Sure
VOTE: Fire
In post 16, Firebringer wrote:This vote is too vague and will not count.
In post 82, Firebringer wrote:Widow attack is a try hard and hates fun.
Obvious qualities of rebel scum [american]
VOTE: Widow Attack
Sheep me fellow loyalists!!
In post 85, SirCakez wrote:In post 59, Nosferatu wrote:VOTE: persivul
If it was a random vote why say "just tradition" while voting??
Oh yeah wgeurts is right, this is a terrible reason for a vote.
VOTE: Nosferatu
In post 127, SirCakez wrote:More Nos votes pls
Not many strong reads yet, there's a lot of joking around and roleplaying. I think Window Attack and Suzune are p townie though.
In post 147, Suzune wrote:AS bad as this sounds firebringer, I initially always townread wgeurts. So since he is half the head, I tend to wait on that read. Listening to that slot gives me ideas on their alignment and I am not ready to make that kind of decision yet. I will keep you updated.
In post 151, Suzune wrote:Well at least I was honest about it.
In post 171, Killthestory wrote:Null on both ends. Platitudes like calculated or bad play is all null.
Beeboy seems very opportunistic. Doesn't have any definitive scumreads, and blatantly sheep's people on their scumreads after further review of the gamestate.
In post 170, Killthestory wrote:In post 162, beeboy wrote:calling someone on tunneling on page 7 is bad.
LOL.
LOL.
Because clearly Fire is tunnelling using correct reasoning and actual intelligence as a foundation for his argument instead of just spamming, "Widow is scum" and explicitly stating he was gonna do that in the first place.
I mean, I could probably see where you'd be coming from if Fire wasn't being blatantly spammy and tunnely and just overall not very smart with how he's pushing this read in general.
In post 171, Killthestory wrote:blatantly sheep's people on their scumreads after further review of the gamestate.
In post 187, Firebringer wrote:In post 186, Killthestory wrote:kek
im gonna focus more on beeboy and dier if you dont mind.
dier's posts give me bad vibes
Bee boy is always like this, he tries to find something to off on and just does random stuff till he finds something to tunnel, ignore him he is town.
Not sure on die fire.
In post 191, Killthestory wrote:im scumreading him because beeboy blatantly contradicted himself
In post 218, Killthestory wrote:you're right, it isn't hypocrisy, it's a contradiction.
In the last post you stated your vote on me was the first vote you had made over the course of the game. clearly it wasnt.
In post 376, Shiro wrote:@beeboy are you prepared to commit to the cause? if you join, any backing out will be considered 100% scum claim with the person you shyied away from voting.
In post 379, SirCakez wrote:VOTE: Beeboy
Was looking at ISOs and Beeboy's is terrible. Lots of fluff, so little scumhunting.
In post 415, SirCakez wrote:Ya you're probably his scum buddy from how you came in and started defending him and attacking me immediately
In post 436, Firebringer wrote:@Beeboy, I don't trust you at all. Shiro can accept you with open arms but I consider you in my top 3 scum right now.
In post 439, Firebringer wrote:In post 438, beeboy wrote:In post 436, Firebringer wrote:@Beeboy, I don't trust you at all. Shiro can accept you with open arms but I consider you in my top 3 scum right now.
I c then I can vote Cakes without it being a scum claim.
VOTE: Sircakes
He is trying to scum paint rather than scum hunt.
And you are just sheeping wagons.
How are you scum hunting?
In post 445, Firebringer wrote:IF you have no strong town reads what is the first bracket? People you don't want to lynch today?
In post 450, SirCakez wrote:Lol this is bull. You didn't even mention a scumread in me until I voted you. This is definitely scum.
In post 470, SirCakez wrote:In post 465, beeboy wrote:In post 450, SirCakez wrote:Lol this is bull. You didn't even mention a scumread in me until I voted you. This is definitely scum.
My bad I though you where scum from 101 though.
And then you sheeped me in 149
That doesn't add up at all.
In post 532, Persivul wrote:In post 531, beeboy wrote:I need to reread to find scum.
Start with FB ISO.
In post 561, Suzune wrote:Actually now that I post that, what an interesting twist of words beeboy. I claimed he could not be scum because of the riskiness of his move if played by scum. Interesting that you changed that into he must be scum.
In post 562, Suzune wrote:i have a reason for it.In post 535, Persivul wrote:In post 226, Suzune wrote:Why? Is being called out for tunneling better some how if it happens on page 14 or page 45? Also on the subject of tunneling I do not feel like Firebringer would have any reason to do this as scum because in the event he is wrong, that places all the focus on him as one of the main drivers of the train.
How would he be wrong as scum? That makes no sense. You're quite defensive of FB, yesterday and today.
For this reason, I think I can say with slight reasonablness right now that Firebringer is a slight town lead for me.
Very defensive of him, but it still only amounts to a slight, slight town read...in case he flips red maybe?
In post 565, Suzune wrote:Well it would be interesting but if that were the case I would be the one having the fun.
Moves do not have to be universally risky. Sometimes one faction can preform moves more risky then another and some people have roles that require higher risks. Therefore, I claimed not risky behavior you instead looked for a window.
Say I am scum a few more times, I enjoy hearing the same untrue fact over and over.
In post 575, Suzune wrote:It would have been a risky play if he was scum. This suggesting it is less risky of town. The two ideas are mutually exclusive, while inherently connected.
Actually I town read window and he was town. My other strong town read is probably town too so while even is not ideal, it is not terrible. However I suspect I am not wrong about one of them.
Thanks for saying I'm scum again. I am certain the mafia would want he town to think that. Since you are wrong I guess I can handle being called scum a few more times. At the end of the game I will have to apologize for making my posts snarky, but long train rides do that to me.
In post 577, Firebringer wrote:How do you know Cakez doesn't like to bus?
Have you played a game with him as scum?
That almost feels like a slip...
In post 576, Suzune wrote:oh beeboy, clearly I was teasing you. Sorry if you missed it.
You are far from obvious town though.
In post 582, Suzune wrote:That is a catch 22. There is a mafia term for what I am looking for but I do not know it. Your line about how scum can have town reads proving I am scum is some kind f bad debating catch. What you said is the truth that it is easy for scum to have town reads, but that is irrelevant to the situation between us.
Why would you heart be broken? I do not understand.
In post 583, Suzune wrote:Yep I played. I remeber you budies me and I budies you because it was good for us both. What cakes did is more of a game exclusive kind of thing. I protect my partner and I lynxh them. He seems like a similar person, in that you adapt to meet the situation. I will not lecture on scum politics. Placing a hat on him saying that he always does something is protecting him this you trying to paint something.
In post 575, Suzune wrote:It would have been a risky play if he was scum. This suggesting it is less risky of town. The two ideas are mutually exclusive, while inherently connected.
Actually I tow read window and he was town. My other strong tow read is probably town too so while even is not ideal, it is not terrible. However I suspect I am not wrong about one of them.
Thanks for saying I'm scum again. I am certain the mafia would want he town to think that. Since you are wrong I guess I can handle being called scum a few more times. At the end of the game I will have to apologize for making my posts snarky, but long train rides do that to me.