I would Discard it, because I don't have confidence enough to believe I wouldn't just be committing suicideIn post 13, farside22 wrote:VOTE: Trickster fate
I can't imagine a pro-town player getting rid of that role.
VOTE: shadow
I would Discard it, because I don't have confidence enough to believe I wouldn't just be committing suicideIn post 13, farside22 wrote:VOTE: Trickster fate
I can't imagine a pro-town player getting rid of that role.
Does this go for scum and town? Or are you just talking to town? Or just scum?In post 20, McMenno wrote:okay, I want to make one thing clear here:
DO NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, TARGET ME AT NIGHT
that is allVOTE: Shadow_StepIn post 19, Vedith wrote:VOTE: McMenno
VOTE: Titus
VOTE: lane0168
VOTE: farside22
Okay, I found scum!
I would like an answer to this as well
That's true, it's also a terrible role for someone who picked scum, someone coming off a scum win feeling a little corky? Mmm?In post 36, farside22 wrote:In post 23, eagerSnake wrote:What's up with the unprovoked softclaim?In post 20, McMenno wrote:okay, I want to make one thing clear here:
DO NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, TARGET ME AT NIGHT
Back to Lane's comment.
The reason I said what I did is if you have the role all you have to say is I plan on shoot x day 1 and if I die know that he/she is town.
In post 74, Eggman wrote:This is false and you know it.In post 47, Vedith wrote:No, I believe all roles are from page 1 only.In post 45, McMenno wrote:more than 100, actually
I want to lynch Vedith to remove those extra votes from play. It's too much power for one townie.
VOTE: Vedith
PEDIT: what the shit i've hit the submit button five times as of now
everone STOP POSTING SO MUCH. thanks
You mean his Discard? Yeah, why?In post 121, farside22 wrote:In post 73, Titus wrote:Docs do suck. I basically single handedly won as a hider in this. I cannot see why anyone discards compulsive mafia killer.
Now that Farside unvoted
VOTE: SSme, meIn post 76, lane0168 wrote:I could be way off though. Anyone else think titus would pick scum?
Did you know that SS didn't pick the card that Titus was referring to in the post she voted for him?
SameIn post 135, Vedith wrote:SameIn post 130, Shadow_step wrote:sameIn post 127, McMenno wrote:not that it matters, because I got all town cards :/
Then someone can confirm itIn post 155, Vedith wrote:No. I was only given that information.In post 154, Titus wrote:Did the mod list what anti-town factions there possibly are?
Did the mod define protective role?
I assume that someone sent me it pre game
I was responding to verity, but somewhere along the way I got that same thing in my head
Well I doIn post 233, Vedith wrote:Because I have a gut feeling!In post 232, lane0168 wrote:Not me! Not yet! Why is he scum though? Buddying and jester fear?
I think Ryan is lying, but I don't think scum now.
I feel like this is something I would say as scumIn post 264, Vedith wrote:I feel like this is something I would say as scumIn post 263, eagerSnake wrote:I feel like this is something I would say as scum
HAHA! Thought this was general knowledgeIn post 271, Vedith wrote:You realise that Lane can't be scum by default right?In post 270, eagerSnake wrote:Well you just said it so that makes you scum by your own logic
It's in the site rules.
He's basically a more power Innocent Child in every game.
What? Yes you areIn post 278, Vedith wrote:I'm not even voting him, how do I want him dead?!In post 276, Eggman wrote:why are you trying to kill McMenno now. You don't even have anything on him!
See, that's why I want this quadvoter out. #MennoDidNothingWrong
Too scummy to be scum is not settle meta. And you know I'm town. Don't be ridiculous. You're scumIn post 456, Vedith wrote:People self meta all the time, it's not actually an issue.In post 453, lane0168 wrote:VOTE: vedith
I've seen the too scummy to be scum defense used on other people, and be completely wrong more often than not. I've never seen it used in oneself. That's absurd
I will confirm again - I have 4 votes, I cannot be scum.
Thank you. Was just going to do thisIn post 473, Radical Rat wrote:Searches for "truth" "truths" "lie" "true" and "false" have turned up nothing.
Just because I think you made it up doesn't mean some of it couldn't be true.In post 150, Vedith wrote:To confirm, I received this information pre game
There is 1 anti town faction
Farside is not Mafia (My assumptions mean town)
There is 1 protective role in the game.
It was a message form the mod without anything else backing it.
Oh why I checked Titus and not vedith. I thought about checking vedith, but I also thought that's exactly what he was hoping for. Titus was my second best optionIn post 534, Radical Rat wrote:We had no reason to doubt your information until we got two scumflips from different factions though. At the time of N1, checking you was much less mandatory.In post 532, Vedith wrote:Lane is scum btw. He votes me and thinks my information received is a lie, yet he checked Titus last night?
Doesn't match up.
Happy to lynch Lane over Eggman.
No, that's not the one you were thinking. You were thinking of a role that sends 2 truths and a lie. The role that you found by now can't find, and are now saying it doesn't exist.In post 467, Vedith wrote:Also, I've been thinking about my information gained, and I'm starting to think that who ever sent it had to send 2 true comments and 1 lie.
Farside and 1 protective role is true (no one claimed another protective and I can't see anyone here as it)
The factions is a lie.
I found the role in the forum that does this, so I assume that someone got this and is scum.
Then why are you playing so ridiculously?
There's a bit of me that wants to believe this. A large bit actually. It's just. So. HardIn post 593, Vedith wrote:I am actually town btw, just trying to have a little fun. :<In post 584, Radical Rat wrote:Dayvig falls under "other shenanigans"
Keeping him alive, while fun, is not exactly playing my wincon, sadly.