whoot whoot.
I forgot how awful the grimdark edgelord default background was.
Hmm ima just call you dave.In post 73, ScumDeersAreVeryTasty wrote:What is up with this empty vote?
VOTE: algebra
And you can call me deer those who feel my name is long
His name isnt 'dave'In post 73, ScumDeersAreVeryTasty wrote:call me deer those who feel my name is long
In post 86, shaddowez wrote:Nobody likes that guy, this is a good place for a vote.
Deer- is your question in 73 serious, or were you just using it for RVS?
In post 85, Jackel98 wrote:VOTE: Drealmerz
There are too many yinyang avatars. Also, just, why?
Also, I haven't played with you before. Your pronoun says he, but you said she.
DoneIn post 101, Pine wrote:Can various hydras put their heads in their sig? Sick/Piss I know because obv but I'm forgetful
I will agree but also disagree. i dislike the actual doing of RVS but how else are you going to get things started. The goal of RVS isn't necessarily simply to catch scum (although catching scum is obviously not a bad thing) The main goal of RVS is to get things moving and tonal reads developing and everything moves on from there.In post 50, 1 Shot Vanilla Town wrote:No one actually gives a shit about the no lynch blah blah as it won't happen and neither does anyone really care who votes for who in RVS.
All people want is a reason to move on and try sorting the game, I think I saw RVS actually help find scum once in my entire time. Stop pretending that it's anything more than that.
I dislike the saying "but I'm a terrible scumhunter I could be wrong"In post 111, Creeps20 wrote:I had no idea what contrived was and it was this.In post 108, Pine wrote:Actually, srs vote
VOTE: Creeps
There's been a good deal of voting on principle against bad play, but that doesn't look like pigheaded prissiness (which my vote on 1SVT could fairly be called), it looks contrived.
(contrived
kənˈtrʌɪvd/Submit
adjective
deliberately created rather than arising naturally or spontaneously.
created or arranged in a way that seems artificial and unrealistic.)
It is safe to say that I am a terrible scum-hunter. As such it probably would look like that. I think
...In post 109, McMenno wrote:go on sickandpissed go on
ride away into the night
and with night I mean dead
and with ride I mean getting roped up
In post 120, SickandPissed wrote:I did *not* touch Creeps. Hes being a nerd rn; let him
In post 126, drealmerz7 wrote:number additions are mine:
You're here spoil the party, aren't you? Let's string this motherfucker up with some CHRISTMAS LIGHTS!!! he goes on with this shit after it's been said "just drop the NL shit"In post 104, SickandPissed wrote:In post 50, 1 Shot Vanilla Town wrote:No one actually gives a shit about the no lynch blah blah as it won't happen and neither does anyone really care who votes for who in RVS.
All people want is a reason to move on and try sorting the game, I think I saw RVS actually help find scum once in my entire time. Stop pretending that it's anything more than that.1.)I will agree but also disagree. i dislike the actual doing of RVS but how else are you going to get things started.2.)The goal of RVS isn't necessarily simply to catch scum (although catching scum is obviously not a bad thing) The main goal of RVS is to get things moving and tonal reads developing and everything moves on from there.
I dislike the voting for a no lynch, not only because it is bad, but because of his reasoning. His argument is that he dislikes RVS and it doesn't get anything done,3.)but neither does voting for a no lynch., when in fact the same number of mislynches will be needed regardless of a no lynch or not.It withholds flips from the town
I agree that I don't like staying in RVS, i usually like to get out of it as soon as possible. But i dislike the circumstances around 1shot's no lynch, and thus deserves my personal finger of suspicion.
1.) what do you agree with?
2.) necessarily simply? catching scum in RVS? huh? it just sounds like you're blabbing, making it sound like you're talking about shit that matters, and it doesn't, scumpoints
3.) sure it did it got reactions of varying degrees from multiple people
voting for no-lynch witholds flips???? to me all of this just reads as scum in the mentality of "make this seem as bad as possible and try to get him lynched for it" - voting no lynch doesn't do anything to flips - actually achieving no-lynch is what you mean, and a single beginning of the game no-lynch vote doesn't even COME CLOSE AT ALL to achieving no lynch - liiiiike, what is the deal? fake fear through and through, trying to stir over-reactions, is my read
you dislike the circumstances around the no-lynch vote? what does that mean, exactly?
In post 161, Win or Lose We Booze wrote:lol scum dont have to read the thread because they already know everyones alignmentIn post 160, Zachstralkita wrote:In post 155, McMenno wrote:
his postshis exchange with drealmerz (didn't read it ain't nobody got time for that)he's the largest wagon currently
how do u dislike something you didnt read
~GE
In post 365, Pine wrote:VOTE: SickPiss
Yeah, I'm done with this. Everything I'm seeing coming from these guys is least common denominator, low-hanging fruit kind of stuff. Lots of cheap shots and empty calories. If I'm honest, the post diarrhea and constant unrepentant hydra slipping doesn't help.
In post 368, Pine wrote:Wtf are you talking about? I don't know what game you're referring to. The accusation of voteparking is kind of left field and plays into the cheap attacks I'm talking about. If I wanted to votepark, I'd have just kept my vote on Creeps. It was (and is) justified, and I could easily "forget" to move it. Instead, I'm calling out a difficult target with no real support on my side. Kinda the opposite of a safe votepark.
In post 370, Pine wrote:Nonsense.
The algebra wagon is stupid. It has no real basis. The only good reason would be the self-vote, and we're all doing silly things in jest in this thread. That's part of why you're so off-putting, because you're throwing out crappy attacks a mile a minute instead of being methodical.
And what the fuck game are you talking about where we played together? I don't recall any significant interaction between us.
In post 373, Pine wrote:I'd forgotten about that because I only posted a handful of times, got way behind because you dicks were shitposting a lot, and replaced out. Kind of lame to use that against me.
In post 388, Pine wrote:Eh, that's kinda NAI for me. I'm usually hyperactive as scum. My Towngame is pretty weak, especially D1.
dang. I bet your sick of that.In post 396, shaddowez wrote:Had a sick wife and two sick kids yesterday, catching up now.