MrBuddyLee wrote:I read my predecessor's post history and he looks like a total douchebag and obvious scum.
Hi, I'm replacing Magnetic. I replaced in because PJ asked me to and because Shanba is totally Shibby. Let's catch us some scum.
I'm certain that I see your possible connection with moz. Why are you telling me what to think?Meransiel wrote:
Also:
@nopointinactingup: Oh, how sweet, certain I'm scum, are ye not? Mind stating exactly why?
Also, information-wise, it would be better to vote for moz. If I die and flip town, you will get a null-town read on him so hard it will probably protect him for a day or so. But, if he flips town, it would raise suspicion on me (notice the way I'm not defending him).
The only people I see saying their predecessor is scummy is scum. It's like saying "Hey guys, my predes was scummy as fuk, but don't chu worry Imma look as townish as possible". Additionally, you apparently didn't even read that Magnetic never had 1 post.MrScummyLee wrote: Hey kids, what's the "reliable scumtell"? Please be very specific with your answers.
nopointinactingup wrote:If his post history was what you looked into then why does he look like "obvious scum" and not "obvious cheater".
Stop lying. You retract your statement apx 10 hours after you made your so called "gambit to see who's paying attention". If it was really a gambit, why would you reveal it right when only about 3 people have seen it. Sounds to me like you making justifications for your sorry self.MrScummyLee wrote:My predecessor hadn't posted at all. I've already said that I commented on my predecessor to see who was paying attention to the game. Clearly you aren't.Amrun wrote:I think it's called Arishem tell, when you apologize for your predecessor.
Reaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaallly not liking MrBuddyLee.fos: Amrun
tut tut over-elaborated excuses.MrScummyLee wrote: No, I didn't read at all, actually. I just checked the first post to see if I was in the right game, and to see if CrashTextDummie had also replaced in as PJ promised. I think PJ may have lied to me, or at least used weaselly legalese, but I'll stick around anyway. I also checked the little dropdown at the bottom of the page and saw my predecessor hadn't posted in this game yet, so I made a smart-ass comment to see who was paying attention. No one really noticed or at least commented on the fact that my predecessor never actually posted in this game. When I said I read his post history, I actually just checked his history outside this game to see why he got banned from the site.
No I only got you nailed down as 99% scum. And I don't need YOU to believe my reasons are "good". Other people are being lenient just because this kid is flapping his wings all over the places. THINK, why the fuk would someone do a gambit like " Oh cool lol Imma lie to see if people pay attention or not".MrBuddyLee wrote: * nopointinactingup -- says he's got three scum nailed down, gives exactly 0.0 good reasons
petroleumjelly wrote:...
MrBuddyLee was pretty clearly joking when he said his predecessor was scummy. It literally would only make sense for scum to say that if they read their predecessor's posts and thought "dear God, this guy was scummy."
He was not joking. He said so himself. You guys are the ones who's reading me wrong. My main point doesn't lie within the fact that he criticized his predeccessor, but rather that he's lying and making up stuff to fill his lies. My initial comment was essentially meant to pressure.scotmany12 wrote: Regardless, that isn't even applicable to this situation. MBL's opening post was clearly a joke, which is evident by the fact that his predecessor hadn't posted at all. nopoints scumtell has no reason to be applied in this situation.
I agree, though you seem to have mistaken me with Truant.petroleumjelly wrote: You are basically accusing somebody of replacing in,not reading their predecessor's posts, and yet (without actually knowing if their predecessor was scummy) saying that their predecessor was scummy. Thereasoningbehind your "scum-tell" of calling your predecessor "scummy" isnot applicableto this game precisely because MrBuddyLee's predecessor was not scummy because he never posted; therefore, there is no reason for MrBuddyLee to compensate for Magnetic's play.
LOL they ( especially moz ) gonna get the rope after you so don't you worry for your partners. Good distancing I must say.MrBuddyLee wrote: * nopointactingup used MBL as an excuse not to vote the obvious scumpartners M&M. This is weak protection of Meransiel and mozamis by nopoint.
AND here we have our winning reciprocal distancing!mozamis wrote:Mr Buddy lee, you are completely right. I should have moved my vote of PJ onto you sooner.
Apologies.
UNVOTE VOTE MR BUDDY LEE
Nice attempt at ad hom and straw manning almost all of my case out of your replies.MrBuddyLee wrote:Because it's funny to call someone obvious scum when they haven't posted at all yet. It's even funnier if you can trick people into knee-jerk responding that you're obvious scum for "defending your predecessor". It's even funnier if those knee-jerkers turn out to be scum in the end. *crosses fingers*nopointinactingup wrote:If his post history was what you looked into then why does he look like "obvious scum" and not "obvious cheater".
nopointinactingup wrote: Stop lying. You retract your statement apx 10 hours after you made your so called "gambit to see who's paying attention". If it was really a gambit, why would you reveal it right when only about 3 people have seen it. Sounds to me like you making justifications for your sorry self.
Lol Wut? Why the vote? ( Oh shit he's DayVig, get rid of him, GET RID OF HIM .. *subconciously votes* ... )Meransiel wrote:What the actual fuck?!petroleumjelly wrote:If you do not explain, I will DayVig you.
Unvote
Vote: petroleumjelly
Vote will be removed when you explain what the hell you did there.
Gah!! How many times do I have to say this. MBL said that he did what he did to see if people are paying attention to his predecessor ( AND NOT A JOKE ). But he revealed his card when only 3 people have commented on his post, implying that is not his underlying purpose at all. When I inquire him about this he ignores admist you guys talking about how it was an obvious joke. Reread him please.scotmany12 wrote: Point out where MBL has lied.
I'm not sure what to think of MBL's coaching. I'm more concerned with his coaching of Mozamis, because he seems pretty sure that Moz is scum.
mozamis wrote:@Meransial why do you now think I am scum?
ZOMG LYNCH LYNCH LYNCH this guy. There's no way a town can say this! That increase the probability that merensial is town tho.mozamis wrote:well, tell me why you are suspicious of me
lol scum self awareness. There's no way a town be so self conscious as to act this kind of questions. You are caught scum mozamis.mozamis wrote: I dont understand this. What do you mean "theres no way a town can say this?" I just asked Mernasial why he thinks I am scum. And then asked him to state his supicions (which he did). Why cant town say this?
And what do you mean by "fake claim". I haven't made a fake claim
!@#$%petroleumjelly wrote: Second, I am not convinced mozamis is scum, let alone "obvscum." I reread the entire game this morning (when I wrote up my MrBuddyLee vote), and although I think mozamis (and Meransiel) have done some fairly silly things, I am not convinced they are actually motivated by scummy reasons.
<3 you tooCogito Ergo Sum wrote:Vote: nopoint
Have you been skimming the thread?MrBuddyLee wrote: Nopoint clearly "protected" M&M by voting me for what you agree is a "terrible reason" when he thinks they're "obvious" scum.
I'm not wrong, I had fuking evidence. REPLY GODDAMMIT, why did you take back your so called "gambit" without everyone having seen it?that I lied, is wrong.
LOL when the wagons are scum wagons then WHY WOULDN'T I BE FINE WITH BEING ON THE LEADING WAGON. It seems like you are trying to disunify us right there.play surrounding the leading wagons is opportunistic, and the vote on mozamis is for a weird reason and not the first one I'd pick as primary evidence.
You override any scumminess ever created.MrBuddyLee wrote: Do you think nopoint is voting me for a good reason? If not, then is it reasonable to wonderwhyhe's voting me instead of the other people he claimed to find "scummy buddies"?
Your analogy stinks here unless you think my reason for voting OGML is as bad as nopoint's reason for voting me.
MrBuddyLee at Sat [u]10:26 pm[/u] wrote:I read my predecessor's post history and he looks like a total douchebag and obvious scum.
Hi, I'm replacing Magnetic. I replaced in because PJ asked me to and because Shanba is totally Shibby. Let's catch us some scum.
10 fucking hours with 3 comments in between. Do you think this guy is at all proud of his "smart-ass" comment, do you think it was meant to "scum-hunt"? The FACT is, MrBuddyLee (didn't pay attention, didn't read the thread) himself and made a mistake in his first post, then he goes on to bullshit this reason out as an excuse. He would not have explained it that soon had he really thought his gambit could catch scum. Since then, he has continually avoided my accusationMrBuddyLee at Sat Mar 19, 2011 [u]12:37 am[/u] wrote: I also checked the little dropdown at the bottom of the page and saw my predecessor hadn't posted in this game yet, so I made a smart-ass comment to see who was paying attention.
