Boggzie Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 413
- Joined: August 8, 2007
- Location: Columbus, Ohio
-
-
Boggzie Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 413
- Joined: August 8, 2007
- Location: Columbus, Ohio
opie wrote:I agree with you about Boggzie's post. I don't know if I would characterize it as an overreaction but it is rather confusing especially this line:
I just can't figure out what he's responding to here. Boggzie can you shed some light here?[i]In Post 78[/i] Boggzie wrote:I don't like the implication this early that the vote was scummy.
I disagree with you about Qman though. He's only posted three times. His first post his confirmation. His second post is a "check in" post. His third post he makes two insights on players which have been made by others and then he goes back to discussing how we should play the game well after we had moved on from that topic. What did you feel you got out of his posts.Unimmunity?
The i'net has been sketchy with the storms we've had. I'm not doing the whole "lurk" thing. If anything, I usually talk too much.
As far as my comment. Holy seemed to be implying the votes for mcpaltp were scummy, when I simply voted for him because we had played together before. I had planned to unvote when I saw he was replaced anyhow. It was troubling when we were essentially still in the "random" phase that someone would look at votes rather then comments, or reactions as a possible tell.
I'm having a lot of trouble playing backwards, which has also contributed to my being quiet. Like I'd like to FOmS Holy, but I haven't the slightest what effect, if any, it would have.Go Tribe!-
-
Boggzie Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 413
- Joined: August 8, 2007
- Location: Columbus, Ohio
No I didn't. Did you even read what I wrote?Holy wrote:Anyway, you unvoted unnecessarily in rush.
It was a random vote, and I tried to "unvote" using the wrong syntax as soon as he was replaced.boggzie wrote: I simply voted for him because we had played together before. I had planned to unvote when I saw he was replaced anyhow.Go Tribe!-
-
Boggzie Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 413
- Joined: August 8, 2007
- Location: Columbus, Ohio
I have already explained this, although I misstated; I would have unvoted once he was replaced anyway. You can easily look back and see when I layed the vote - it was random. Holy's statement was in the vein that he's "really not that scummy" meaning, to me anyway, that anyone that had laid a vote for him must be scummy to get their partner into an immunity role.farside22 wrote:
Wait a moment that is not how this started. Lets bring up the quotesBoggzie wrote:
No I didn't. Did you even read what I wrote?Holy wrote:Anyway, you unvoted unnecessarily in rush.
It was a random vote, and I tried to "unvote" using the wrong syntax as soon as he was replaced.boggzie wrote: I simply voted for him because we had played together before. I had planned to unvote when I saw he was replaced anyhow.
Rishi wrote:
Immunity Count
*mcpaltp – 2 (Boggzie, ibaesha)
*Would receive immunity if polls opened today.HolyThe question for now is, is mcpaltp really not that scummy to deserved the immunity? Still too early to tell though.Boggzie
Holy asked if mcpaltp deserved immunity, but your comment is a quick unvote thinking she is calling it scummie. She didn't call the votes scummie. However your second comment you stated that you voted for mcpaltp because he was a fun guy and was going to unvote after a bit anyways. So was it a plan from the beginning?wait, wait, wait - That vote was random, unvote, because I've played with mcpaltp before and we had fun.
I don't like the implication this early that the vote was scummy.
That's how I read it.
As I stated earlier, I am having a very tough time with this playstyle. I think I need torequest a replacement for myselfbecause I think I'm giving off the incorrect vibes as to my alignment, and not because of the game itself, but because I am unsure how to play it.
Sorry.Go Tribe!
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.