Thanatos wrote:<1>d<12>
Mini 530: Guitar Hero Mafia: It's Finally Over
-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
Haschel Cedricson wrote:Code: Select all
.N .. DDD... .DDNDNDN..ONNNNNNDD . ..... . ....? . N. ,:. .~DN7 . ..DDDDDNDNDDNNN8NDDNDDDNDDNZIN+ N, . ~NN...:~MDDD$:..,ND, .. .. :ND ND .,8MD .D. .IMM :=, .,NDNNNDOOOOOO .=D888D~. .8=..?DD. ~N .N. .ZMN,~~==N. ~7O. =I77??N =NNDO =. =ND ~DD ,M8 . NN. ,ZNDDDDDDN ..+D. ~ND..~MN =N=. =MN. =MD ~DD=..8N :DDO ,ZD$. ~M. +N. ~NN .=MN =DN =MD. =ND .~. :+MM ,N. ,ZNN ~$M. +N. ~MN .=MN =NN .,NN. =DD = ~NMN. D+ ,$MM .=$N. .+N. ~MD .=MN =ND .~$. =DD ~O..=ND NO ..=MN .=IN8 .~N. ~MD .=MN =ND .=DN .=DD ~D? ~$N. NO =MN .=$NDND~ ~MD.,~8N =NN =DD. =N,===MN: = NO .,~==, .=NN~. ?NNNZ~NDDDD.===INMD$$N .=MMMNNDDD . .N$=ZMMMMN= =MNZ .:8NDD7DD?====++I8NN$NNDN.+DDNDO.~ .NNM7... N =MNNO .=NNDN7 ,MDN8 ,,. .=MDI~.. . MDDND ND.. NM.=MD$NO =N:. :,. =D~ .?ND..=M= . ~=? 8N. ~ :D.$N,=MDO =M~..=DD. =N~..+NN..~M+ =MM =8D D,M$ .=MDO =M~..=ND .=D~..?D~. ~D+ =MM =8D DN8 =MNO =M~..=ND .=D~.....~MMN. =MM =8D NNDO. =N... =M~..: =?NN~..I..=MNN. =MM .=+MD .7 .D. . =M~..:~MMDDN~..I =NND= =MM =+ND N ~NNO =M~..=DNN.=M= +D =MN= =MM =MD N .=MDO =M~.., . =N~..?DD =DD+ =MM =MD. .N =MDO =MNDDI =ZNNN.=~=NN, =N~ .=NN =MN. N .=MDO =M8.:NDMNDDDDDNDNDN .IND?.. ...==MD. .D =MD,~=~=~N8..ND ... 8N. +NDD,.~=MNMM ,D =MNDDNNNNDNNN . . D+.====~MN . . ... .D88MMNNNDM$,. .OD8O+.. .
Okay, That's just awsome.Just because your paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
It's not uncommon to vote the rocker who just voted you if it's in the random voting stage. I agree that his logic sucked, but as much as it seems like it at first, it's not a scum tell.DeliciousGoldfish wrote:I really wasn't sure how you'd react to my vote on you but....... your reaction isn't sitting well with meJust because your paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
This random voting is getting us no where, and with the lack of posting, I'd say we need more information.
ChaosOmega, why did you vote DeliciousGoldfish because he was "not being serious" about his vote? No one had been serious about there vote yet, this is the random voting stage.FOS-IGMEOY ChaosOmega.Care to share your thoughts on the vote?Just because your paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
ReallyHaschel Cedricson wrote:
Really now?Natude wrote:(Still Here. Still have nothing to comment about.)Reallyreally?reallyreally.
I don't see anything worth posting/asking about, so I just say I'm still here so as not to be accused of lerking. (It could still be considered lerking, but less likely.)Just because your paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
Okay, this is just too much. The last two posts were okay, but Ireallydon't like post 142/143.
It seems d3sisted is eather stuped town, or poorly playing scum. Eather way, you better get your act together fast.d3sisted wrote:Thanatos was the first one to accuse me of putting an L-2 pressure vote. Lynch the obvscum.
Unvote; Vote: Thanatos
I cmpleately agree with that, but I close to voting anyway.Thanatos wrote:However, it's a policy of mine that L-2 is never to be reached in a pressure vote. In a big game, L-3. You stepped over that line, and I voted you.Just because your paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
Sorry about the "not saying a damned thing" bit, but I really don't see anything that looks all that scummy (other than what I said in post 148), and I don't like saying things just for the sake of saying things.Haschel Cedricson wrote:Things I don't like:
* Natude being very noncommittal. The last post was a good start, but I'm very surprised it took him as long as it did to comment about d3sisted, and he kept sayiung he had nothing to discuss shortly after I had presented a possible case against hasdgfas that he could have agreed or disagreed with.
I'll try to post a bit more content, but don't blame me if it doesn't really get us anywhere.Just because your paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
(This quote is geting way too long...)Cole wrote:
Now that's an interesting thing to say..Natude wrote:
ReallyHaschel Cedricson wrote:
Really now?Natude wrote:(Still Here. Still have nothing to comment about.)Reallyreally?reallyreally.
I don't see anything worth posting/asking about, so I just say I'm still here so as not to be accused of lerking. (It could still be considered lerking, but less likely.)
Why would you be worried about being accused of lerking? Do you have a guilty conscious? Is it because you are scum?
I'm worried about being accused of lerking because I've been lynched for it as town in the past. That and I find lerking suspisious myself.
I don't want to do what I don't like other people doing.Just because your paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
You just quoted me on something where I admit I'm lurking. What am I suposed to do? I can't see anything we might be able to work off.ChaosOmega wrote:You keep saying you're worried about "lurking", but you're still doing it; it's just active lurking.
I'll work with perfect628, but just becouse have nothing better to use.
perfect628, I want to have your thoughts on this by thursday or I'm going to vote.Just because your paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
Vote: d3sistedfor reasons stated in post 148.
Sorry guys, I just don't really see anything else scummy.
I think I'll just post when ever I see somthing I don't agree with, or I findslightlyscummy. It's better than what I'm doing now.Just because your paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
I don't think I've accused anyone of lerking thus far. I even admit that I'm lerking. Mabey you just misinterpreted my posts, I won't hold it against you.DeliciousGoldfish wrote:But Natude really got to me with his calling others off for "lerking" even though every one of his posts were just a bunch of useless words talking about other people's "lerking." Natude was in fact, quite the lurker: nothing to say, gonna post, got nothing to say, he's "lerking", i don't have anything. LAME.Just because your paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
Okay, this was a lerk accusation, (must mave missed that.) but it was on page 2, cole hadn't posted ANYTHING yet, (not even "hi") and I didn't know I'd come out with nothing to post eather.ChaosOmega wrote:
Alright. How about these:Natude wrote:I don't think I've accused anyone of lerking thus far.
Natude wrote:FOS Cole for not posting yet.
This wasNatude wrote:with the lack of posting, I'd say we need more information.nota lerk accusation.
This could be called a lerk accusation, but I thought prods were to make sure people were still there...Natude wrote:Can we get a few prods here? It's been too long since some of the players have posted, and not just ChaosOmega.
The heck? How is this a lerk accusation?Natude wrote:(Still here, still not seeing much.)
This was much like #2, but to a greater extreme.Natude wrote:We don't have nearly enough information for a dead line, but we NEED to start posting here. We're on page 5 and we still have nothing to work off. It's driving me crazy!
#1 mabey...Directly, no, you really haven't accused anybody.
I've been saying I'll try, that's the best I can do.And I know you've said you haven't seen anything to comment on, but you should find something. I just don't like the fact that you've openly admitted to lurking, but are angry at people for doing the same.Just because your paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
That was a good catch, but I just did a quick reread and I think it's really the only thing supporting your pair.Haschel Cedricson wrote:At the moment, I'm starting to postulate that you and d3s are scumbuddies and you're trying to save him from today's lynch by getting attention onto Natude.
DeliciousGoldfish wrote:hasdgfas: Good catch on d3sisted. Maybe ChaosOmega and d3sisted are scum! Wouldn't that be nice to catch 'em both so quickly...
These are reasons why this is not a pair.DeliciousGoldfish wrote:And I definitely do NOT believe that there even is a jester. That was a joke about how d3sisted is still making scummy moves so early in the game...
I'll try to do a better reread tomarrow and spell out my suspisions.Just because your paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
Okay, I just did a reread, and will try to break down my thoughts on the players.
My thoughts: Pro Town
My thoughts: 40/60 Pro Mafia
My thoughts: Leaning Town
My thoughts: Pro Town
My thoughts: Leaning Town
My thoughts: Toss Up
My thoughts: 60/40 Pro Town
My thoughts: 60/40 Pro Town
My thoughts: Leaning Mafia
My thoughts: Leaning Mafia
My thoughts:Vote: d3sistedJust because your paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
I'm glad that we're back on track. It'll be nice to get the game moving again, and we seem to be getting more information now.
Sweatpants, Dark, thanks a lot for filling in. We really needed more posts, and you guys might have saved the game.
Thanks ^.^Just because your paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
I am facing three different emotions right now.
1: I agree with hasdgfas' post #248
2: Other than post #248 I like Seraphic's case
3: I'm always influenced more by really long posts, so I don't know what to think.
I'llunvotefor now to see how this plays out. I think it will help me make a better decision.Just because your paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
I like Haschel's post 280, and I like SM's defense. What Idon'tlike is SM putting so much emphasis on what a stretch the motives were.
It's a perfectly logical idea, and it seems like it could easily be true. SM's defense was a good one, but it doesn't seem entirely truthful. I do, however, think that SM's defense nullifys Haschel's last two quotes.
SM's emphasis on the motives being a stretch is what really doesn't sit well with me, but after all the cases on DG, I think she's the best vote.
Vote: DeliciousGoldfishJust because your paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
-
-
Natude Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 17, 2007
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.