VOTE: dumbmanganger
We're going to be fast friends! I can tell....
VOTE: dumbmanganger
No, I'm saying that town preparing not to consider multiple people as scum Day One lacks a lot of paranoia I'd expect from town.In post 77, Dunhamganger wrote:You like lynching players you have a townread on as town? Good to know.The Betting Pool wrote:I'd ask why town would do that.
omg... you have to read posts in the game? how dare we!?In post 200, Cho wrote:Assuming this was addressed to me, and not T S O, I don't think this applies to me. Probably because being the largest wagon at the moment, my name is coming up all the time anyway. It's gotten to a point where just looking for posts with my name in them when I'm in a rush leads me to glancing at most of the posts anyway.In post 197, Egg wrote:That's twice you've popped back up as soon as someone says your name.
I believe you on both counts actually. I don't think you hammered as scum, you wouldn't want to draw that attention. Still, it's a glaring point that will hurt town later if it's not resolved. I am going to throw caution to the wind though and not make the logical move of voting you. Atleast until PA tell's me we should...In post 292, Burning_Earth wrote:I'm town pinky promise
(DISCLAIMER: THE CORRECT PLAY IS PROBABLY TO LYNCH ME)
In post 292, Burning_Earth wrote:I'm town pinky promise
(DISCLAIMER: THE CORRECT PLAY IS PROBABLY TO LYNCH ME)
how exactly can you tell when someone is legitimately not giving a shit? isn't that contradictory? I don't know, just seems weird.In post 299, T S O wrote:I've seen scum pretend not to give a fuck, but in Dunham's case, it seems legitimate. He genuinely doesn't seem to give a shit, which is Town.
I do like this as a town statement. Which I think egg mentioned already. I find it hard that scum would volunteer this.In post 303, Riptide wrote:Okay, using NK WIFOM to justify a vote on someone is bad. It is the baddest of bads.
By the by, most of our play so far is just dice being dice. And I don't even see how he was that defensive.
Also, I just convinced dice Elyse was scum over night, so now we both have to go back and fix our reads.
-HS
Will post more once I stop LOLing from this statement. I very much agree Egg, thank you for saying it.In post 315, Egg wrote:Of course it's WIFOM. It's a post in a mafia game, therefore it is WIFOM. Thank God we got that out of the way.
be nice...In post 376, BipolarChemist wrote:Your posts suck shit, B_E.
I felt the same way. I am not comfortable calling him town, but I trust Penguin so I won't pursue the matter with her until I have a better case on him. BesidesIn post 459, SleepyKrew wrote:Single game meta read? Really?In post 458, The Betting Pool wrote:I'm currently comfortable calling tool town based on differences between this and Micro 318.
Gut is a meaningless way to vote someone without having to provide any actual case. Now saying we are coasting is an actual reason. Here let me show you why I think gut doesn't provide anything to the conversation.In post 603, Riptide wrote:Why not? My gut has been one of my best tools in games, so why do you have such a problem with it? That last sentence looks like AtE.
So I have a question TBP. In 23 pages you made 4 vote. 1 RVS, and 3 on the largest wagon. Why have you been so conservative with your vote?
Gut. Skrew does this satisfy you or should I provide a case?In post 606, SleepyKrew wrote:whyIn post 602, The Betting Pool wrote:My current scum reads are between tool and riptide.
pffft. How is it defensive to hate a bullshit reason for a read?In post 610, Riptide wrote:TBP - Your reaction to our easily dismissable gut vote are another thing that's bugging me. See that's what I love about gut votes. They can be used in such a manner to where you can catch scum snapping back defensively.
- Dice
Yes we would!... though from skimming forward I think you already did so I'll get to that.In post 611, Riptide wrote:Or would you rather we elaborate on your textbook scum bandwagoning you have been doing all game?
- Dice
Why would scum hammer a wagon so popular that two other people claimed intent? It ends the day and they can't be held responsible because two other people were going to do it anyway.In post 612, toolenduso wrote:BPC looks very town to me, because why would scum hammer a mislynch when they had two people who had already declared intent to hammer that mislynch?
Slightly dramatic... I don't see you ever disagreeing with the mass claim, so why you flipping out?
Risks and benefits, I think he did the right thing. Also, I've never seen a game where a night kill stops a power from resolving. That was a silly question.In post 624, T S O wrote:Maybe Lucky had a point but you should have crumbed it or something!
Our protection in the JOAT is dead; now you eat the nightkill.
Mod: theoretically, if a Vig shoots and dies in the same night, does the kill go through?
a claimed vig with no CC and a scum dead at night? Was there a moment where you thought it was possible he was scum?In post 628, toolenduso wrote:As for Egg's claim, I'm inclined to believe it because claiming vig at this point would be pretty dangerous for scum to do.
I would be surprised if you did, for the most part it's been good old Lucky here. I know I can't live up to penguin's level of town play but you should be able to read me too. We've played a few games together and you were even scum with me in my very first scum game. We bussed the hell out of each other early in the game, unfortunately you replaced out, though we still wonIn post 640, T S O wrote:Riptide is attacking TBP.
SK is attacking tool.
TBP is attacking nobody.
And I really should have a read on TBP by now if it's a hydra with penguin_alien.
Why apologize? I asked you to ask me questions, and I'm well aware that my performance here is pretty shit, and everyone from my hydra partner to the mod and the players deserve better.In post 706, T S O wrote:I'm sorry if it seems like I'm being aggressive but your inactivity is inexcusable and it's sapping this game of its energy.
The name is Lucky... Lucky2uIn post 737, BipolarChemist wrote: WHO IS THE OTHER HALF OF TPB?
saving this post for a future game where you try to push a lynch on your credibility of reads. I almost want to self vote to prove this wrong faster but I owe it to Penguin to not be a derp player.In post 740, Riptide wrote:I'm confident. I'm not always this confident in every read, but I'm pretty sure about this one.
It's the second one, so do me a favor and lynch them as an apology for my mislynchIn post 737, BipolarChemist wrote:I bet you love me, loser.
So now to decide if you're scum bussing partner, or if you're scum finally voting for a lynch you know is going bad, ripturd.
Now, sober me is thinking TPB could be scum, but I'll be goshed if I'm just not sure! I reserve the right to be waffly, you bastards!
WHO IS THE OTHER HALF OF TPB?
Quick non-sequitur, I love your avatar too...
I am going to eliminate the bad questions first.In post 749, Riptide wrote: Who do you feel is the most iffy read to you at this time? Why is that?
If you had a vig shot, who would you shoot right now?
Why do you feel you are so out of sync this game?
Do you feel confident in the reads you made? (whenever you make them)
I will probably have more post reads, but these are good for now.
It has nothing to do with my lynch status, it's because I've accepted that I am alone now and must treat this game like I am alone.In post 778, toolenduso wrote:Re-read:
TBP
-Comes across as semi-active. Not quite stepping into the spotlight and not quite lurking, but kind of just participating enough. That in itself is not scummy, but when you factor in the consistent participation in wagons it does begin to look like scum-motivated behavior.
-#323 also looks scummy. TBP says that B_E's hammer looks like town, but agrees that town should probably lynch B_E. Lynching somebody you think is town is always hard to justify, but the justification TBP provides ("it's a glaring point that will hurt town later if it's not resolved") is especially hard to swallow. Why would town want to lynch somebody they think is town without trying to convince other townies that the hammer didn't come from scum first? This looks like scum pushing town toward a mislynch while trying to avoid being blatant/inventing reasons to do so.
-Play has felt more genuine after being pressured/sitting at L-1 and L-2 for a while, but I don't place that out of the reach of capability for the players in the slot as scum.
You'll have to excuse me if I am being cynical, but as you are my top scum pick, I don't take you seriously at the moment.In post 782, Riptide wrote:The fact that I'm making an effort to engage lucky in this game, and he's treating it as "these questions are useless" does bug me. It's almost as if he doesn't want to be engaged.
Surprised you remembered me from anything >_>In post 802, fferyllt wrote:76 - it looks like they all but missed RVS. I'm having a little trouble figuring out what this post was in response to and if it was pro-scum-Cho or not even after reading it in context. However, PA's aware of the Cho wagon and looks cautious about someone (Cho? Elyse?) townbinning a bunch of people early because lolparanoidtown.
I'm trying to think if she's taken a similar stance on other players doing this sort of thing in other games, and I can't think of an example offhand. She plays with people (like me) who townhunt/poe on day 1, so the concept isn't foreign. Could be in how the sentiment was expressed by the other player, maybe.
161 gives out some town reads. In at least one case she's in disagreement with day-1-jargonaut. So, distancing, or town genuinely disagreeing.
164 is Lucky. I'm going to have to brush up on my Lucky meta. I've played 2 games with him where he was town and none where he was scum. In one I was scum and in the other I was town. As scum, I was happy to have an easy mislynch available, though I didn't push it. I replaced into a slot just an hour or two before he was hammered (by my scumbuddy iirc). In the second game I scumread him (it was mutual iirc) but was somewhat cautious because I had him filed under "easy mislynch". I can't remember what I gleaned from metaing him in our last game. :/
Anyway, the case accompanying the vote is pretty detailed. I'll take the word on the street that it's mostly rehash of other's cases for now.
Just a general point that luckys being pretty active (I think - in context I may see that these posts are sparsely scattered) and looks pretty engaged. There's also so humor about their hydra synch troubles. IIRC his posts tend to have a happy-go-lucky fee. I need to do a meta refresh to see if this is more predominant in one alignment over another. Update - reading onward I see they have come under fire for lack of presence later in the game.
ASIDE:What was driving the discussion about night kill resolution?
707 pinged my hypocrisy button, since he gave Cho guff about asking people to ask her questions. The situations aren't parallel but it's the sort of thing that I feel would register. A scum player might avoid it (or might not notice it? It's a little harder to keep your story straight as scum). A town player might not care how it looks because "fuck yeah I'm town, therefore everything I do is town motivated. deal with it".
716 - this post by PA gives me townfeels.
746 - this posturing could come from either alignment, but it also gives me townfeels. 748 also gives me townfeels.
379 and 387 documents some out-of-synchness as well as PA not caught up. I like that she questioned the basis for someone townreading them, though I think scum-PA would probably push that a tad on principle because lol-scum-don't-do-that.
458 PA is passing out a lot of town reads, however footnoted. Want to call it a town point, especially given she was semi-head-in-the-game and it would have been easy to leave those reads unspoken.
Feeling overall somewhat town about them. Lucky in particular feels more like he's trying to things up so town gets some benefit from his mislynch than like he's actually fighting the lynch.
I want to poke through bandwagons in a bit, but if their wagon has been largely uncountered today that's going to bug me. Based on the toog/SK argument I read through somewhere around page 26/27/28 it would have been pretty easy for scum to fan flames and make an SK wagon into something if TBP is scum. There may have been other singleton votes that could have been fanned into a real wagon as well.
Most recently (post site return), your entry back into the game after the site returned and your flop of a joke about counter claiming.In post 790, T S O wrote:Such as what?In post 780, The Betting Pool wrote: 1. My most iffy read is TSO. I think he is town, but he has outbursts of things that set off my scumdar.
what's the difference between scum tunneling and town tunneling?In post 807, Riptide wrote:So basically, you're going to start scum tunneling?In post 805, The Betting Pool wrote:You'll have to excuse me if I am being cynical, but as you are my top scum pick, I don't take you seriously at the moment.In post 782, Riptide wrote:The fact that I'm making an effort to engage lucky in this game, and he's treating it as "these questions are useless" does bug me. It's almost as if he doesn't want to be engaged.
At this point it's a combination of PoE and their attacks on my slot. I believe his motives to be coming from a "scum picking up the easy mislynch fruit while it's ripe" place. I have enough experience being the mislynch after all...In post 806, fferyllt wrote:Why is Riptide your top scum read?
Yea seriously BPC, you can only pick one of usIn post 834, Riptide wrote:Hey BPC, can you remind us what your reasons are for scum reading TBP and us? Also, do you believe TBP and us are partners?