GreyICE wrote:Okay, I've decided to stay in, but I have to say quite honestly that I really wish I knew Zinger's alignment.
kcdaspot blatantly didn't follow instructions, and claimed to be using the vig tonight. Coincidentally, a scum kill is missing from day 1.
Now there'll be two kills N2? And this proves him town how exactly?
Blatantly not following instructions and this makes me want to lynch him immediately as lying scum, but I keep getting stymied by the fact that if Zinger was scum then kcdaspot is almost certainly town.
So I'm kind of fucking stuck.
kcdaspot, why the FUCK did you not vig someone night 1 like you were supposed to?
You realize that this is also explained by KCD being the target of the kill night 1? Assuming he's town, he'd be an obvious choice for the PR he claimed, and if he went to N2 and scum shot n1 there'd be no kill.
Maxous wrote:RE: The Amished tell: I understand that this tell might be correct more often than not but it
does not confirm
Zinger as mafia.
It is a theory tell - possibly a succesful one in a lot of cases - but still a theory tell.
@Mr.Trow: Who
are
your main suspects as mafia in this game anyway?
No, it doesn't confirm him as scum. However, it does mean it's more likely he was scum than not, and it makes a difference in how I, at least, approach the rest of the game.
Now, what I'm not seeing in this post is scumhunting. Care to add some?
MrTrow wrote:smargaret wrote:He says they're both town and completely ignores the Amished tell - the only reason to lynch Zinger is the VT thing.
It was mainly gut(as i wrote it last minute, while at a birthday party, so yes i missed a thing or 2) however:
Zinger: either fake claiming scum (for which VT is usually quite a weak claim (as, like you just stated, it made him a safe lynch(the outing the real thing purpose is not nearly as strong as the setup is closed, but still present)))
or a lost townie who actually believed his flip would provide usefull information(which his speach seemed to imply).
I gave him the chance to back up his claim and he did. (he self-voted, if he had saved himself by that stunt and not voting himself i`ll be after him day 2, more likely scenario though, he tries to save himself with it (fails and ends up nr2 on the lynch-block), securing (probably not only) my vote in the lynch-phase)
What??? Yeah, this didn't get rid of my suspicion. Also, the "just two of them" is blatant misrep.
WE ARE NOT CLEARING PEOPLE BASED ON THEIR REACTION TO THE NO FLIP THING.
1. We're not clearing me: Even if scum have a janitor and know that flips should be revealed, don't you think scum could be smart enough to ask that question and look town? Yeah, it's WIFOMy, but it's possible and discarding the possibility is stupid.
2. We're not clearing GreyIce. Again, possible scum have something set up with associative tells, and losing flips would hurt that plan. Plus, no-flip games aren't fun to play in general; his reaction is null.
Tragedy wrote:VOTE: Lynch
Could we see your whole list before doing this please?
RC, basically it comes down to this - having flips be open would be too much power to the town. There may be flaws in my hypotheticals, but those are just examples, and there are other examples out there (for instance, while doc time traveling to night 2 to revive someone would reveal that the doc was in n2, it wouldn't reveal who the doc was). Having open flips would mean that we couldn't have a doc, which is also something to be avoided.
C-Worl wrote:Oh hai! Waddid I miss?
Vig him, please, KCD.
Imaginality, why do you have a townread on Trow?
Tragedy, why are you encouraging C-Worl? Also, I'm a she too.
Ghostwriter's 856 is townposting.
Could someone please link Tragedy's case on me? I can't seem to find it now.
Maxous's 863 is goodposting. He moves down my list.
Tragedy, why did you claim? You should know better.
KCD, you're not the only one in this game who's on the spectrum. Please stop using it as an excuse.