I hate you
Shut up
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAPeers wrote:Because 'jokes' like that hurt the town -- the best solution is to get rid of the person behind the joke andhope he realizes it's a problem so they won't do it the next game.Since UA was behind the jokewagon, he got the vote.
and by 'both of you' do you include yourself? Cus you've been doing it all game, pal.Peers wrote:We all know you like to twist words around to try and make people look scummy. And by 'you', I mean 'both of you'
I also dont like your continual use of phrases such as "We all know you like to..." and "But then, you know that..."Peers wrote:UA may just be trying to protect himself with that "Oh, I always do this" 'joke'
Again, you say someone has said something, when in fact, they did not.Peers wrote:He's not voting for you based on membership in Team Asshat. He's voting for you based on that fact that you are, in fact, a total asshat.
Unright NEVER SAID ANYTHING in that post to come anywhere close to the conclusion you did. You sure are manipulative for someone who doesn't like to chaff people's scumdars.Unright wrote:Gosh. You're right.Flameaxe wrote:Anyone who thinks that Team Asshat means anything in this game WHATSOEVER needs to go to their roof, and jump off so maybe the impact will spark one small ounce of common sense in your brain.Flameaxe wrote:Team asshat has nothing to do with this game, don't make like it seem like it does.My Asshat partner and I will determine when it will be necessary to make that change.Hope your insurance is good.Flameaxe wrote:@dybeck: I bet you can't wait.I can assure only greatness from TAsshat in this game.
In what way did Flameaxe distract the town from its scumhunting duties? Did he bring up the Team Asshat issue? No. Did he whine about some bandwagon made during the random vote stage? No. Who did these things? Peers and Unright did. Who voted for Flameaxe for absolutely no reason in less than an hour? Peers and Unright did.Peers wrote:you're a poor town player who distracts the rest of us from finding scum
READ! I did not say you brought it up. I said we dropped it a long long time ago, and yet you people continue to try building cases based on it. You're wrong.Unright wrote:*shrug* Flameaxe is the one who brought up the whole "Team Asshat" thing first on Page 2. The "random voting" stage isn't a magically seperate part of the game. It's not like I brought it up out of nowhere. If Flameaxe hadn't brought it up, I wouldn't have.
Actions? As in more than one? I remember him defending the self-vote-urned-wagon, but what other defense has he mounted for me? None. Thats what the whole thing is about. You're once again taking a little thing that happened in the first page of the game and blowing it out of proportion.Unright wrote:But the fact of the matter is that he's gone out of his way to defend your actions
If it amuses us to call attention to Team Asshat in the opening stage of the game, we will. It amuses us. Its fun. Thats why we do it in the portion of the game where hilarity is supposed to ensue.Unright wrote:My point is that if Flameaxe truly can't handle having a fellow "non-mafia team member" in the game without calling attention to it, then maybe he should ask for a replacement.
LOOK! IT SAYS KILL SCUM! (Scum is defined as Mafia + roles that are explicitly anti-town) IT DOES NOT SAY KILL TOWN!Townie Role PM wrote:You win when all threats to Rita Repulsa (which may include characters other than Power Rangers) are destroyed.
You're doing the same thing to minePeers wrote:... you're not even bothering to read my posts, are you? You're just skimming them.
Let me spell it out for you slowly, like I would for a retarded personPeers wrote:Let me spell it out for you slowly, like I would for a small child.
The town wants to win.
The town wins when the bad guys are gone.
Bad guys are a) mafia, b) SKs, c) people who are so damn retarded they do stupid stuff that prevents a) and b) from being lynched.
Now, if you want to lynch mafia, but a townie is making it so you can't...YOU IGNORE THAT TOWNIE! Then you can focus on the mafia instead of watching the Town to Scum ratio falling.Peers wrote:Now, if you want to lynch a mafia, but a townie is making it so you can't... you get rid of that townie. Then you can get rid of the mafia instead of banging your head into their brick wall.
At this point, everyone has a choice to make. lynch you or Unright, due to your inability to ACTUALLY BUILD A CASE BASED ON SOLID EVIDENCE; bring themselves down to your level and lynch UA or BBM, and look just as retarded as you; or lynch someone else, which they wont, because no one else has done anything, and if they have, its been lost because of this pointless argument you've dragged us all into.Peers wrote:At this point, everyone in this game has a choice to make: Lynch one of you, and remove part of the brick wall; Lynch me, because I let myself get dragged down to your level and look just as bad as you; or lynch someone else... which will be difficult because of the animosity going on here, but if it happens, more power to 'em.
Peers wrote:The difference is, if you're lynched, I can focus on helping my fellow townies find the scum. If I'm lynched, you'll just keep being an asshat to Unright, and then pick a new target after him.
UltimaAvalon 1:12 AM wrote:So you're saying I spent all day yelling at him about nothing? And there's nothing to show for it? Even though he spent all day talking about why its cool to lynch Town?
...
...
...
...
Nope. Not unvoting. There's at least one scum between Peers, Unright, and Originality.
note that Vanilla Townies tend to play more aggressively
UltimaAvalon 8:45AM wrote:So...you're saying this is potentially a fight between three Vanillas?
...
...
...
...
Gah.Unvote
jmar was right. I unvoted. Peers is at 5 and L-2Cogito Ergo Scum wrote:Your votecount is incorrect. Peers is currently being voted by UA, Blight, Flameaxe, Mirth, Originality and you. That's 6, and Lynch -1.jmar wrote:If my vote count is correct, that's 5 on him, but mod, can we get a vote count please?
Are you going to come up with more compelling arguments? Or are you going to continue to follow the gut of the guy who thinks you're town, while at the same time feeding us nothing but emotional bullshit?Peers wrote:Anyway, are you going to take this opertunity to think about who else is scum, or are you just going to continue to antagonize me?
CES. You were going after Flameaxe, then unvoted soon after CES said he thought you were Town. Since then, neither of you can seem to build a case against anybody except jmarPeers wrote:Who the fuck am I following?
Thanks for claiming ScumPeers wrote:Unless you think I'm the only scum in the game, you should be looking for the other ones!
We start by killing the person everyone seems to suspect the most.Bookitty wrote:Every time we suspect someone, they start lurking until they have to be replaced. What should we do?
From the looks of it, people on jumped on dybeck for not answering a question about suspicions. A little investigating reveals that his most recent post in this thread is in fact his most recent post on this site. Thus, he isn't the leading wagon for avoidance, he's the leading wagon because he just isn't here.Flameaxe wrote:Because this game is dying, what is your opinion on said leading wagon, and said leading wagonee's current state of avoidance?
No I think you're scum.Mirth wrote:Hmmm...you must think I'm a total idiot. Oh well, you're entitled to your opinion I suppose.UltimaAvalon wrote:Mirth, you do realize you're next in line for the gallows tomorrow, right? You might as well stop defending your scum buddy and help us end this God-forsaken day.
That's not how you spell jmar. Try againBookitty wrote:vote Originality
No. Just bad scumMirth wrote:Which, if you also think Jmar is scum, entails me being a total idiot.UltimaAvalon wrote:No I think you're scum.Mirth wrote:Hmmm...you must think I'm a total idiot. Oh well, you're entitled to your opinion I suppose.UltimaAvalon wrote:Mirth, you do realize you're next in line for the gallows tomorrow, right? You might as well stop defending your scum buddy and help us end this God-forsaken day.
WhyBookitty wrote:I think it's too late in the game for an "information" lynch
KMirth wrote:Avalon, I'm positively hurt.
No. If I was saying what you think I was saying, I would have a more definite answer on what I believe your alignment to be, rather than "after rereading, I've decided I need more substance to attack Mirth with than what I thought I had yesterday"Mirth wrote:Avalon, are you saying what I think you're saying?UltimaAvalon wrote: TSQ and his replacement are Town, CES is Town, and Jenter needs to calm down and maybe stop cussing, but I agree that PWS was town-ish.
Yes I canMirth wrote:Then you *cant* say TSQ and CES are town.UltimaAvalon wrote:No. If I was saying what you think I was saying, I would have a more definite answer on what I believe your alignment to be, rather than "after rereading, I've decided I need more substance to attack Mirth with than what I thought I had yesterday"Mirth wrote:Avalon, are you saying what I think you're saying?UltimaAvalon wrote: TSQ and his replacement are Town, CES is Town, and Jenter needs to calm down and maybe stop cussing, but I agree that PWS was town-ish.
This is true. However, you did not say I couldn't know it. You said I couldn't say it. And thats just not true at allMirth wrote:Only two ways you can know that. You're scum or you investigated them.UltimaAvalon wrote:Yes I canMirth wrote:Then you *cant* say TSQ and CES are town.UltimaAvalon wrote:No. If I was saying what you think I was saying, I would have a more definite answer on what I believe your alignment to be, rather than "after rereading, I've decided I need more substance to attack Mirth with than what I thought I had yesterday"Mirth wrote:Avalon, are you saying what I think you're saying?UltimaAvalon wrote: TSQ and his replacement are Town, CES is Town, and Jenter needs to calm down and maybe stop cussing, but I agree that PWS was town-ish.
Fair enough. Was a great excuse to make a nice quote pyramid in Jelly's game thoughMirth wrote:Not in the mode to argue semantics with you. You saying it doesn't make it so.UltimaAvalon wrote:This is true. However, you did not say I couldn't know it. You said I couldn't say it. And thats just not true at allMirth wrote:Only two ways you can know that. You're scum or you investigated them.UltimaAvalon wrote:Yes I canMirth wrote:Then you *cant* say TSQ and CES are town.UltimaAvalon wrote:No. If I was saying what you think I was saying, I would have a more definite answer on what I believe your alignment to be, rather than "after rereading, I've decided I need more substance to attack Mirth with than what I thought I had yesterday"Mirth wrote:Avalon, are you saying what I think you're saying?UltimaAvalon wrote: TSQ and his replacement are Town, CES is Town, and Jenter needs to calm down and maybe stop cussing, but I agree that PWS was town-ish.
Elmo, you deserve two cookies. One for being right, and another for playing SimCity. Oh, and a third for Quote Pyramids wooo.Elmo wrote:Quote pyramids woo.UltimaAvalon wrote:Fair enough. Was a great excuse to make a nice quote pyramid in Jelly's game thoughMirth wrote:Not in the mode to argue semantics with you. You saying it doesn't make it so.UltimaAvalon wrote:This is true. However, you did not say I couldn't know it. You said I couldn't say it. And thats just not true at allMirth wrote:Only two ways you can know that. You're scum or you investigated them.UltimaAvalon wrote:Yes I canMirth wrote:Then you *cant* say TSQ and CES are town.UltimaAvalon wrote:No. If I was saying what you think I was saying, I would have a more definite answer on what I believe your alignment to be, rather than "after rereading, I've decided I need more substance to attack Mirth with than what I thought I had yesterday"Mirth wrote:Avalon, are you saying what I think you're saying?UltimaAvalon wrote: TSQ and his replacement are Town, CES is Town, and Jenter needs to calm down and maybe stop cussing, but I agree that PWS was town-ish.
I'm being lazy and playing Simcity, but this discussion is silly. From my point of view, UA is expressing an opinion, like; I think you're misinterpreting it as some kinda certainty. Which would be weird, yes, but I doubt he's saying that.
I am (lazily) rereading, still. :lazy:
I don't know. I'll be sure to ask scum during the End of Game Talk-A-Thon.Mirth wrote:your predecessors softclaimed non-vanilla. You are still alive. Why?
UA wrote:5 putties? The fuck?
Except, I don't believe either of you is Town. At all. Assuming you are Town, there's a claimed kinda sorta cop that I believe is more likely to be killed tonight that the last Mason. The only other idea I can think of is to go on Jenter's "CES is scum" claim and lynch him today, and have him investigate one of you. However, I think he's tonight's nightkill, and he suspects his own sanity.UA wrote:I think there's too many vanillas around here.
Here you're just shoveling dirt onto me, and it isn't even true. No, you haven't seen me as Town recently, but you also havne't seen me as Scum recently either. I havent had a Scum role since Pariahs Greatest Bastard Hits, a game I dont recall you playing, and I hadn't been scum before then. Also, considering we're both dead in our most recent game together, I don't think anyone will mind me saying I wasn't scum there either. So I don't see where there's a lot of material for you to have developed a "scum meta" on me.BM wrote:UA is playing perfectly to his scum-meta (not that ive seen him as town recently).
Have you read the other claims? 3 claimed Vanilla, 2 claimed Mason, and 1 claimed a cop who has different sanity depending on what "vials" he uses. Every single one of these claims is near impossible to prove outside of death. Just what makes mine more "vague and unproveable" than the others?BM wrote:UA's claim is so vague and unprovable that it is pretty suspicious
I'm not quoting my role pm.BM wrote:how the fuck can your role pm "HINT THAT USE OF YOUR ABILITY HAS THE CHANCE OF A FATAL ACCIDENT"?
.....the fatal part?BM wrote:And how, if it only hinted a possible accident, did you come to the conclusion that this means death?
I was specifically waiting on three claims, Bookitty's, Mirth's, and yours. You happened to be the last to claim besides myself.BM wrote:You claimed last, in light of a vast number of vanilla claims
Thus confirming my belief that you, indeed, haven't been reading.BM wrote:et me take a stab in the dark here: Neither of Mith nor Bookitty claimed a power role that could confirm him?
Thems mighty big words for someone whos scumtell is talkingBM wrote:UA coming up with a 'plan'. Yep, he's scum alright.