Mini 1106 - No Exit Mafia

Xalxe · Post Post #2 (isolation #0) » Sat Jan 01, 2011 5:19 am

Oh, hey, it's open!

Also, vezokpriaka, usually they still win.

VOTE: RossWilliam for having the most henchman-sounding name.

Xalxe · Post Post #4 (isolation #1) » Sat Jan 01, 2011 5:55 am

Villain: Ross Villiam! Arm ze lazer!

RossVilliam: Right away, sir!

Plus, I can't vote for myself, cause I think Xalxe would be a sweet villain name too.

Xalxe · Post Post #14 (isolation #2) » Sat Jan 01, 2011 10:33 am

Guderian wrote:in much laughter is truth often spoken.

Profound.

Also, I concur that defending against a point that hasn't been made means you might be doing it wrong.

Xalxe · Post Post #16 (isolation #3) » Sat Jan 01, 2011 11:32 am

Shit, page 2 and a softclaim?

So, wait, DGB, are you still with us?

Xalxe · Post Post #20 (isolation #4) » Sat Jan 01, 2011 12:44 pm

As far as I'm concerned, the lack of nighttalk means less kills (hopefully).

Xalxe · Post Post #35 (isolation #5) » Mon Jan 03, 2011 8:45 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:In other news, Dark Horse is town, and I'm not voting him all game.

Broad statement. Better have a damn good reason.

In other news, I'm thrilled to be playing with DGB.

Xalxe · Post Post #42 (isolation #6) » Mon Jan 03, 2011 11:10 am

palmertrou wrote:(W.A.T.A.P.T.H?)

WHUZZAT?

Xalxe · Post Post #46 (isolation #7) » Mon Jan 03, 2011 11:27 am

palmertrou wrote:
Xalxe wrote:WHUZZAT?
It's a scum hunting tactic I have started to use. It's an unguessable abbreviation. It allows me to state what I'm talking about before the person I'm questioning knows what I'm talking about so I don't give them an 'easy out' as such. You'll see once my question is answered and, yes, I see the irony. If it puts your mind at ease I can point you to other examples in other games where I use such techniques. Maybe that way it'll be clearer as to why I use it.

Nah, already checked. But thanks for the 'splaination.

Xalxe · Post Post #56 (isolation #8) » Mon Jan 03, 2011 2:37 pm

DGB, would you please defend the statement you made?

Xalxe · Post Post #73 (isolation #9) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 1:30 am

Dark Horse wrote: If you want like, say, a character claim, I'm pretty sure DGB would be happy to tell.

Character claim?

Xalxe · Post Post #81 (isolation #10) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 9:24 am

Dark Horse wrote:
Xalxe wrote:
Dark Horse wrote: If you want like, say, a character claim, I'm pretty sure DGB would be happy to tell.
Character claim?
Claiming who you are, I.e a secret agent or something like that.

Are you expecting any claims other than secret agent? Because quite frankly, I think that's all we're gonna get.

Xalxe · Post Post #84 (isolation #11) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 1:13 pm

Dark Horse wrote:
Xalxe wrote:
Dark Horse wrote:
Xalxe wrote:
Dark Horse wrote: If you want like, say, a character claim, I'm pretty sure DGB would be happy to tell.
Character claim?
Claiming who you are, I.e a secret agent or something like that.
Are you expecting any claims other than secret agent? Because quite frankly, I think that's all we're gonna get.
Think for a second.

Please

That doesn't answer the question.

Xalxe · Post Post #86 (isolation #12) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 1:18 pm

Guderian wrote:No massive quote pyramids please.

How fast would be people be willing to get a day one lynch/wagon underway?

Sorry, everyone's tolerance is different (and mine's probably at about that last post).

Also, if we have a reasonable case, then I say go for it. Haven't really seen one yet though.

Xalxe · Post Post #101 (isolation #13) » Wed Jan 05, 2011 1:59 am

veridis wrote:
Xalxe wrote:Are you expecting any claims other than secret agent? Because quite frankly, I think that's all we're gonna get.
I'm hoping DGB doesn't claim super-spy, she's previously softclaimed a PR.
Character claim is looking for the extra flavour in her role PM, the theme reason for her hated townie role.
From this I'm pretty confident saying you're vanilla or scum.

Oh, see, I would have called this a flavor claim, not a character claim. Difference in terminology, sorry. Carry on.

palmertrou wrote:I really don't like this jester speculation, it really muddy's the thread and clear lines of thought. IMO if someone is acting scummy and they are lynch flipped as jester then that's just crappy luck.

Just for clarification though, town can still 'win' if a jester is lynched right?

You're right. No, town usually loses.

@Mod: Votecount pleaseums

Xalxe · Post Post #113 (isolation #14) » Wed Jan 05, 2011 9:17 am

Ghostlin wrote:@vezo: You wanted to make this obvious...for fun. And yet, when someone did the same thing, you call them scum. Does anyone else that's not me see that as hypocritical at best, trying to write this off as a joke at worst while hiding the innate scummiest within?

I do.

Xalxe · Post Post #155 (isolation #15) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:29 am

I doubt that there are third party roles TBQH, though I believe there are probably power roles.

The question that will need to be asked upon PR claims is whether or not it fits with the flavor. i.e. I would have a tough time believing any tracker or watcher claims, as we all can see each other in our little glass boxes.

Xalxe · Post Post #171 (isolation #16) » Sat Jan 08, 2011 6:33 am

palmertrou wrote: @ Jester, I stated a slight town read from his reaction to my coding trap.
I figured that i'd throw out that abbreviation hoping that scum would try and paint me as scum for using it after dark horse pointed out that scum could be using code. Xalxe picked up on it straight away and rather than trying to paint me as scum for it he did his research on me to find out himself. I don't think scum would've dropped it so quickly or done their research there.

That reminds me. Did you ever tell us what that meant?

Xalxe · Post Post #173 (isolation #17) » Sat Jan 08, 2011 7:11 am

DGB ANSWER PALMERTROU--

Woah. Fate, is that what you do all the time. Yikes.

Xalxe · Post Post #175 (isolation #18) » Sat Jan 08, 2011 7:19 am

...Fate's not even in this game.

I've been reading too many of his games lately, that's for sure.

Xalxe · Post Post #196 (isolation #19) » Sun Jan 09, 2011 7:45 am

DGB, I belive the issue is that we don't believe in your "amazing powers," much like I no longer believe in the Easter Bunny.

Xalxe · Post Post #203 (isolation #20) » Sun Jan 09, 2011 3:21 pm

I would like to say that I do not concur with the palmertrou lynch.

However, I'm okay for a vezo lynch, and I'm not really feeling a RossWilliam lynch.

P-EDIT: Oh, look, I'm not voting. I'll fix that.

VOTE: vezokpiraka

Xalxe · Post Post #248 (isolation #21) » Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:05 am

AAAH WHAT HAPPENED DELETED POSTS?!?

Xalxe · Post Post #249 (isolation #22) » Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:06 am

Oh, wait.

I fail.

Never mind. Carry on. I mixed up two games.

Xalxe · Post Post #306 (isolation #23) » Sat Jan 15, 2011 2:41 am

UNVOTE: vezokpiraka

I am no longer comfortable with this vote.

This afternoon, I will read the suspects in iso and place a better vote.

Xalxe · Post Post #308 (isolation #24) » Sat Jan 15, 2011 4:46 am

palmertrou wrote:Been busy lately so I haven't done the re-read and musings I promised I'd do. However I'll disclose the abbreviation now because it seems that DGB is refusing to explain
any
reads, not just the initial dark horse town read. 'Just my amazing town-detecting powers at work' doesn't cut it for me. Still think something fishy is going on.

W.A.T.A.P.T.H? = We are talking about post thirty right?

... well I don't know why DGB first claimed dark horse 'is town' and 'will not be voting him all game'. I thought it could be this but as I said before, it's why I think Dark horse is probably town. I didn't want to give DGB an easy out here by just agreeing.

Palmertrou. Right does not start with H.

Xalxe · Post Post #323 (isolation #25) » Sun Jan 16, 2011 3:33 am

Shit, 48 hours?

In the interest of blocking a no lynch, I will read RW and then (unless there's something really good) vote for him.

Xalxe · Post Post #324 (isolation #26) » Sun Jan 16, 2011 3:50 am

You know what? I won't vote RossWilliam. I see nothing at all scummy in his ISO other than voting for DGB, who is the current "Queen." That's the only reason I can figure out why DGB wants him lynched; he has a brain.

I ain't doin it.

Xalxe · Post Post #326 (isolation #27) » Sun Jan 16, 2011 4:29 am

Way to backtrack and make crap up when I call you on it, DGB.

If I was scum, I'd jump on the wagon.

Xalxe · Post Post #328 (isolation #28) » Sun Jan 16, 2011 5:10 am

I never implied it was.

Xalxe · Post Post #331 (isolation #29) » Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:28 am

No, I'd prefer we lynch today by all means; I said that earlier.

But I'm not okay with someone who I feel positive is a townie. It would be different if it were a case of "eh, I'm not positive they're town," but I'm pretty sure on RW.

Xalxe · Post Post #338 (isolation #30) » Sun Jan 16, 2011 11:23 am

Dark Horse wrote:Xalxe, why are you so certain Ross is town?

His posts have always held content. He's not committed any major scumtells. He's backed up his vote.

Why is DGB town?

Xalxe · Post Post #341 (isolation #31) » Sun Jan 16, 2011 12:40 pm

DrippingGoofball wrote:Xalxe, how come you're not voting?

Because a vote on you probably wouldn't get the other scum to come a-runnin' while you and your buddies have a world of possibilities.

Xalxe · Post Post #343 (isolation #32) » Sun Jan 16, 2011 1:06 pm

Not that I've found.

Xalxe · Post Post #355 (isolation #33) » Mon Jan 17, 2011 2:52 am

Well done all.

Really, fantastic job.

Somebody kill DGB for me.

Xalxe · Post Post #357 (isolation #34) » Mon Jan 17, 2011 3:01 am

Xalxe wrote:Well done all.

Really, fantastic job.

Somebody kill DGB for me.

Xalxe · Post Post #920 (isolation #35) » Wed Feb 23, 2011 11:50 am

*applause*

Xalxe · Post Post #933 (isolation #36) » Wed Feb 23, 2011 11:45 pm

The Jester wrote:

Xalxe misspelled RossWilliam as RossVilliam in post 4. It's funny the misspelling was a scum-tell and town did it too.

I did? Whoops, I'm usually so good about that...oh, wait, #4? I vos usink my akzent.