I figure I would vote him before he gets replaced.
REPLACED AS PER ALWAYS.
There is so much wrong with this post not apparent with a first glance.Nikanor wrote:Aw man, THAT'S who I should have picked!SPS wrote:That'll put the fear of God into him.
Vote: SocioPath.
What are you doing with your vote on RayFrost? Are you pressuring him to replace out or something?
Oooor Nik knew exactly what he was doing when he posted his post.LlamaFluff wrote:You say that he is refusing to explain the vote, so I would for one be putting a whole lot of pressure on the fact that he is not expanding on the vote. Trying to see if its serious, if it is for what reasons, etc. Randomly voting a new player (massive pet peeve of mine to start) is the last thing I would consider doing.
The problem is that "reads" aren't always town based.LlamaFluff wrote:I feel my reads are better when I actually know more about the thought process of players and Im not sure I have whats happening here right.
There is the post.Nikanor wrote:Aw man, THAT'S who I should have picked!SPS wrote:That'll put the fear of God into him.
Vote: SocioPath.
What are you doing with your vote on RayFrost? Are you pressuring him to replace out or something?
What is with this questioning?Nikanor wrote:Vote: SocioPath.
What are you doing with your vote on RayFrost?
How can a non-entity be pressured to do anything?Nikanor wrote:Are you pressuring him to replace out or something?
So...Nik calls ME out for voting someone not here due to lack of confirming...but right here saysNikanor wrote:Aw man, THAT'S who I should have picked!SPS wrote:That'll put the fear of God into him.
U MAD?UncertainKitten wrote:See, as it stands I'm leaning more scummy on you, SP. But you're just this guy, see, and you always are scummy. So, a little more arguing should help me figure out if you are crazy awesome town SP or disruptively annoying scum SP. Fortunately, I have a lot of scum SP to look at. Seems you draw scum a lot.
Wat.LlamaFluff wrote:Want to see a response to my last post by SP before I decide what I do next.
One time?SpyreX wrote:AND MAKE A MISTAKE ONE TIME
You said you wanted me to respond to your last post.LlamaFluff wrote:*STUFF*SocioPath wrote:Wat.LlamaFluff wrote:Want to see a response to my last post by SP before I decide what I do next.
NOT TODAY.magnus_orion wrote:sociopath, cause he's hard to read, in my experience.
RF is a flaky flake.LlamaFluff wrote:I never saw anything about RF being V/LA
This line of thought is dumb and misleading. In-joke? Quit trying to lace posts with devenomizing words.LlamaFluff wrote:So you compared flaky to V/LA? You also already said that it wasnt an in-joke between you and Nik, which at this point it apparently was.SocioPath wrote:RF is a flaky flake.LlamaFluff wrote:I never saw anything about RF being V/LA
Its not that he isn't V/LA. Its that he likely isn't in the game at all.
And I have done the same votes against him before.
And he did end up getting replaced.
And Nik was in that game.
So that might be what Nik is trying to get at.
Especially since the replacement caused Nik to lose.
Its not a joke.LlamaFluff wrote:How is basing a (somewhat joking) vote on something that only Nik would know not an in-joke? I reacted to what looked like a baseless attack, and you responded as if I should have known of the event that I had no good way of knowing of.SocioPath wrote:This line of thought is dumb and misleading. In-joke? Quit trying to lace posts with devenomizing words.
magnus_orion wrote:@sociopath:/\magnus_orion wrote:I humbly demand that sociopath please make a response to my comment, preferably of an elucidating variety.
/\SocioPath wrote:And for MO: I'm not going to respond to your silliness, when you call me out on my conclusions...and yet Nik doesn't.
Obviously they aren't completely invalid, or Nik would have been the first in line to clarify.
No its not.Amished wrote:Socio's end of 117 is completely bogus. Because one person doesn't refute your shitty points doesn't mean that they aren't shitty.
Nice misrep.LlamaFluff wrote:Ok fine, inside-information if you really insist upon it. What is not changing is that you were basing it on something that I did not, and could not have known, yet turning around and attacking me like I should have.
What the fuck are you even talking about.Amished wrote:So.. other people can't comment on your shitty points? Just because Nik didn't refute it doesn't mean they didn't deserve to be refuted.
I found YOU in LRC v1.Amished wrote:No, because I believe you're more likely to stick a fork in a light socket than to find scum.
This is a blatant lie.Amished wrote:You found Ray, not me.
Don't say this directly after saying this:Amished wrote:Besides, fuckall @ meta.
But you did convince me for now.Amished wrote:No, because I believe you're more likely to stick a fork in a light socket than to find scum.
Shut up Ed, your hypocrisy is showing.Amished wrote:Yep, more likely to find a fork in a light socket than scum. That was based on this game, not any meta.
Stop acting like its a requirement that should know such in the first place.LlamaFluff wrote:I shouldnt have to spend four pages of the game guessing what convoluted reason you are voting me for.
And Merkabah in Portal?Amished wrote:I forgot about the other game I was in with SocioPath
Still wrong to the point of a blatant lie.Amished wrote:Ray was posting when UK and SP hopped on him as us-scum (we were a hydra).
SpyreX wrote:Now see, as Lord Meta-Hater, Ph.D I can get behind this normally but considering what else you were talking about no way is that a self-contained statement.
Why in the hell would you lie about it?
Unvote, Vote: Amished
HOPE YOU GOT YOUR FORKS READY.UncertainKitten wrote:Either way, not like Amished at this time.
I was half expecting this to be blue.UncertainKitten wrote:Or so I heard.
That only covers the last paragraph.Amished wrote:@SP: I did. It made logical sense to me; seeing two like situations (both attacking SPS for the dayprotect thing) and only seeing one person get attacked for it. From there, the person being attacked is most likely town and scum are generating the attack since it's not a bilateral attack (and the other attacker of SPS is therefore scum). That's half the reason I've switched my vote to RC off of SPS, because it made sense both logically and in mafia-context.
This.UncertainKitten wrote:Hmmmmmmmm...
Not liking Amished's latest post at all.
But not this.UncertainKitten wrote:But I'm also slightly more convinced of RC scum by it.
What does this red text mean?SocioPath wrote:Broadcast: Using the base 10 number system, of my last 3 votes, what is the number of those 3 that were placed on a non-town player?
SocioPath gains a point for being a smartass.
And specific questions will lead to points.magnus_orion wrote:One is red, the other is blue. Unspecific questions yield unspecific answers.
She is saying there is a mod group fan club where all of them take things from the others because they like their styles and ideas.Amished wrote:Ok, so you don't believe that Syke is .. the author? The stereotypical murdered host? I'm not sure what you were trying to say with your speculation.
Your handling of Spy is scummy.SaintKerrigan wrote:Why is my handing of the defense of Amished scummy?
This question with numbers gets multiple answers, and yet the first one was otherwise.SocioPath wrote:Broadcast: What is the number of differing win conditions in this game?
I would say at least two.
Between two and ten.
And this part:magnus_orion wrote:I believe SP is refering to how you
1. judged spyreX only in relation to the amished wagon as neutral
2. judged spyreX as neutral for doing both of the things your other two suspects had to some degree done.
However, that's just my impression on the matter.
Even if that is not what SP is referring to, care to explain?
PROTIP: He didn't.SaintKerrigan wrote:although he did start the Amished wagon.
Ok, you goofed and missed my vote.SaintKerrigan wrote:@ SP: Ok, I goofed and missed your vote. Why does this make me scum?
SaintKerrigan wrote:Forgot Spyrex was voting Amished too.My mind doesn't know what the hell to make of Spyrex, but he seems to have been fairly quiet,although he did start the Amished wagon.Going neutral for now.
Also, to everyone jumping on Amished for what he did, why aren't you giving RedCoyote the same treatment?
SaintKerrigan wrote:Leaving my vote on RC because he's gone suspiciously quiet as of late (plus my previous grievances still stand).
In other words:SocioPath wrote:And SK doesn't think Spy not starting the wagon is a big deal, despite that was listed in the reasons for SK's opinion on Spy.
Yes, call out the word 'town', not the reasoning behind such.SaintKerrigan wrote:Who said I thought Spy was town for "starting" the wagon?
I don't.SaintKerrigan wrote:Why do you keep changing the points against me every time I question them?
What I am SAYING is that upon finding out he did not start the wagon, you declined to see that significance.SaintKerrigan wrote:Where did I say Spyrex was town for "starting" the Amished wagon?
You never said that either.SocioPath wrote:'SO? WHATS YOUR POINT? WHERE ARE YOU GOING WITH THIS?'
If you list reasons for why a person is of a certain alignment, and then later find out that those reasons are not true, than naturally that should adjust your opinion on that person.SaintKerrigan wrote:@ SP: So why does me not recognizing the significance of that make me scum?
AWWW CRAPZZ U R RITE.UncertainKitten wrote:SP is being surprisingly coherent right now.