Mini 543 - Election Day - Game Over!

QuickBen · Post Post #15 (isolation #0) » Thu Dec 20, 2007 5:54 am

/confirm

QuickBen · Post Post #38 (isolation #1) » Wed Dec 26, 2007 6:37 am

Discussion is discussion. We can't really discuss who we think should have immunity without discussing who we don't trust with it and vice versa. Its not like we can't repeal immunity and change it if the person we choose starts acting goofy.

immunity: ibaesha

QuickBen · Post Post #40 (isolation #2) » Wed Dec 26, 2007 1:38 pm

Well that's true, but it takes a majority to open the polls anyway, so its not like they're going to open on us unexpectedly. I think it will be more interesting to keep the voting a secret until the mod tells us who voted for whom. Instead of scum getting to bandwagon with "me too" style votes, they'll have to either keep their votes spread out or give themselves up as a voting block. It will prevent them from acting with unity, taking away their major advantage. Closed voting will also give us LOTS to discuss the following day once we are given the voting record.

QuickBen · Post Post #73 (isolation #3) » Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:13 am

You did? Oh yeah, you did. Whoops.

I do think that Akonas is blowing things out of proportion. Not sure if the overreaction is a scumtell or just his playstyle though. Its been WAY too long since I've played, and I honestly don't have time to go read one of his games to metagame him.

Leaving my immunity vote on ibby for the moment.

QuickBen · Post Post #89 (isolation #4) » Fri Jan 04, 2008 2:22 am

@Akonas- Ok point taken. I actually forgot that we only get to vote once per day this game, so there isn't a time someone getting run up can claim. Don't know where my head was with that one. So yeah, that definitely gets my support for announcing who we plan to vote for before the polls open.

QuickBen · Post Post #151 (isolation #5) » Mon Jan 14, 2008 7:16 am

I'm around. I just have nothing to add, sadly.

QuickBen · Post Post #153 (isolation #6) » Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:42 am

TBH- I find opie's posts to be most disturbing. I realize he is one of the most prolific posters in this game, but his attack on the "lurkers" rubbed me the wrong way. Instead of just saying "I find the 5 people who posted the least to be scummiest," he could have merely asked direct questions to us to draw us into the conversation. Too often scum go after lurkers day one for an easy lynch. However, there really hasn't been much else to go on, so I can't fault him too much for lurkerhunting instead of scumhunting. Its not enough to make a case against him by any means, but since you're asking, he's my only lead right now.

QuickBen · Post Post #159 (isolation #7) » Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:59 am

It benefits the scum to lead the town in the same way that if you can't hold the gun, your next best thing is to fool the guy who is into thinking you're on his side. Yes that was what I was referring to. I said myself it wasn't enough to make a case. Rigel also seems to be having computer problems just for the record, and I'm looking forward to reading the content he promised before that post. I'm sorry you don't find my reason for not posting to be good enough, but when all's said and done, I just didn't have much to say. Sorry. I could have posted a few "me too" posts, but those aren't really my style either.

QuickBen · Post Post #187 (isolation #8) » Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:21 am

unimmunity, immunity Holy

QuickBen · Post Post #188 (isolation #9) » Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:24 am

Whoops, hit Submit, not Preview.

After her post, I feel comfortable giving immunity to Holy.

I'll probably vote opie.

QuickBen · Post Post #196 (isolation #10) » Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:38 pm

@akonas- gut feeling

QuickBen · Post Post #200 (isolation #11) » Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:26 am

QuickBen wrote:Whoops, hit Submit, not Preview.

After her post, I feel comfortable giving immunity to Holy.

I'll probably vote opie.

QuickBen · Post Post #267 (isolation #12) » Tue Feb 05, 2008 12:23 pm

What would you like me to weigh in on?