[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 850306 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Mini 535: Pick Your Poison 2 (Game Over!) - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #23 (isolation #0) » Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:16 am
Postby skitzer »
Vote: Godfather
This is simply the best choice for town, seeing how there may not even be a cop to investigate or a vig to kill.
Vote: 1-Shot Vig
The encryptor could be dangerous if we decide to massclaim. The Mafia could freely discuss how they wanted to split the claims between powerroles and town.
Post
Post #26 (isolation #1) » Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:31 pm
Postby skitzer »
On a more lax tone, I don't think I will stay sane as everytime I see Patrick I will immediately think Spongebob Squarepants. I am sorry if that offends you.
Post
Post #56 (isolation #3) » Fri Dec 07, 2007 11:22 am
Postby skitzer »
Ether, I think every scum game needs a random vote, unless there is a post limit or such...(funny how that applies to you, me, and Bookitty.) Anyway, I never did read through the votes for mafia perks, I guess I should do that now.
Post
Post #58 (isolation #4) » Sat Dec 08, 2007 5:23 am
Postby skitzer »
Yes, but I feel this game can live with one.
But now that I realize it: Ether, you voted for Bookitty because of random voting, and then you also noted the same point for me. I would think you would at least FoS both of us before voting to see if one did any more scumtells.
Post
Post #96 (isolation #11) » Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:27 am
Postby skitzer »
probably Weak Doc, because it is the worst role on there.
I would also think Vig, because more than likely the Vig would accidentally kill town, which would beneficial for Mafia.
The third one is a toss up. All these roles could be beneficial to the Town, so I'm not sure. I'd have to say Masonizer, because they don't do any actions during the night except talk.
I don't know why we would massclaim. Do we really ever know? When discussion slows, it is usually an advantage just to spark up conversation, but I don't see that here.
Post
Post #106 (isolation #13) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:43 am
Postby skitzer »
sorry, i was gone.
The way I see it, I just pointed out a possibility. It is very likely that scum did give us a weak doc. That was the first thing that came to mind when YS jumped bandwagons. I'd read that it's not very fun to have dumb roles, so I figured YS was purposely trying to get herself lynched. Plus, I misread the weak doc PM, and thought it stated "all protects will fail". I can see why that was scummy, now that you mention it.
@Porochaz I chose the one shot Vig because it was better than the other choices to me. I just don't think that an encryptor is a good idea. Roleblocker and rolecop were just plain not good chocies. Because the scum are talking during the day now, they can point out things to each other that they may have forgotten during Night.
Post
Post #111 (isolation #14) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:26 am
Postby skitzer »
I think the big tizzy between you and Bookitty was just that, a tizzy. It just seemed to be a big misunderstanding/argument, I don't think either is scum right now, though this is something to be noted.
Post
Post #118 (isolation #15) » Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:39 am
Postby skitzer »
Bookitty wrote:Skitzer, do you think it's a protown action to identify and point out a town powerrole when you think you've spotted one? Why or why not?
I meant to point out that there is a possibility she isn't scum and we shouldn't jump to conclusions.
Post
Post #145 (isolation #20) » Tue Dec 18, 2007 10:44 am
Postby skitzer »
I thought a weak doc was like a miller in the fact that it wasn't helpful to the town. I thought weak docs failed whenever they protected anyone.
In Green Liquid's How To Mod V2.0, he mentions that it if a player doesn't like the role they have been given they may try to get themselves lynched, and that was what I felt, until I read through the role PM.
Post
Post #159 (isolation #21) » Fri Dec 21, 2007 9:14 am
Postby skitzer »
I'm not exactly sure how to post after this...I think everything I've said so far accounts for everything. I'm not exactly sure what to add. Currently my suspicions are on thedragonsprincess, for weirdish lurkying.
Post
Post #198 (isolation #23) » Mon Dec 31, 2007 9:14 am
Postby skitzer »
Jordan, to recap your explanation:
I thought universal conversation would be more powerful to scum instead of one more kill. Maybe when nearing the end game, yes, that would be extremely powerful, but if we as a town played efficiently, we wouldn't have to worry about that threat. Plus, the vig vote didn't even count because it was nullified after the Godfather was chosen.
I did not vote for Ether because I felt it just wasn't a big enough reason. I don't vote unless I have an extremely good reason.
The weak doc thing was definitely stupidity, and to sum it up: at that time, I thought YS's play was strange.
I hadn't posted because I didn't have much of anything to go on. Right now, Ether makes me somewhat suspicious due to his spontaneous suspicion of Mizzy.
Post
Post #208 (isolation #24) » Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:53 am
Postby skitzer »
Ether: I'm sorry. HER. Anyway, I approve of your explanation of Mizzy. Using innuendo hinting at "I'm town". Is simply repetitive to me, because everyone in tis game is town until proven scum, IMO. Saying "I'm town" is like saying "I'm alive", because everyone in the game wants everyone else to believe they are town.
Post
Post #215 (isolation #25) » Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:10 am
Postby skitzer »
Mizzy: I sometimes unintentionally skip over things when I'm reading. And I never voted. I FoSed because it was not a point of my own doing. I'll vote when I have a good reason to state.
Also, you had one vote from Ether, so even if I would have voted, two votes is not a bandwagon on day 1.
