Mini 1080 -- txtMafia -- Game OVER

[kunkstar7]

Sorry didn't expect this to begin over the weekend.

@Mod: V/LA for the next two days.

Will catch up / respond when I return.

Noted. ~~NS

[kunkstar7]

Anti: Fonz hasn't been doing what? If its scumhunting I disagree.
TBQH I don't think Tasky is scummy for the V/LA vote.

[kunkstar7]

His "explaining his playstyle" seems much more like badtown to me, unless he's playing newbscum, but banking on the first.

[kunkstar7]

@Herodotus, scum is: Korts for fishystuff, this post is the only reasoning I see from him. He also switches away and back to fishy when everyone hops to tasky.

[kunkstar7]

I can also see crywolf at a lesser degree for the "active lurking", buts that weaker than Korts.

Vote:Korts.

[kunkstar7]

@Equinox: Is your vote on mothrax solely because of his the way he FoS'ed? Tasky's vote of AV is terribad and is pointless. Rayfrost same but not obv about it.

[kunkstar7]

Your may say your vote has merit, but I see absolutely no reasoning put forth, so its in the same league as Tasky's vote, abeit less blatant about it.

[kunkstar7]

Meh, I disagree here. Agree with Fonz though on AV not "active lurking". His questions have purpose.

[kunkstar7]

Hero, do you think that Fonz's point of crywolf active lurking is not valid or that it isn't enough for a vote?

[kunkstar7]

@Hero, the "this post" doesn't tell me anything about why you suddenly switched to the mothrax wagon. It only implies a vote due to lack of activity?

[kunkstar7]

@Tasky: tired of the votes for the hell of it. Explain them.

[kunkstar7]

@Fishy, no opinions of Fonz at all?, what about the push on crywolf for inactivity? Also what is your opinion of Korts so far this game?

[kunkstar7]

Mod: LA till Sunday. Likely going to be a reoccurring theme.

[kunkstar7]

Then what is wrong with Fonz's push on crywolf for similar? Mothrax can be said to be in the same position as crywolf, yet you decried Fonz's push there.

[kunkstar7]

Meh, not sure what happened here. The Fonz and cry look townish for last few responses to stuff, removing vote until replacement.

Unvote.

[kunkstar7]

@Antihero : Why was/is Equinox scum?

[kunkstar7]

Vote: Tasky.

I can be down with this. His relying on perceived meta is not working out for me. He lost his bumbling town read from the V/LA vote.

[kunkstar7]

I meant that his vote on me when I went V/LA and a few posts after gave me a "bad"town read on Tasky. He has reversed this with his play now.

[kunkstar7]

I asked you because you stated there was nothing of note, so I wanted to see if you actually had a read on The Fonz.

[kunkstar7]

@Antihero: Banked meant "leaning towards". Not as in I could bank all my money on it. TBC

[kunkstar7]

Tasky switch in read is because of the sudden switch from AV/The Fonz (until 26 he was gungho AV, then switches vote suddenly at 26 for no mentioned reasoning)

[kunkstar7]

He then backs out on his AV certainty. His whole TF push looks more likely reacting to the Fonz pressuring him rather than actual scumhunting.

[kunkstar7]

Yes he is.

[kunkstar7]

Voting w/o reasons is scummy since you can wagon w/o committing, wagoning only to mislynch. Didn't change, simply it alone wasn't strong enough for a vote.

[kunkstar7]

So, obv claim VT.
Antihero looks town, for the reaction testing.
Was gonna vote AV but I don't believe he is scum at all, so I see no point in pushing it.

[kunkstar7]

Vi hasn't really done anything to redeem Korts in my view, so she's likely late scum trying to get on meh wagon.