Sucks to be you.
Not familiar with source material.
Actually my point is quite relevant. Shanba is implying that the player list is "too good" or whatever for Exe to try something so stupid. However, such a proposition hinges on Exe knowing the player list and having the same assumption that players are "too good" to fall for it. It's already obvious that Exe doesn't know who I am, so my question was certainly within the bounds of reason.Flameaxe wrote:The same thing everyone knows. The other players in the game.
Answer the question.
Well, early game and all. Things have to start somewhere and I'm generally not the type of person to piddle around with "maybes" and "could be"s. Whether it is a stupid plan that is destined to fail (and you're correct about that), it is certainly a plan that benefits scum more than town. Therein lies my issue with it. I've played more than one game where the scum suggested we game the setup as a way to detract from actual scumhunting. I'm ashamed to say that at times as town I've even agreed with this process. Now, Exe didn't exactly present his plan in well thought out manner, so of course it's unlikely to succeed. But the end sum remains that if his plan were to be followed, it would almost certainly benefit the scum more. True or false?Shanba wrote:I'm simply going to ask you how you can possibly think that is scummy?
lol, bussing on page two for no explicable reason? cool.JD wrote:No setting yourself up for accolades tomorrow. We're not working like that. You're coming across more likely as someone trying to push an efficient bus on a stupid partner than you are coming across as someone who should YEAH BE REWARDED.
Pretty sure he was saying that a noob would look at join dates and assume a certain level of skill...but if I'm wrong then Shanba can clarify what exactly he meant. If not, then we're talking about two different things altogether because that's what I was referring to.Jd wrote:Did he say that it would be indicative of skill level? He said experience.
+1Kast wrote:f you think someone is scum, vote for them. If you think the person is scum AND you think the rest of town is unlikely to follow you, it's your duty as a townie to explain what you see and convince others to vote for the scum you found. The whole "I think he is scum, but I won't vote because nobody else believes me" line of reasoning is BS and anti-town.
What reactions have you garnered now that you've finished with that? Have you come to any conclusions?Exe wrote:The earlier suggestion had two purposes: to garner reactions and to get us out of the RVS. The contradiction with my current opinions is because the earlier (like most of my actions) was a way to get reactions.
Blah blah blah. Do you think I'm scummy or not? All this sounds like is, "I'm worried how people will react"...which pardon me, but is not a town mindset.Exe wrote:What little pressure it put would most likely give me the reaction of VPB calling OMGUS, regardless of whether he is town or scum, so voting him will not help me read him at the moment.
Seemed answered to me. I don't understand what's unclear. It was a faulty question to begin with, which I pointed out. Then when an answer was demanded (ooo scary), I answered said faulty question anyhow. If you want more, you're going to have to get specific.FlameAxe wrote:I like how you still haven't answered the question in this post.
Well, I'll warn you now. There are going to be times in this game when I agree with other people. I know it's a crazy concept on the internetz and all, but it happens. You should probably prepare yourself now.Flameaxe wrote:VPB does agree rather than parrot. Not that I'm too keen on that either, but still.
No, it really doesn't. It's a pretty dumb argument to make actually, as it rarely happens. My response was more than sufficient. If Exe is lynched and flips scum, you're damn right I'll take credit for it.Flameaxe wrote:This reply seems pretty off to me. If anything, I'd say JD has a semi-respectable point, and certainly warrants more of a response than this.
orly? do tell. Quotes from 61 are acceptable.shanba wrote:your post 61 suggests that you think Exe is very likely scum
But my point is: does Exe know this? Not: does Shanba know this?Shanba wrote:we're talking about a level of skill high enough to know that the suggested plan is a bad one, which I would argue nearly all players of two to three years mafia experience would have.
Oh, they happen. I'm not entirely denying it. I'm simply saying that the form they are proposing is 1) unlikely 2) shitty play as scum. I tend to try not not playing shittily, but they're entitled to believe as they like.Kast wrote:This chance is high enough that Exe flipping scum should not be considered "proof" that you are a townie. I'm not sure what kind of response Flameaxe is expecting (what can someone do other than deny the actuality of that possibility?), but it does not seem like you are acknowledging any possibility of an early scum bus.
I don't necessarily agree with you that the setup gives that much incentive to scum to bus. Just as policy lynching a potential town member doesn't give that much benefit to the town. You're still losing a team member in that situation and making your life harder. So, if I had to quantify it, I would say that maybe scum would bus earlier in this setup, but I highly doubt it would be from page 2.Kast wrote:How likely do you think it is that scum could/would bus in this game?
Not heavily, no. I think the most I ever bussed was in Vi's Mafia at the 11th Hour and that was really only because my partners gave up on the first day. If you look at that game though, you can see that I repeatedly tried to give my partners outs. I'm the type that only busses if it's absolutely necessary to keep the scum team alive.Kast wrote:Is bussing a strategy you employ as scum (examples appreciated but not necessary)?
I answered pretty clearly what his intentions as scum would have been in post 45. Here, I shall quote to make it easier for you:Flameaxe wrote:Not underlined: The part I feel is still not adequately discussed from you.
Which actually wasn't rhetorical and was never replied to...but whatever.VP Baltar post 45 wrote:Whether it is a stupid plan that is destined to fail (and you're correct about that), it is certainly a plan that benefits scum more than town. Therein lies my issue with it. I've played more than one game where the scum suggested we game the setup as a way to detract from actual scumhunting. I'm ashamed to say that at times as town I've even agreed with this process. Now, Exe didn't exactly present his plan in well thought out manner, so of course it's unlikely to succeed. But the end sum remains that if his plan were to be followed, it would almost certainly benefit the scum more. True or false?
Do you think I've been "excessively agreeing" with people this game? I'd argue that I haven't.Flameaxe wrote:Clarification: Agreeing is fine, excessively agreeing and using said agreement as a way to push a lynch is bad. In some ways I see this, which is why I said it was "not as much parroting as it is agreeing, not something I'm keen on". Clarification success?
Well, in fairness, it is a really weak point. How likely do you think it would be for scum to bus each other hard from page 2? Do you think the benefits so outweigh losing a player from the start? If you do think that, why did you disagree with Exe's policy lynch of Ani? Wouldn't "bussing" a town player benefit the town just as much as it would the scum doing it to one of their own? I stand by my point that intentionally losing a player for no reason other than to (potentially) gain powers is a sum loss game and a terribly weak argument to accuse me of. Yes? No? Maybe so?Flameaxe wrote:I forgot the part where YOU know what I feel is off. My bad, brah. This post just makes you seem like an arrogant twat, and an idiotic one at that. You can take as much credit for an Exe scum flip, that doesn't make you in any way cleared of bussing. Simply replying to any possible point of bussing with "Nuh uh, that's stupid", (which is an exaggerated simplification of your post, but gives the exact same impact) is not sufficient
Or it rarely happens. I don't need statistics to prove that scum don't often bus each other from page 2. I think the onus is on you to prove ridiculous arguments, not on me to disprove them. So, yeah.JD wrote:"It rarely happens" is not a defense, it's an appeal to made-up, unsubstantiated and unseen numbers. You're coming across as self-interested, which is generally not a good thing™
Example(s) of you bussing from page 2. Please. Also, I'm not you. BTW. FYI.JD wrote:I've done it before when I felt that said scum partner would be more of a liability than an asset.
I don't understand your point really other than trying to use buzzwords. I stated that your argument was highly illogical for me as scum. It takes a great deal of hyperbole to turn that into "extreme self-interest" by any stretch of the imagination.JD wrote:your extreme self-interest
It was brought up by Kast (iirc), not you. Try reading the thread prior to typing.JD wrote:You're also warping the point to one about gaining powers, which I at very least never mentioned nor even thought of.
Well, yes, obviously scum are going to try things they think will slip past. I get what you're saying, but (and this is sort of what I was getting at with Shanba) it requires an assumption about Exe's notions on the player list, which in my opinion could go either way.Erg0 wrote:Would you say that the scum in these games genuinely believed that they were going to be able to slip their scum-favouring plan past the town? Based on the second sentence, at least some of these plans must have been halfway feasible.
You know, just for reference so people can see how hyperbolic you're being, let's look at what I actually said.JD wrote:Yes, but with the added qualification that setting yourself up to create such false proof is not a good thing™.
Based on this sentence, I was clearly so over the top trying to buy town points in my fourth post of the game that I have summarily outted myself as scum. That is the actual argument you are trying to push here? On a scale of 1-10, how serious do you think I was being when I wrote this?VPBaltar wrote:Also, after we lynch you and you flip scum, I deserve a medal for quickest scum outing evva.
In some cases, certainly. However, what also serves its purpose. My point is that you largely ignore what altogether, which I guess is what you think is good scum hunting. I fundamentally disagree with that. ie, saying things doesn't make them true. Evidence is helpful.JD wrote:Why is a much better question than what for the sort of reasoning that goes into a mafia game, don't you think?
This is only in regards to my comments about Exe?Kast wrote:I'll prolly pay extra attention to VPB. Right now the strongest impression I have from this game is that VPB has been pushing an "anti-town = scummy" train despite being a good enough (and cynical enough) to know that's not any more true or likely than "anti-town = bad/weak player".
Just because I think something is legit doesn't mean other people will. I actually have a long track record (read: most every game I'm town and play aggressively) where I push on something in the early game and then towns go 'OMG that is so not scumhunting Vote:VPB'. It's the natural ebb and flow of things and it doesn't really bother me because more often than not, I'm right about what I'm pushing. So, that's how it's reconciled. Re: the reason for that line - I was pointing out that Exe was more conscious of how he was being perceived than he was about hunting scum. I was using myself as an example of what I expect town play to be. If you're reading the quote in context with Exe's post, it should be quite clear what the message was there.Fishy wrote:I don't feel this squares very well with his earlier post on the matter (45) - in that, I got the impression that VP very much thought his vote was legitimate, and that doesn't tie in very well with thinking people would call it crap logic. I also just don't see what this passage is doing in his post at all, except to say "I don't care how I look! Isn't that townie of me?".
Honestly, it's hard to say right now. I feel like everyone but myself, Flameaxe and possibly Exe are playing an extremely guarded game. Everyone's too afraid to put their opinions really out there or have ideas different from the mob mentality. Right now I would say Shanba feels odd, but I can't really quantify why and I really don't have enough playing experience with him. I feel like I've asked him several questions that he's basically ignored, but I need to go back and read to see if that's true or not. Kast and Erg0 feel somewhat town to me on initial reactions. You, DDD and JDodge are pretty much playing to how I would expect at this point regardless of alignment.Fishy wrote:@VP: in addition to any comments you have on the above, who do you think is scum atm?
I'm rather confused what you're trying to attack eldarad about here. So, because he doesn't like the Baltar or Exe wagons he's being indecisive? I'm not sure wanting a different wagon falls into the category of indecisiveness.Exe wrote: Your lack of decisiveness is noted. But:
Hop on the Erg0 wagon -- scum lynch is a go.
Why do you think this now?Shanba wrote:he's [Kast] preparing to move on to the VP wagon which I am convincing myself is probably just an enticing townie lynch
Actually, what you said was:Shanba wrote:What I'm getting at is that I can't reconcile your claim that it's just an early game wagon with some of the rhetoric you've been spouting.
Which, doesn't really jive at all with what I said in post 61 (which you just quoted above). That's why I wanted you to quote specifically whatever you were getting at...I didn't see that at all when I reread 61. Now you're saying you're just speaking generally about "some of the rhetoric" I've said. Why did you refer to post 61 specifically if you were only speaking generally?Shanba wrote:your post 61 suggests that you think Exe is very likely scum
I don't think that was answered...though maybe I missed it.VP Baltar wrote:Hmm, interesting thought, so Shanba how do you resolve Exe going for reactionlulz with his policy lynch proposition when you think he's aware enough to know that the plan in reality would not happen? Doesn't the experience of the player list also suggest that such an obviously bad plan would not garner any useful reactions?
Is this something you typically do? Do you find this to be a useful tool for the town in outting scum early?Fishy wrote:if anything I wanted to give the impression I found it more damning than I really did, because I felt the pressure I was applying was useful.
Eh. I think "rich content" is a bit of an exaggeration honestly. I agree that he needs to probably start pressuring someone soon, but I also feel that there isn't a ton to go on yet. 25% of the game isn't posting seriously yet and another 50% is being rather guarded with how they are pursuing this game. It's just where the chips are at right now, imo.Exe wrote:@VPB (and sort of at eldarad):
Seriously? Eldarad is "looking elsewhere" but hasn't actually found anything else to pursue. He is not favoring my wagon, and yet his posts ignore most other people. We have 6 pages of rich content, he should be able to give us an actual suspect not "I'm looking elsewhere."
Kind of curious why you were up my arse for pressuring Exe then. You said that you were confused why I was having any kind of doubts about my case when my early rhetoric was strongly worded, right?Fishy wrote: I try to go after someone quite hard towards the beginning of a game. If I can find a really good reason for going after them, great. If not, I'm happy to plump for a mediocre reason, and push it harder than it would deserve later in the game (though I'm almost certain I've never pushed something I don't find a scumtell). I have to admit that I haven't analysed the outcomes of this approach - I'm really still relying on what I believe should happen. I think people will react more to cases on them that look serious, and that other people will tend to comment on them more. It's a fairly obvious idea, really - early cases are almost bound to be weak, because there's not much information around. But admitting they are weak just tells the wagonee not to worry.
This is barely coherent and starting to be pretty irrelevant to the game at this point. Do you have an actual conclusion or were you just arguing because you thought I was being too decisive?JD wrote:The issue is your entire point only proves it is unlikely, not impossible. I like unlikely. Scum like to do unlikely things for them, it's how you work the site meta.
I'm not ignoring what, but evidence is pointless in the long-term; speculation is the only main tool of the town.
Thank you for reviving this.JD wrote:Would you say he's more potato or pancake?
Additionally, why the fuck are you voting Exe?VP wrote:JD - What do you think of Shanba's play so far this game? You hinted earlier that he was feeling slightly off I think, do you have a town, neutral or scum read on him at this point?
You need to learn to read between the lines. My basic feeling about Shanba is that he was really treading water this game until just recently when the wagon formed on him. We're now seeing life in him with Kast...but even that's kind of a subpar case. Maybe it's because I have experience with Kast, but walls of questions from him that don't seem very guided are kind of his thing. He like lots of information piled up in the thread that he can later reference. I think even a cursory meta of him shows this. I think Shanba isn't really the type of player you can say "XYZ is the case, vote now!" because he's too careful. I think it was Hell Aboard the Purple Flower I played with him as scum and really the only reason he was outted as scum was a cop investigation. It's gut feeling with Shanba and I'm not liking it this game. Do you think he's played a very town game so far?Flameaxe wrote:I suggest you truly look at the "reasoning" for everyone on this Shanba wagon, it's horrifically weak. Tunnel vision? Really? Try better. VP's reason, from what I can tell, is that the wagon is "very win". DDD: Correct arguments, flimsy "subreasoning", no elaboration.
His continued absence in this thread may win me over to your side sooner rather than later. Stay tuned!Fishy wrote:I'd still like an Erg0 wagon.
What the fuck are you talking about? I've barely mentioned you in any kind of serious suspicion. I called you out for lurking...which you were doing. Feel free to explain where you get the vibe that I'm "riding [you] as hard asJDodge wrote:VP, Kast: you both seem to be intent on riding me as hard as you can, so can you give an actual, single statement on your opinions on me at this point in time so that I don't have to continue to wade through the swirling morass of rotting vegetation that is this game right now, thanks
Well, in reality, you've begun 99% of any arguments I've been engaged in with you. Frankly, I don't really care about you at this point. You're playing the game I expect you to play right now...which really says nothing about your alignment. Hence the reason I haven't said all that much about it.JD wrote:you never mentioned me whatsoever aside from arguing against me
Actually, what you said was 'dunno about the claim, gotta reread', implying that you had some uncertainty about what he was claiming. There was nothing there to imply you're looking at connections. Then you followed that up by saying I was essentially not considering the claim enough. Now you're saying it's not about the claim, but about the connections. Well, which is it? Why did you have such an issue with what I said about his claim? What is your actual opinion of it?RayFrost wrote:[insert snark here]
What I'm trying to do in reading through this is figure out connections of shanba to anybody else before the lynch to keep in mind (reasons for voting/not voting, you know... the usual stuff). I'm still going to vote him, but I want everybody's opinion on the claim before going yaylynch.
My general impression is that most everyone has theOman in Mini Theme queue wrote:Utopia Mafia is based on an analysis I ran a while back about the difference between individual and team play. In Utopia mafia, the game may start out with not a lot of power either side, but as one side starts to lose members and become closer to defeat, they become more and more powerful. Would you knowingly lynch a team-mate to increase powerroles for the rest of your team?
I don't know the games. So, I can only go on what I read:eldarad wrote:There are elves and dark elves in Utopia, but one isn't good and the other evil, as the concepts don't exist.
Nerd factory Wiki wrote:Dark Elves - Subterranean counterpart of the Elves, the Dark Elves are also known for their magical abilities and areevil individuals that like suffering and pain.
I disagree. I don't think this is a semi-open setup other than we know good stuff happens to the losing faction. My point is that you're saying Shanba's role PM has to be in agreement with the PM in the OP, and I'm saying no it doesn't necessarily. Also, Shanba said that heKast wrote:We're essentially playing a semi-open role game and Shanba is claiming something that contradicts the open part of semi-open.
You know what's stupid, lynching Exe when he was fucking obvious town. But it's cool, the way the scum came in to push that lynch through to save Shanba makes me even more confident in my read.Flameaxe wrote:The consistent wanting to lynch a potential doctor is stupid guys. Vague role or not, its a terrible idea. Come on. It's pretty clear Shanba doesn't have the same PM as the rules post, does that make him scum? No. It makes him not a vanilla townie. I don't see what's so hard to comprehend here.
lol, what? What reason do you have to believe Shanba over Exe in terms of the claim? You're either an idiot or scum.Flameaxe wrote:I am voting for Exe because I have very little reason to believe his claim is true, and much more reason to believe Shanba's. It's that simple.
I suppose. Regardless, we know now that Shanba is prob scum from the way this last minute Exe train came through and Shanba basically lurked his ass off to avoid being lynched. It's a good thing we're probably going to get some power because this town isn't going to outwit anyone anytime soon.Kast wrote:@VPB-
Shanba said his role PM states he can protect against thieves and magic. He did not make a flavor guess or interpretation or anything like that; he claims his actual role PM states a game mechanic of being able to protect others when things get bad for town.
It makes no sense to tell one individual player that he would gain a specific power, but not tell that to anyone else and to publicly share that people will not be specifically informed beyond what they can guess from the source link.
I didn't agree with his interpretation. Read the thread. Nor was I even fucking talking about Kast. I asked you when you are comparing Exe's claim to Shanba's, what grounds do you have to believe Shanba over Exe? Feel free to answer this time.Flameaxe wrote:The fact that no one in this game can pick up on anything at all is astounding. Kast's representation of the town PM is incorrect people. Learn it. Live it. Figure it out.lol, what? What reason do you have to believe Shanba over Exe in terms of the claim? You're either an idiot or scum.