--- @
UK
UK 470 wrote:So, yeah, happy?
I don't mind your RL situation, but see Rhinox 472.
Also, I love how evidently calling you on a lack of scumhunting is "going for the low-hanging fruit".
--- On
GreyICE
, with a side of Seraphim
I mentioned after LLD vs. Seraphim that I was more interested in looking elsewhere, and I lost interest. Part of that was because of Jahudo #11 and part of that was because of this:
Seraphim #39 wrote:I do, however, disagree about your conclusion, which shouldn't come as a shock. I personally think my wagon has stagnated and, with GreyICE removing his vote, has a high likelihood of stagnating and dying in not too long...or perhaps I'm a bit optimistic. But even then, it's clear that moving his vote to a new wagon looks pro-active and town and he certainly isn't harming himself by making a move like that.
which I agree with.
It's not that he's posted anything else better since then; no novellas full of reads and delicious morsels. I just don't care about him right now.
GreyICE 473 wrote:You have to go half way up her scum-town list to find someone she thought was "probably scum."
Forget the Boondock Saints av, you need a Glenn Beck av.
Or were you expecting me to list nine people as possible scum?
And how does that compare with, say,
your #12?
GreyICE 479 wrote:Vi claims he has a 'master plan'
...I do? I don't remember saying anything of the sort in the last ten pages
Blah blah GreyICE is still guilty of the false dilemma he's accusing Toasty of etc. etc. etc.
GreyICE 479 wrote:Toasty wrote:...these are the people he's called scum: Seraphim, Me, Jahudo, CES, Antitown, and Rhinox (says he's waffling on this one)
CES - Still posting crap in the thread, and no one can say otherwise.
Oh, this is you calling CES scum again.~
--- @
Jahudo
about UK
Jahudo - On UK -
*Lack of content for ~five days
**Including no
official
opinion of GreyICE given this quote
Vi #15 wrote:UK 274 wrote:I sympathize with Vi on this issue. I was basically in your
[GreyICE's]
shoes last game I played with her
[Vi, Objection! Redux]
, so.
And remind me of your alignment in that game.
[UK was scum in Objection! Redux; I was Town]
and engaging in a lengthy conversation vs. Rhinox about finding the case on GreyICE to be bad
*Votes on LLD and Seraphim wagons:
Vi #20 wrote:As mentioned before, I don't really agree with UK's reasons for voting LLD, though LLD validated the vote-based reason by jumping on CES soon afterward. I don't really mind LLD spending so much time defending the red text (since it DID become an issue) and as said before I got the opposite hunch on LLD's bounty talk.
(...)
UK voted because... I'm not sure, aside from calling LLD a rolefisher for asking for a claim.
and her parked vote on Seraphim
--- About
Vi
, specifically the case on me
Case on me:
1) IIoA, in re: wagon analyses
I did those
specifically because GreyICE asked me to do them.
Read that again.
I'm being accused of doing something by the person who asked me to do it.
As for it being useless in the end, it depends on who you're talking to. I figured out what CES was doing (I think), and it was what got me to start seriously looking at UK. If nothing else, it helped me. :\
2) Setup analysis that didn't end anywhere
Saying that it "kept going for pages" kind of ignores the fact that it was there for... two posts. And one more because Nacho+UK asked about it. And it's not like it was all I was doing during that time.
3) Lack of commitment - Actually not a bad accusation.
I don't have a lot of solid Town reads in this game, as my previous post suggests. Most of the people ITT choose not to converse like normal human beings. I've had to repeat myself over the course of the game in order to get people to answer my questions, and it's still not working. Given that I don't think most people here are terminally retarded, I'm left to assume that people are deliberately ignoring them (or giving nonanswers). I don't ask BAD questions; if I'm wrong on that, someone tell me. So my reads are for 10/13 people more or less guessing their motivations. The only thing I CAN do is keep trying to press people.
It doesn't help that I'm not dealing with this thread in anything close to real-time; distancing me from rapid repartee, giving me the chance to forget what I'm doing, and forcing me to make these silly wallposts. That's not something that can be helped right now though.
4) OMGUS
*looks at no small part of my previous posts*
Raise your hand if you buy this.
--- @
Kdub
Kdub 482 wrote:Hmm...he does seem to be more active elsewhere than here. I see why this could be suspicious, but didn't someone (it might have been you?) mention that he's played this way as town before?
I said that he trolls as any alignment, which has nothing to do with it.
So you're trying to pass it off as a null tell on someone you said you were leaning scum on. Is this correct?
--- @
Nacho
Nacho 489 wrote:Explain what you were trying to say with
[the ordering being roughly correct]
.
The words don't lie. I made that list late at night, came back to it in the morning and it still looked good. I didn't spend much time agonizing over whether LLD was scummier than Jahudo or anything like that. If I were to do it again I would add a | above Antitown.
Nacho 489 wrote:If there wasn't sense in waiting
[for Jahudo to make more scummy posts after announcing that I'm about to make a case on him]
, then I wouldn't be doing it.
1) I'm skeptical of any case that's made in advance of future posting (that isn't associated with policy lynching).
2) Given that I'm willing to put Jahudo on the Townshelf Today I'd rather hear what you have in nonvague terms.
3) I question if you have anything substantial right now.
Re: the Toastyquote - Okay, I do follow this time. But see below.
Re: My questions having any purpose - I'm assuming you're asking about the questions I asked you in the past.
*CES' reaction to your Jahudo vote, thoughts?
I asked that question largely because of how you immediately called CES Town afterward. Seeing the two posts side-by-side threw me, and I asked if the feedback from someone you thought was Town changed anything. In retrospect, and at risk of giving GreyICE more garbage to throw at me, that question was unnecessary.
*My
reaction to 382: "Sera, Toasty is just today's bounty, he's not actually scum."
Bewilderment at a comment that didn't make sense at the time.
Again, after spending about forty seconds thinking about it, this question was also unnecessary. But this implies that Toasty is Town... I guess I can go with that for the time being.
Regardless, that's... actually really terrible on my part. v.v
--- You know what this is
Rhinox 477 wrote:VI
Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.