Good name.
Note: I am
danakillsu wrote:Alright, it's good to see this player-list in a game I signed up for so long ago.
Before we get started, how much do you guys know about this show? For once, I feel like a bit of an expert on the flavor material.
Season 1 isn't exactly my strong point in Chuck, but I still remember a good deal of it.vote: ReaperCharlie
Obvscum is obvscum.
ReaperCharlie wrote:I know nothing about flavor except that Miranda is in it.
PeregrineV wrote:@Channel- Your case is so uttering compelling, I am very surprised. Each time I read it, I get chills and see things in a new light.
ChannelDelibird wrote:The Thor wagon is pretty worthy. I approve of it. Good luck with it - I'll make myself busy exploring my own line of investigation in the meantime.
PeregrineV wrote:I have no clue right now. Rag has done no more or less than other players so far today, so he hasn't particularly earned a scum or town read.
MarchHare wrote:
This is so feeble and contrived it's ridiculous.
Unvote. Vote: ReaperCharlie.
Ant_to_the_max wrote:ChannelDelibird wrote:
Interesting. Do elaborate.
His second post was the bottom of page 2. Not seeing his posts as scummy with the context of being on page 2.
Thor665 wrote:Ragnarokio wrote:D:
You'll be for tomorrow if I make it.
@ChannelDel - look at how town is dorking around and tell me we're not in a random period. RC is calling people scum teams while still not voting them. Ragi s catting around with her style of nothingness and acting like it's still relevant by this stage of the game, half the players are barely participating, and we're running a wagon on me that no one is actually advancing or trying to do anything with. Frankly I'd like to kill the whole lot of you.
What do you see as our non-random progress and where do you think we should have been going?
ReaperCharlie wrote:ChannelDelibird wrote:I'm against the alliance pretty much just because.
This is the attitude that kills towns. That's like saying you're against Mass-claim. Did you even read my post?
Ragnarokio wrote:
Also, Channel, I think you missed my question.
Channel: Do you have any opinions that you haven't shared?
PeregrineV wrote:80% of posts are one-liners.
PeregrineV wrote:Mostly comments. Some questions.
PeregrineV wrote:Total scum found in 500 posts: Me.
PeregrineV wrote:
ChannelDelibird wrote:He also said "Let's hear everyone else's cases", which struck me as a little weird, seeing as his case was a funny image - seemed like he was encouraging more random spam rather than getting on with the game.
So in effect I was asking them to restate thier cases and take down the randomness level but making them think about thier votes, and you decided that I was encouraging more random spam? So you ignored the actual words I wrote? Or did you merely apply new meaning to the existing words?
PeregrineV wrote:ChannelDelibird wrote:
I found it interesting, so I moved my vote to him. I didn't make any further comment because I wanted to see if/how he/others would react to it.
This post by Ant was the first interesting reaction I got, once I "bumped" my vote. This is the sort of post that I've let scum get away with before - in which I vote or announce suspicion on someone without elaboration and a scum goes "yeah, I had a funny feeling too" or similar to try and look like they're sharing my thought process. This is a big part of why I think Ant is likely scum.
Peregrine then makes this post after a few pages away. He makes a point of commenting only on the fact that I am voting for him and also some references to the early page spam shenangians. Nothing else.
Meanwhile, back in the Bird-Cave, CDB composes his own nefarious post in this time frame, and posts it!Nothing else.
PeregrineV wrote:Inside joke.ChannelDelibird wrote:
Then he jumps on the Thor wagon when a couple of other people do. Exploitative.
PeregrineV wrote:ChannelDelibird wrote:
Then all of a sudden he doesn't want Thor wagoned. It's not as if anything in between his vote and unvote actually came from Thor, or had any reasons from anyone as to why he shouldn't be being wagoned after all.
Yes, Thor was at L-1, and one more vote would lynch him. I didn't actually want him lynched, as he seems pretty townish. So why keep him at L-1 and make it easy for someone to do? And you agree with me,but, it's still part of your arguement about why I'm scum?
PeregrineV wrote:ChannelDelibird wrote:
Meanwhile, Ant no longer seems to have found Peregrine suspicious after all.
This is a really interesting post from Ant, in that itlookslike he's saying something, but he's actually not saying anything at all. He's trying to look as if he has a reaction to the fake daykill without actually giving an opinion.
In this post,, Ant makes excuses for lurkers (which he can potentially refer to later when a lurking scumbuddy comes up for suspicion). His Peregrine vote is quite interesting and I'm not sure what to make of it either way (reluctant to draw any direct connections between anyone before we get a scumflip, anyway).
Ant does get town points for giving opinions on everyone unsolicited. Gives me pause.
I've already pointed out why I think the second part of this Peregrine post is scummy, but the first part of it is, too. See Peregrine straddle the fence with expert precision refusing to make a stand either side of the RC/dana debate.
So what I'm hearing is that in your opinion my post was anti-town and mafia-team inspired because I refused to take either Danakillsu or ReaperCharlie's side in a debate they were having?
Well, since it's your opinion, you can't really be wrong, now can you? However, I might point out your opinion has it's roots in faulty reasoning. People are allowed to debate without my interjecting anything. They are allowed to do this anytime. I am allowed to interject, if I so desire. I can do this at any time. I can interject, and state my feelings, thoughts, opinions, etc. They can be my own and not mirror one of the debaters. Or they can wholly or partially match the side of one of the debaters.
For the record, my stand on that debate is the same as CDB. Please provide the link so we both know where we both stand.
PeregrineV wrote:ChannelDelibird wrote:
This ReaperCharlie post stood out weirdly on reread. He complains that I didn't comment on dana's iso read and subsequent vote on Peregrine then uses it as evidence that dana and I are scumbuddies. He also says that "only stupid town or scum confirm vote" which is such an incredible generalisation (I mean, blatantly false). Yes, he has the audacity to callmea "tunneling townie". This is RC who's been going after dana all game on pretty much no reasoning.
Back to Peregrine, and this post shows him simply dimissing a reasoned explanation from me about the psychology of scum players and why I thought one of his posts was worded in a way more likely to come from scum than town as "opinion". He also says he wants to avoid "post wars", which appears to mean "having any kind of discussion with the people who are voting for me at all".
I believe the post shows that I am pointing out that you are expressing opinions and expect us, the readers, to take them as fact. You do it again in the sentence above. You are the only person voting me, and it took you 3 weeks and 20 pages to put up a case, half of which is your suspicions of other players, and you would like "discussion" on it?
OK. Here it is.
I see your opinion, and dismiss it entirely since I know my own alignment.
Mastermind of Sin wrote:ChannelDelibird wrote:How is saying that if his top suspect doesn't have enough votes before the deadline that he'll switch to someone he's not sure on in order to ensure town gets a lynch a bad thing?
Like, seriously. Town needs lynches. There's obviously not much of a consensus. It's entirely reasonable of dana to say that.
I find it suspicious that dana only has one suspect in this entire game.