VOTE: Nahdia
Also why is the "user" button in the middle of the vote and unvote buttons ;_;
Do you think scum would have any way to work off that... soft? I mean, you must, since otherwise--In post 20, Nahdia wrote:I think Dunnstral may be [town] for highlighting what he thought was a soft in thread. Rather than, you know, taking it back to the scumthread and parsing what it may actually allude to.
I mean, he coulda done both, but my inclination is to think someone wouldn't bring up the same topic in two places. Maybe. I dunno. Maybe not.
there is something missing from this post can you spot it[/quote]In post 70, Staeg wrote:47-49 is burnworthy stuff
Dunnstral - why ask this of "SED" in particular? Did you expect him to have specific information on these "shenanigens"?In post 164, Dunnstral wrote:SED what do you think about these votecount shenanigens
Is the wk accusation the main reason why you're voting mollie?In post 103, Nahdia wrote:Yes. Me. Whiteknighting. On page 1. Of course. Yes. You got me.
SAD is a sad, grumpy man.
VOTE: pirate mollie
Is this important?In post 176, Nahdia wrote:you didn't roll the second R in heartbreaking!
To elaborate on this: dunny's play is inconsistent with information available to the town role he's softed.In post 189, Staeg wrote:Infinity wagon is good but dunnstral votes are better.
I did not >_>In post 199, drealmerz7 wrote:I think Staeg did alreadyIn post 195, Kagami wrote:Anyone want to claim non-turtle?
So these -In post 203, Dunnstral wrote:Because I didn't soft a role.In post 194, Kagami wrote:I don't see what role he's softed.In post 190, Staeg wrote:To elaborate on this: dunny's play is inconsistent with information available to the town role he's softed.In post 189, Staeg wrote:Infinity wagon is good but dunnstral votes are better.
I'm pretty sure drealmerz is town, by the way
In post 15, Dunnstral wrote:Get these votes off of me
- were not it? You're not one of the twenty people who shouldn't be voted?In post 17, Dunnstral wrote:I was just getting ready
Would you still say that you prefer Nahdia as a lynch to Dunn?In post 288, RedCoyote wrote:I get the sense that either Dunn/Nahdia are scum partners or that just one of them is scum. Something is not sitting right re: their interactions with one another. Both players appear very awkward when speaking about the other. Either because they are partners or because one of them is scum and is unsure how to best position themselves given the spotlight that has been trained on them. I'd encourage others to read over these last few posts and see if you get the same notions or if I'm just suffering from confirmation bias when I connect Dunn to Nahdia.
283 in particular just throws up all sorts of red flags.
Hmm okIn post 296, camntsuki wrote:Third,Staeg- I have some questions, and answers for you.We didn't ever think that. But Fate fucking with the VC, via Rolebased, RNG-based, or lol-based was all equally likely. It looks like it was sake-based though.In post 189, Staeg wrote:what lead you to believe that the VC thing was role-related and not another one of Fate's fanciful flourishes?
This is the only place where it is referenced as "Turtle Path". Upon reexamining some things I came to the conclusion that it's completely irrelevant, however.
What the FUCK is this?In post 395, drealmerz7 wrote:but would be more inclined to think he'd do it as scum, especially since he's been rolling scum a LOT and if he got scum this game he probably needs another element to keep his charisma and enthusiasm up and something like that would do it.
Heebie-jeebies from your repeated affirmations that you're town and people voting you are voting town.In post 422, Nahdia wrote:If you are town, mollie, maybe you should actually read the words and try to take some of it to heart. Because right now, you're voting a town with confidence and thus in major error. Learn from your mistakes, friend.
Ah right, that. What? There's some RVS in there, then there's the thing I responded to cupcake about already, then there's me targeting laser-sights on dunn, and then there's commentary on all the noteworthy things I could spot.In post 481, Infinity 324 wrote:Staeg I have to look into more. At first I thought he was fluffposting but then he stopped and there could've been some plan to all of it. I asked him about the seeming fluff early on and I'm waiting for an answer.
I was thinking more about the Path than the Turtle.In post 507, Kagami wrote:Btw, Staeg, from what I've seen here, turtle-ness is probably pretty important.
I'd be willing to bet our role names are of the form: <flavored rolename>, a <Turtle/scumflavor> Mystic.
Yours being that nacho's life and spirit is not in this game and that it's alignment indicative to the extreme?In post 1112, pirate mollie wrote:then listen to mine, I think it is likely that nacho picked up their was something going between dunn/dreamz and his push on dreamz was beyond bullshit as was your and rc's. you voted him for playstyle reasons but it is possible that is what you find scummy and nacho can usually parse the difference between playstyle and genuine alignment.In post 1111, Staeg wrote:Dunn's Nacho push is beyond bullshit.
the fact that hop to discredit dunn while ignoring my case but I guess that yesterday too is gross.
And no, if people are being pushed for reasonsIn post 1112, pirate mollie wrote:the fact that hop to discredit dunn while ignoring my case but I guess that yesterday too is gross.
Your engagement with other people has been superficial - your questions, whether they are answered or not, do not seem to affect anything. You didn't seem bothered by me repeatedly ignoring your requests for reads, for example, while I am conveniently sitting in a "leaning scum but can't really tell" position since... the start of the game, from what I can tell.In post 1182, Infinity 324 wrote:@staeg I don't think you ever explained your scumread on me. Can you do so?
Just that I didn't feel like answering would improve the day much.In post 1196, Infinity 324 wrote:But uh, was there a particular reason you ignored me or...?
And I'm not saying that you didn't have any. I'm saying that you didn't make any. The dude you voted for ended up not dying and the best you could muster is "why are you alive"?In post 1196, Infinity 324 wrote:I don't see where you got that I had no stances at the start of d2. Just because I didn't post them again doesn't mean they disappeared...
I disagree with this part. If it's a day 1 only thing they would definitely use it and then not claim it to send day 2 down the drain as well.In post 1200, Kagami wrote:and I still don't think they'd save Zito for WIFOM.
When'd you get it?In post 1211, Papa Zito wrote:I still need to read up but to answer the major question -
Yes and no. I had in my possession a tradable item called the "Talisman of Protection". I thought it just protected against nightkills but apparently it protected against kills of any type.
Have you read Spyrex's previous posts on the Zito topic?
Leaning town. I've liked your stances for pretty much the entire game, although I do not follow your tune beat for beat. I do not find your early d1 nonpresence scummy, either.In post 1261, Nachomamma8 wrote:Staeg, what is your read on me, mlem mlem? I don't believe that people getting pushed for bad reasons make them town and you're more than experienced enough to know that's not a real way to read someone, mlem mlem.
When did you come up with this theory?In post 1087, Dunnstral wrote:My theory is that scum started with at least 1 fragment so they'd know what's going on
The best? idk man. Why does it have to be the best?In post 1325, Infinity 324 wrote:You really think the best scum!dunn could come up with to justify a scumread on someone isIn post 1323, Staeg wrote:it signals that there is no better fuel to throw into the engine.that?
I feel like this argument is very rarely accurate.
In post 1347, Dunnstral wrote:How would you knowIn post 1336, Staeg wrote:Normally. I would say with some confidence that Dunn is not a ~normal player~ (whatever that is) and doesn't play by the book as either side.
dee doo dee doo dee dooIn post 1334, Staeg wrote:Dunn - before it's been outed in thread, jesus christ. At the start of the game. You've repeatedly stated that scum would need a piece of the orb to know what's going on. Do you still, after everything that's been said today, think that scum must have had a piece at game-start to be informed of the mechanic? Do you not see how that could matter?
meh.In post 1352, Infinity 324 wrote:What do people think about camn calling every one of my posts scum
Do you have anything else to add to the thread other than this?In post 1356, drealmerz7 wrote:elaborate as to why you think that is unlikely
No, it was actually nacho's role that interacts with orb fragments. Sadly, you caught onto our plot to gather the fragments all at once.In post 1362, Dunnstral wrote:So you were alerted that orbs exist in your pt? lolIn post 1360, Staeg wrote:that judgement is... wrong.
No, they're entirely separate from one another, and are quite unlikely to be scum together.In post 1368, pirate mollie wrote:the first part is a kiss ass post with wiggle room to disagree. I mean what stances do you agree with of nacho's? bullet point for me will ya?
so...I just wanna get this straight. you think...dreamz and dunn are scum together? that they somehow concocted this convoluted plan to both crumb early on d1, 1 being obvs and the other telling him to shut up...or...something?
and that both of them started off with an orb and dunn decided to give his away as some mastermind to confuse town only to snatch it back later and have more orbs which is why he hammered zito?
do you have any idea how ridiculous this sounds? and you actually have the nerve to throw shade on dunn cos it WAS kind of strange that nacho zeroed in on the 2 orb holders but somehow missed that they announced that they had them with a big neon sign.
I mean...do you think that dunn and dreamz decided that this was the super duper plan that *wld decimate town* and win the game against this playerlist?
I have no words.
What's infinity done to you, again?In post 1539, drealmerz7 wrote:you do all realize that I want to lynch nacho and infinity more than anyone, right?
Dreal this is 4 u.In post 1554, Staeg wrote:Right sure, but a quick iso of yours shows one quoted post of infinity's and some vague scumpings. Also I'm voting him. But I also want to vote you.
In post 1548, Staeg wrote:Faaaate: if there were hypothetical item-objects that could be passed from player to player, what position would that action take in the resolution?
Is there any difference between his unsure theorycrafting and yours besides tone?In post 1569, drealmerz7 wrote:this feels like probably scum trying to plant ideas in ppls minds (a lot of infinity's posts strike me as that)In post 1135, Infinity 324 wrote:Since most of d1
And what if scum!dreal doesn't have the orb but knows about it and is crumbing it to throw people off or to look town?