Mini 986: Beatles Mafia (Game Over)
-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
How so?^^^scummy
a) It's danaDan's defensiveness and pandering to the mod raises eyebrows.
b) defensiveness?
c) Sorry that I complimented the mod for giving me the kind of votecount I like, but hardly ever see. If I was the mod, I know I'd appreciate it when people recognized my hard work. Sheesh. I might start getting defensive if this wagon builds up any more.-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
Way to say something negative about me with no basis. It's the second page, I have revealed one person as acting scummily, and you are already accusing me of not scumhunting. Who made you king of MafiaScum? I missed the coronation.Except he's not scumhunting.
My case on inHimshallIbe is a better one than most people have, especially you.-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
@ The Skeward
I think you're right, and for that reason I like the MonkeyMan wagon as well, but I still prefer inHim, because he just voted AGAIN with no reasoning.
Right now I would lynch:
inHim
MonkeyMan
Karma (maybe)
In that order. And ekIM, just try putting yourself in my shoes. Most people on this forum would probably resort to foul language if they recieved three votes in two pages with little to no reasoning.-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
That may be a weak scumtell at best, but you haven't proven that I was nervous. I haven't switched my vote this entire game, and I haven't gone postal or anything, so I don't know where you get this. With every post of the same old case, you become more and more scummy in my book.Karma wrote:I resent being called a VI. Nervousness in the RVS is a scumtell.-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
Yeah, Monkey, Zang, and inHim do make a convincing scum team.Anon wrote:
At this point Im thinking one of Monkey or Karma is scum.TheSkeward wrote: @muh316, Anon, VasudeVa: I've provided reasons why I think that, although similar, a MonkeyMan lynch is better than a Karma lynch. Do you agree? Would you jump onto this wagon?
Also, if Monkey is scum, Zang is 100% scum with him.-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
I beg to differ. There's nothing remotely nervous about that post. I clearly made the point that more scumhunting than I had done at that point was impossible, and that Monkey saying that about me and expecting others to buy it was simply ridiculous. The most you could say about that post was that it showed frustration, which is obviously understandable.Karma wrote:
This = nervousness. And what's your case on me? Purely OMGUS?Danakillsu wrote:Way to say something negative about me with no basis. It's the second page, I have revealed one person as acting scummily, and you are already accusing me of not scumhunting. Who made you king of MafiaScum? I missed the coronation.
My case on inHimshallIbe is a better one than most people have, especially you.
And what case are you talking about? Notice how I didn't put you on the scum team I proposed and never fosed you or voted you. Who's nervous now? The player who argues somewhat vehemently that he is scumhunting or the player who believes others are trying to lynch him who aren't?-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
Okay, sure. I suspect you, but I don't have a formal case on you. I find your arguments against me very suspect. If that's OMGUSing to you, fine.Karma wrote:This is suspecting me, even if it is slightly. You have no reason for it other than OMGUSing.
This is a misrep. I did NOT say no one is trying to lynch you. I said that you believe I have made a case against you (which would mean I want you lynched) when I did no such thing. You essentially said I want to lynch you, and that is somewhat paranoid/nervous, at least more so than me. Your case appears to boil down to nervousness, which isn't much of a case, and can't be proven.Karma wrote:I have 4 votes. That means players are trying to lynch me - for what, I don't know. I made a case on dana and I stand by it.-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
A) What is your problem, man? LRN2RD, PLZ! I JUST SAID THAT WHAT THAT MEANT IS THAT YOU THINK THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO ARE TRYING TO LYNCH YOU, WHO IN FACT ARE NOT! That would be me, specifically. There ARE players who are trying to lynch you. But they are not me, and you have said that I was trying to lynch you, because you asked what my case was on you. If I had a case on you, I would be trying to lynch you.Karma wrote:@Dana: How am I misunderstanding this quote:
It's in reference to me, no? That makes it seem I think people are trying to lynch me when they aren't. But, people are trying to lynch me. So, what am I missing?Danakillsu wrote:the player who believes others are trying to lynch him who aren't?
Where did I say that? I said that you suspected me. Which you admitted that you did. Now you're just contradicting yourself.dana wrote:You essentially said I want to lynch you, and that is somewhat paranoid/nervous, at least more so than me.
It started as nervousness, which is a good starting point for a case, but now it includes contradictions and outright lies.dana wrote:Your case appears to boil down to nervousness, which isn't much of a case, and can't be proven.
@VasudeVa: I think you meant to vote dana. It's okay, just use preview next time.
B) If you had put the sentence before this quote in the quote, it would make sense. Why are you intentionally quoting me out of context? You asked what my case on you was, which implies that I'm am trying to make a case on you, which implies that I want you lynched. Just because I said maybe I would want to lynch you Day 3 doesn't mean that I have a case against you.
C) Where are your contradictions and lies now? Is there anything not discussed in this post? Because a maximum of one contradiction and no lies can be found in this post. And I've proven there's not even that.-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
I'll give you the short version. I've logically contradicted you for a while concerning your case on me (which means concerning why you want me lynched). You turn around and ask what my case is on you (which means why I want you lynched). I say I am suspicious of your continued baseless accusations, but that I don't want you lynched, and have never really said that I did. This means that you are more nervous than me, because you assume I want a rope around your neck when the most I have said is that I am suspicious of your attack against me and that I would consider lynching you D3 as things stand right now.-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
@Karma (of course)
This may seem stupid to you, but it would be best for you if you just drop your craplogic case against me and move on. I'm pretty sure that you are the only one who thinks I'm scummy at this point, because it's been a while since MonkeyMan posted. Anyway a town vs. town isn't going to help anything, and I think it would be better if we could just move on to scumhunting.
After iso'ing MonkeyMan I can sort of understand the case against him, but it's not exceedingly strong. He hasn't done much besides RVS and attacking me for "not scumhunting" "nervousness" and "pandering to the mod", none of which at this point are good scumtells. It's kind of like Karma, except not as strong.
inHim, however, is very different. He has RVS voted me, confirmed his vote with no explanation, while encouraging others to vote for me, and then declared me town and voted for someone else, both with no reasoning. That's just horrible. More votes for inHim, please.-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
But, Skeward, how do you know this? He hasn't said anything like this, so for all I know, it's all been random. He seems to just go with whatever the opinion seems to be at the time and not bother telling anyone why, and I can't stand this. MonkeyMan hasn't given me any reason to believe he's scum creating a case any more than Karma has done. Therefore, my vote stays with inHim, the player that's not even trying to help town.Skeward wrote:As for inHim, I think you're barking up the wrong tree. My take on it: he RVS voted you, confirmed it when you reacted oddly to pressure, decided you were town based on the exchange between you, MonkeyMan, and Karma, and then moved on to another suspect. Your only issue seems to be that he's not providing reasoning, which is not the superduperscumtell you seem to believe it is - a lot of players just don't tend to provide reasoning for their votes.-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
Unless you're an alt, this is ridiculous. I'm not a newbie, especially not compared to you. Want to check my completed games?TheSkeward wrote:I think inHim is a town-on-town wagon. SB could be scum, but I have newbtown reads from dana and to a lesser extent muh316.
What? I've had the most non-defense content of anyone so far! Besides, I called my main attacker town, so I'm really not THAT defensive. And your statement of my case is an oversimplification. It's no wonder you don't quote me here.SD wrote:dana: defensicveness: Of course - all your posts basically only contain justification for your previous behaviour... But RVS is hardly over, so likely slow town. Also: How is a random vote followd by a cross OMGUS a "case"?! Slightly scummy so far.
How have I taken things personally, exactly? I haven't said anyone insulted me, personally. I stated that MonkeyMan baselessly said I wasn't scumhunting, but I never thought of it as a personal attack. And once again, unless you're an alt, I don't know where you get off saying I'm going down the road to VI.SD wrote:dana: Please try to not take things personally. That's always bad in mafia and the most common first step on the way down to VI.
No, don't worry, it pretty much is a "hollow bubble". But it does show that I'm not a VI and don't need to resort to personal attacks, OMGUS, or AtE's.SD wrote:Dana&karma: I definitely need to read this confrontation in ISO, just to make sure It's not just the hollow bubble it seems to be so far.
If there are those still wondering about my involvement in this game for whatever reason, the main cause for my lack of long-winded "attacks" as opposed to "defenses" is that the player I find scummiest isn't giving me any more material to discuss. And neither is MonkeyMan. So what am I supposed to really do other than answer people's questions?-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
Oh, I know it's not the foul language, because I haven't resorted to any. That was kind of my point.ekiM wrote:It's not just the foul language, it's the whole... tone? It reads hyper-sensitive which rubs the wrong way, but I don't think it's actually scummy.
How many times do I have to say that it's not just the playstyle, it's the pattern of votes. He votes for me, calls for more votes for me, jumps off my wagon, and votes for my secondary adversary. That's a scummy flip-flop.ekiM wrote:I don't think inHim not explaining his votes is a scumtell but he needs to get more involved in the game. Remember there's a difference between a playstyle one disapproves of, and scuminess.-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
Shadow Dancer wrote:OK, dana, that you now do the same - well, I'll call it misinterpretaion for now - on me is something I absolutely do not like! Where do I say I want to lynchany one?!
How about right here? SB is the only one you WOULDN'T lynch. And way to prove that you're scummy by completely ignoring the other things I said in response to you.Shadow Dancer wrote: SB: Only player who's posts I really like so far. Not because of actual scum hunting but because he's got his logic straight... He's the only one so far I wouldn't frivoulously D1 lynch...-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
Everyone disappears, whether under pressure or not.Karma wrote:I disagree but this is a post for MD, not here.
Let's talk real scum. MonkeyMan disappears under pressure...hm.
@mod
I don't know who if any deserves one, but please send out appropriate prods. It seems half our players have gone missing.-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
What you must mean is more helpful than you, because it just reflected the opinions of the town.inHimshallibe wrote:
I dunno, the fact he posted suspicions was a helpful step.Karma wrote:UNVOTE: Monkey
VOTE: muh316
This is the better option here. Continually promising posts, and then delivering us that last post? No scumhunting, just four names of people whose behavior is scummy. Nice try. Monkey deserves a vig shot though, for scumminess and general uselessness.
Wagon go!
@all: Sorry, got a new job and adjusting to the schedule of having to wake up early. You should see more evening CST posts from me in the future.
@ Karma
I really don't think muh is the lynch for today. Even though he has continued to promise content and hasn't given us any, there are two players (inHim and MonkeyMan) who have actively posted scummy material.
I would suggest that everyone vote for one of those. If you're voting for Karma, please switch to MonkeyMan. Anyone else should decide between the two. This would be the most helpful strategy for town, since if Karma is scum, MonkeyMan is scum with him.-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
It's a shame you can't help me.InHim wrote:It's a shame you can't get over a read.
Also, there's very little chance both Karma and MonkeyMan are scumbuddies.
On the Karma/MonkeyMan issue, they pretty much teamed up to try to take me down with horrible reasoning. Even if they're NOT scum together, if you think Karma is scummy, you should think MonkeyMan is even scummier for the same reasons. So you shouldn't be trying to lynch Karma.
Let me counter these questions with my own question that really gets at the heart of the matter. What would everyone have thought if I said "Hey, Karma, you're stupid. I'm not going to defend myself against you and I'll just allow you to think I'm scum."SB wrote:So if you see no useful content in that whole argument yourself and also claim to have no secondary (p.e. personal) reasons to keep that debate up, then, according to you, you have only knowingly and willingly created a huge bubble of empty posts to appear to town in one way or another. That is kinda scummy, don't you think? I'll keep it in mind until later, I'll have a look at the muh and monkey cases first.-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
What an amazing response. You wouldn't happen to have any REASONS to say that, would you?inHimshallibe wrote:Oh, I always meant to respond to this, and never did.
This is patently wrong.danakillsu wrote:
He obviously voted for me simply because I was voting for him, and didn't even bother giving a fake reason for it. Just because it's "RVS" doesn't mean OMGUS is impossible.It was an RV, no? Why do you consider it OMGUS?-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
I think that was probably a vig. I'm really confused, though, because neither of my main scumreads was scum. I think the lurkers in this game must be our scum, because they were content to let us lynch SB or inHim.VasudeVa wrote:inHim is a weird kill. .
---
I think there is 1-2 scum in SB wagon and 1 scum in inHim. I don't think SD is scum.
Vote: Zang, for now. (I did suspect him sometime in the middle of D1.)vote: muh316-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
@muh316
I didn't want you lynched yet, I wanted a claim. I didn't think town should get this much pressure on someone only to turn it off without a claim. I half-agree with those saying the muh case isn't a great one. But I want to see if it has validity by judging your claim. If you delay much longer, I'll begin to think that what we eventually get is your own fakeclaim.-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
@The Skeward
Well, one of four things can happen.
1. Everyone just leaves the muh wagon and jumps on Zang or someone else.
2. muh finally claims and we jump on Zang because we are satisfied with muh's claim.
3. muh finally claims and we lynch him for having a claim that doesn't fit.
4. muh refuses to claim, and we lynch him.
After one of these four things happens, I will say why I find Zang very suspicious. I also find muh very suspicious for not simply claiming and letting the town decide whether his claim is believable.-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
Stranger things have happened. You're still at L-2, though. And I'm not switching my vote until I get a claim or a good reason to keep you from claiming.muh316 wrote:
I was never in danger. Yes I was at L-1 but I knew that nobody was going to lynch me because it was too early.danakillsu wrote:@muh
But you should have claimed when you WERE in danger. The fact that you didn't makes me think that you are scum who didn't have a good fakeclaim atm.-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
Okay, fine. I will consider the muh wagon abandoned since the other people on it are Karma (missing) and Zang (my top scumread).
unvote vote:Zang
Anon pretty much sums it up. Zang constantly saying "Starbuck is town" without any good reason at all shows that he knew from outside information that she was town. And since it was D1, he couldn't be a cop and figure that out.-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
@SD
And I said that...when exactly?
@Zang
I count two posts where you specifically call Starbuck town (one was D2). I count 6 posts (out of 35) where you say something negative about the Starbuck wagon. This is all because you "have no reason to think Starbuck is scum", "don't want to lynch a replacement for things their predecessor did", and "think inHim is scummier". Or something along those lines. The third is decently valid, but the first two are really lame. The others had given you many reasons to believe Starbuck was scum, especially because of MonkeyMan's actions. And not lynching someone just because they are a replacement is horrible policy, because any scum could just get replaced when they were about to get lynched, and prevent their slot's lynch. Die, scum.-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
-
-
danakillsu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: December 7, 2009
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.