Me in a No-Rules game. That is priceless.
14 pages into the game and the best you can do is policy vote someone whom just replaced in? Even I am not that bad...
I have read enough to make a few posts. Beside, asking questions as you read helps you understand and catch up faster. At least I knew who Bananas was before you did.animorpherv1 wrote:DeathNote appears to not be reading the thread, (and the rules??). Because he'd know all of that stuff if he just read the thread.
Also, bananas (if he hasn't) should claim and stump, so we have guaranteed 1 less scum.
That is my point. If UK is scum and is a tree stump, then using the sham account would get him lynched and force us to NL. There is plenty scum motivation, especially for a person who is tree stumped.Hoopla wrote:I fail to see how this would be a bad result though, as there would be zero town motivation to do that as a treestump. If we lynched Hate_Me_Not, I'd be 90%+ sold that Fishy was town out of the two of them.DeathNote wrote:May I please point out that by lynching this Sham account, you could be lynching UK whom is a tree stump. If she is maf, that would make sense for the sham account not to claim and allow himself/herself to be lynched.
zoraster wrote:Nope.DeathNote wrote:I was maf?
I understand the need to get reads on me. I am naturally one of the hardest people to get reads on for some reason, but please note that I have only been in this game for a few days, I am sure you can get something on me soon enough.zoraster wrote:You might consider the nature of this game as to whether you are actually dead or not and whether that was a real death scene.DeathNote wrote:But, I am dead? This is going to be fun to watch...
zoraster wrote:sure. you can post either way.DeathNote wrote:Ok well... tell me if I am wrong for doing this, but I am going to create a sham account and post in it. Will this be acceptable? I am assuming it is allowed since I am not in the dead area.
Sham account name is: Hate_Me_Not
Bull, I was about to be lynchedtotallynotmafia wrote:Why didn't you admit it was you yesterday? It seems to me you only admitted it today because you were about to be lynched.DeathNote wrote:Your an idiot (addressing anyone who is calling me out as scum for claiming my sham).
I can understand if I was caught hiding my sham account, but I confessed it. obviously people thought it was anti town to point out I was still alive which might be the case assuming that it was anyone beside me that pulled that stunt. I was curious as to were this was leading so I used a Sham, big deal.
I derailed town from lynching me. It is not my fault we lynch a different town person. Either way, we might have lynch him today.
Hmm thats interesting. I could have sworn you just accused me and Hoopla of being on one team, not opposite teams.totallynotmafia wrote:I think there's a possibility Espeonage may have slipped up with his "there is more than one faction" post, and if there are two scum teams I think they could be:
Scumgroup A:
-Hoopla
-Espeonage
Scumgroup B:
-DeathNote
-UK
Which explains certain players actions and why Espeonage would know if there is more than one scumgroup.
totallynotmafia wrote:Clearly Hoopla's original claim is different, and so she tried to make it look as if she was just quoting her original claim and hoped that we wouldn't bother to go back and check if it was the same.
This seems too good to be true but it looks as if we've just caught two scum in Hoopla and DeathNote
Oh my bad. This is the one that you accuse us of being on the same team, the other was just that we were both scum as if i had slipped or something.totallynotmafia wrote:DeathNote is scummy for the whole HMN and lying to the town thing. I forgot he was the one you fake-targeted, I don't really know the motivation behind doing that to fellow scum besides possible distancing but at any right I'd like to hear DeathNote's reasoning for misleading the town and not just owning up to the sham yesterday.
The point is, that me making the Hate_Me_Not shame shouldn't have been considered scummy. I had no idea how to take the NK, so I posted with a sham to see where it would go.xvart wrote:This doesn't really fly in my book because the pro-town thing would have been to post in your DN account yesterday. Just because you did something pro-town today to cover up a scum thing yesterday does not eliminate the fact that it was scummy yesterday. And, the alleged pm's between the mod and you don't rule out some third party anti-town role.DeathNote wrote:If I am now considered scum based off Hate_Me_Not, then perhaps I shouldn't have claimed it after all. I figured that was pro town thing to do at this point.
xvart.