OH SHIT MOLE'S A GUY?
O.O
<.<
>.>
Anyway...
I've been inactive because I felt no benefit from posting out of turn.
I wish I had taken notes beforehand...but here I go.
#1: TCS
The Central Scrutinizer wrote:unvote
vote:cardb0ardb0x
I think it's ridiculous to consider an early game selfvote a scum tell. I simply random.org'd it and the number came up me. I thought it would be funny to self-vote, so I did. I would like to hear your reasons for thinking that a selfvote is a scum tell (unless you were just OMGUS'ing).
This didn't seem legit to me. I don't see why it's vote worthy, to be honest.
The Central Scrutinizer wrote:I'm here, still trying to figure out why everyone is so anxious to vote MSG, timmy, or neongrey.
Timmy, eh? I believe this is his only mention of the wagon.
The Central Scrutinizer wrote:molestargazer & neongrey
: I am unsure what to do with these two. I find it highly unlikely that both scum signed onto the Page 1 Twomz (StD) bandwagon, as Ubertimmy was the 3rd vote in post number 11. I think it's more likely that the other scum was waiting in the wings to lay down the Hammah, or at least the second to last vote. However, MSG's generally poor reasoning and pleading of memory lapses seems scummy to me. Neongrey loved to ask for reasons for the vote on Ubertimmy, but has been suspisciously useless since.
TCS places mole and neongrey low on the list, but keeps people below them. He expresses doubt that both, or even one of them, are scum, a subtle direction towards the town.
The Central Scrutinizer wrote:@mole: Why do you decline to comment on the scumminess of the other people on the Masterchief wagon?
That's a fair question.
Town, please ask yourselves why TCS said that. If you came up with distancing, I'll give you a cookie.
The Central Scrutinizer wrote:
See, that's why I ranked Kelly Chen so high on my list. I think for this whole game she's been making mountains out of
mole
hills and that just plain stinks to me.
See? He can't keep it inside! He just wants to scream that his partner is MSG!
#2 Mole:
As you can probably tell, much of my case is the connection between these two.
Here's Mole's side.
Most of his posts early on have been lacking content and information. A lot of his attacks are derived from other people, i.e. he goes after C_D following me and goes after me following TCS in this post:
molestargazer wrote:TCS wrote:I always find it suspicious when someone votes for a person for a particular reason without even mentioning another player who did the exact same thing.
This could merely be the case of a memory thing. My memory is generally awful, and possibly STD forgot that that had happened. I am now trying to get him off the hook, I'm merely throwing out a suggestion.
However, I do know what you mean. It does seem slightly odd, and STD was throwing out suspicions in his first post.
Mole half agrees, half disagrees. A little chummy. He gets ready to jump on the wagon if a wagon is to start on me by unvoting C_D and FOSing me.
molestargazer wrote:I have noticed that he didn't post much at all earlier on apart from when he was accused. To me, lurking springs to mind, however I know that I have been using this tactic as well - so I won't take it into account. Just food for thought.
<<snips>>
I find this kind of odd - to me it sorta seems like OMGUS - this happened shortly after I was accused of the same thing. Seems odd to me.
However, I still don't see a crystal clear reason for a vote.
The first part regards MSG's take on TCS's lurking, and the second about TCS's vote on me. Both times MSG denies them as possible ways for him to attack TCS because he claims that he's also done them. He then goes on to FOS two other people.
molestargazer wrote:TCS, that was an excellent post. I also liked the way you put yourself in and saw yourself from other points of view - you weren't trying to avoid suspicion.
Attaboy. Way to not look suspicious. Subtle tell.
molestargazer wrote:TCS wrote:Maybe I'm barking up the wrong tree, and we should be lynching the people who are talking the least?
You've got a point, but I think currently we've got more than enough evidence to go off.
[/quote]
That's a point? That sounds like rekless behavior and you seem to want to possibly steer him away from it.
molestargazer wrote:No offence meant here, but if you can't see anything at least worth talking about, such as TCS's very good post recently, or Kelly Chen's ideas, then you need to make the font bigger.
otra vez
molestargazer wrote:
I have decided that I don't want to lynch inactives or lurkers. I cannot pick out who is scummy myself - even after TCS's excellent post.
and again.
MSG mentions it a couple more times, but uses it as a way to gauge suspicion on him and uses it to look at other people.
molestargazer wrote:In
no particular order
...
I should have been more clear. I wanted to see meerly a list of names (and maybe a little about each) in an order. You gave me your opinions in no order. This is fine. I do see the fact they aren't in order is a non-commital thing. Up until DR's 3 person thing, you've been very non-comital and have been following other people, which is a scumtell in my book.
molestargazer wrote:1. Pablito - See above
2. Masterchief - See above
3. TCS - See above
Pablito: FOS'd twice, voted 0 times.
Masterchief: FOS'd 0 times, voted once.
TCS: FOS'd 0 times, voted 0 times.
And the most condemning piece of evidence:
molestargazer wrote:I'd also like an explanation of a Jester.
It's not on the cool little flash thing
It is on the flash thing under third party roles, IIRC.
I...um...don't really have a number 3...I have a really bad habbit of playing with blinders on. I caught this connection a while ago and wanted to see how far I could take it, but I suppose it wouldn't hurt to let it out now.
I'm pretty sure that mole + TCS > 0 scum.
If I had to pick number 3, it'd probably be Jack (cuz he don't seem to be doing much).