Hi.
UNVOTE:
55 pages...fcuk! I'll try to get caught up before I'm prodded.
Hi.
And if town...now frees scum up to look elsewhere.In post 1610, shos wrote:In post 1418, MattP wrote:Because Shos is scum, Wisdom is town, Mala is town,and a neighborizer won't be roleblocked or nightkilled but lends credence to my beliefs?
Between scum...the lovers you mention...and at least 2 neighborizors....that's a shitload of players. What does you telling us someone is in a QT accomplish? Unless someone denies it and you catch them....but then again they might just not want to be outed. So your PR isn't that "huge" IMO.In post 1625, Malakittens wrote:I'm a huge threat to scum and a huge town power favor.
EBWOP due to $&$@! auto word....In post 1806, havingfitz wrote:...is more useless than she knew.
What question to me?In post 1951, Malakittens wrote:Again same question to you as I had for Fitz.
Then why would you have issue with people condemning him? What is he suspected of that Whiskers is getting a pass on?In post 1961, Malakittens wrote:'m no longer townreading matt. I think I already said this, actually.
In post 1951, Malakittens wrote:I still don't see why everyone is condemming Matt, but not Whiskers.
Huh? Is this sarcasm or equally likely, did I miss something?In post 2115, Desperado wrote:Mirari, why aren't you and ooba doing anything about yourmutual conftown status?
What more did you want than this Wisdom? If I neighborize someone N1 I don't actually get to chat with them until the following night. I can have as many as I want so I assume if I neighborize someone N2...I can talk to them N3. Etc. No limit. Also...my QT already exists. I can't post in it during the day but N1 I can use it...to talk to myself if I wanted...until someone joins the following night. Assuming I neighborize. I'm really not a big fan so don't care if I do or not.In post 1791, havingfitz wrote:I'm Hermes. I'm a Neighborizor.
No restriction other than the fact the person I select N1 doesn't join my QT till N2. I can have as many as I like (@ 1 per night). Not sure if they get notified N1 that they were neighborized or not. I assume not.
I do not know your alignment.In post 2281, Whiskers wrote:and become a bona-fide mason team
As an expression of frustration.In post 2442, Wisdom wrote:Not sure how you mean this.
In post 2470, ooba wrote:But am still happy with my scum team call out of {Grim, fitz, Penguin}
In post 2471, havingfitz wrote:Oopa.....why me?
And answered...In post 2328, shos wrote:Wanted to see how the newguy from othersite reacts. Didnt get what i seeked
That is not true. It gave opinion. It gave information into my plans for neighborizing N1. It asked questions I wanted answers to which I could care less if you were interested in the information I was requesting.In post 2622, Nachomamma8 wrote:This post is seriously lacking in anything interesting.
I don't think I would prefer a no lynch over anyone. That would be a ridiculous waste in a D1 this size. I just wouldn't be interested in supporting it and I'm sure (or assume at least) there are others who would be more interested in lynching penguin if it came down to her or a NL.In post 2649, Wisdom wrote:So you would prefer a no-lynch over penguin?
Why not? Why not use it on one of the other neighborizors to confirm your role or Grimgrove to confirm his? Or Mala? Why none at allIn post 2838, Whiskers wrote:Oh, you're finally going to ask it?In post 2834, Malakittens wrote:Whiskers are you goin to ignore my question for the third time in a row?
Did you use your ability n1? If so who?
Or did you mean when you asked all of the neighborizers in 2730? Sorry, I wasn't ignoring you, per se: I figured that I didn't answer you would have been answer enough. To clarify,no, i submitted a No Action.
I'm not doing any of the stuff you are mentioning which I bolded. I said I had liked GG D1. He was a town read for me. The only reason I was doubting that read was because Eagle was claiming weak doc in addition to being a Virgin. I didn't think it was likely that the mod would have a virgin role AND an investigative role combined. Until I realized this morning that that is essentially what Wisdom was. He could be neighborized (like a virgin)...and the fact he couldn't be investigated is irrelevent to my point...and he was an investigative role. So basically the same thing IMO as Eagle's role. So I'm not saying I think Eagle is town because of Wisdom's flip...I'm saying my suspicions were misplaced based on wisdom's flip. And if I am to believe Eagle...that clears Mala. And I don't know wth you are on about in the last lineIn post 3186, shos wrote:wisdom was ascetic, that means he cannot be targetted at ALL. if he was to be the same, he would be virgin, not ascetic. he couldn't be neighebourized, yes, but he also couldn't be investigated, remember?so you getting a 'strong town' read on eagle from wisdom's flip is terrible imo. and if you base both his and mala's alignment on wisdom's N1 flip, it's even worse. you're playing outguess the mod when you only have 2 flips and none of them confirmed any of the neighbourizing-related claims.
Assuming this is directed at me.....I suspected Nacho-tbd yesterday. If anything I probably suspect him a little LESS today. The only thing I have issue with from him today is his push on me. Scum try to get town lynched. lol at you discrediting omgus. omgus happens.In post 3186, shos wrote:lol @omgus on nachotown
You don't have to reiterate anything...you just need to read closer. I referred to you wanting to be docced. Problem with that is doccing you prevents Eagle from doccing Mala. If Eagle "protects/investigates" someone other than Mala and picks scum...he's dead. Combined with the potential of scum shooting Mala if they know she isn't going to be protected...that could lead to two deaths. If Eagle protects Mala...we're guaranteed at least one of them surviving and getting an investigative result from Mala (barring a RBer). Plus if Eagle dies...that would confirm Mala. So investigation result and confirmed Mala trumps shos still in the game (alignment unknown depending on who Mala looks at) and dead weak doc.In post 3186, shos wrote:OMFG.
do I need to reiterate it a thousand times? I wanted to be DOCCED. not CONFIRMED. that is just a sideeffect an important one, but the main idea is that I want to survive the night, and tomorrow I'll decide if it's vital that I survive even more or not.
The only way in which wifom occurs is if eagle dies and he dies ALONE. then, we don't know if I am scum who didn't shoot or if scum shot him and I can be town. either way I survive and mala gets a result. so why not. I think he is likely to die anyway if he is town so why not say what I think he should do if he is town? if he is scum it doesn't really matter now does it? and it doesn't look like people are going to help me lynch him so yeah. lynch ika, protect+investigate me/mala, investigate nacho/des. That's probably the best plan I can think of.
That works too.In post 3300, Desperado wrote:Titus and Eagle.
Oh...ok. You flipped a coin. That explains everything. You're clear.In post 3302, 1baldeagle1 wrote:fitz, can you read the game please... that I flipped a coin to ensure my night actions are random so scum cannot try to plan possible ways to thwart the plan.
Alright, targets for tonight:
1. Kise
2. Nacho
I'm willing to switch out Kise and put fitz in if you guys want me to.
So why are you voting me? Because ika did or didn’t mention me? That’s crap logic.In post 3429, shos wrote:Ok.
In ika's ENTIRE ISO he only interacted with conftowns, me and whiskers.
Seriously. Read it. There doesnt seem to be a single mention of fitz, des and nacho.
VOTE: Fitz.
So if you think I am scum…you are basing that on Eagle being scum too (and clearing his buddy) …which I strongly doubt any scum team would do while at the same time both pushing for the lynch of their partner. OR…Scum managed to RB Eagle at the exact time he was inclined to hide behind me. But wait…if we are to believe your role….as you should….then unless you think there is the unusual combo of Mafia Neighborizor_Roleblocker OR mafia Encryptor_Roleblocker…then Eagle could not have been impacted by Scum. Which points all the more at Eagle being scum IMO.In post 3429, shos wrote:I am pretty sure by now that scum somehow manipulated eagle(or eagle is scum). This managed to get fitz conftown, which means that to win he can just lurk his butt off - which he does. Scum did not know that I will get info about neighboueizers; just keep pushing the (correct) ideathat one neighbourizer is scum..then it will get whiskerstown lynched, as the last unconf neighbourizer standing which will get scum to lylo as conftownfitz, and both masons dead. It is even better if eagle is town - because they shoot him and then in 3p lylo fitz is SUPERCONFtown...
Once again…unless you are not being honest or believe there is the unusual combo of Mafia Neighborizor_Roleblocker OR mafia Encryptor_Roleblocker…this can’t be the case.In post 3429, shos wrote:Has fitz even neighbourized anyone yet? If not it all just fits(no pun intended) - eagletown targets mala or fitz; so fitz blocks eagle, have no fear in shooting mala. If eagle protects mala then people will lynch eagle for not being doc. If he targets fitz then fitz gets conftown.
None of it makes sense chicken little. Get your head out of your arse.In post 3429, shos wrote:It all makes sense, and that means we are looking at nacho-fitz scumteam or des-fitz scumteam.
I don’t need to interact with the people I suspect to suspect them and unless we’re in a LYLO situation or I have some sort of rock solid confirmation that another player is scum…I’m not big on cheerleading others into voting my reads. Especially when my case is as strong as “don’t like his posting.”In post 3436, Desperado wrote:Dual mollie/arc townreads in the first five pages were fake as hell
Fitz's Ika interactions are terrible. He votes him late D1 because he "doesn't like" his posting, but he doesn't pursue the read or interact with Ika at all. Ika ignores his vote in kind.
How is stating the game is easier without Wisdom a scum mindset? I’ll state that opinion all day every day. He posts too much and things get buried or glossed over. And the ika lynch D2 was taking place while I was on vacation so the little I posted that day was to be expected. I had no problem with ika being the lynch D2 as supported by my wagoning on the slot D1.In post 3436, Desperado wrote:D2 is even worse--Ika is a legitimate wagon (and the one Fitz wanted at the end of D1) with Titus-Desp-Grim and instead of helping us push Ika with a vote, Fitz says:First, the notion that this game would be easier with Wisdom gone is scum mindset 100%. Second, he still wants to lynch Ika but won't vote him because there's no rush??? Inexplicable. Fitz proceeds to ignore Ika completelyIn post 2783, havingfitz wrote:Here....on vacation at the moment (until the 6th) so a bit distracted. Staying caught up for the most part on the reading....easier now with wisdom gone.
Pre-lynch suspicions towards Matt (Titus) and ika still remain. Still mulling over next step...no rush.againexcept for one single blurb in his massive catchup in #3161, in which he says "Ika is taking a shit...good to know." I'm not making this up.
There were no scummy interactions because I am not scum. And I came down from my suspicions towards Kise so you pushing that point on me is crap. The was nothing out of line having suspicions towards Kise’s quick hammer on ika. There’s this term called bussing you should familiarize yourself with. It’s something BTW that I do not do.In post 3436, Desperado wrote:And then his first vote D3 is on Kise for not letting scum (that he wanted to be lynched) fake claim??
tl;dr: the Fitz and Ika slots had scummy interactions going back to their Arc/Mollie iterations. You should vote him.In post 3226, havingfitz wrote:VOTE: Kise
For the quick hammer on ika without a chance to claim and for not doing anything. No reads....no content. Just expecting town's trust.
Is that your interpretation or is it stated somewhere?In post 3594, Wisdom wrote:The vote happens when the mod reads it, not at the end of the post. That's how I would have done it too, regardless of whether it was the hammer or not.
Separate posts...absolutely. Within the same post...not as clear cut IMO.In post 3597, shos wrote:The reason is that once a lynch is reached it cannot be undone. Its similar to hammmer and unvote in another post