(I'm back!)
Iecerint wrote:Yep, 've got it. Fine with my vote, too.
Hi, SB. Glad you're sticking around. You're the only one I know apart from Plum, I think.
Hai!
Iecerint wrote:Yep, 've got it. Fine with my vote, too.
Hi, SB. Glad you're sticking around. You're the only one I know apart from Plum, I think.
If that is all, then I can hardly say that's scummy. The only thing I would acknowledge is the dice vote.Iecerint wrote:That's the second time someone's asked for it, so I'll do it. Points against SD:
1. He dicevoted. Scum would be more likely to dicevote to make their RVS harder to interpret. But this fits his meta. Anti-town/null here IMO.
2. He voted you in his subsequent post. Jack thinks that was scummy because your vote for me was just RVS. I think it was fine because Jack had just asked SD to make a diceless vote. I think this is a weak tell at best.
3. His tone when he voted you was off. Scum are more likely to have "off" tone. But it's probably because English is his second language. Null.
That is it AFAIK.
You're getting it all wrong. My Internet access hasn't been the best, and thus my activity has flaked (and, btw, I usually keep a low profile). As I didn't have time to reread everything, I asked for the points against SD. And seeing those are only the points, I'm glad I didn't waste my time rereading.
As I always said, if you want my meta then go ahead and look for it. But this, this is omgus to no extend. More scummy points for you, sir!VasudeVa wrote:Terrible reasoning. Hypocrisy is a strong scumtell. What you just did pinged my scumdar off the roof. If you are scum, this is a bad move and I will get you lynched for it.Snow_Bunny wrote:You're getting it all wrong. My Internet access hasn't been the best, and thus my activity has flaked (and, btw, I usually keep a low profile). As I didn't have time to reread everything, I asked for the points against SD. And seeing those are only the points, I'm glad I didn't waste my time rereading.
I'm getting a slight gut feeling about VV. And, on top of that, I'm reading him scummy. For once, he attacked SD, but when Iec posted the lame case against him he didn't say a word about it. Then, what's the pressure on SD then? Fake scumhunting? Second, his suggestion about the voting thing seems like a weak rolefishing. Third, his benchsitting. I admit I haven't been the most active player, but that isn't an excuse to bring that point up. One thing is not participating, and another is just sitting away as an "impartial observer". Seems more like he's trying to just pass under everyone's radar while still posting something here and there.
Oh, and I don't buy the so-used excuse of "I did that to start discussion".
So, in conclusion, VV is top scummy right now.
Unvote, vote: VV
Requesting your metas. Failure to comply will result in an OMGUS vote.
No offense, but your record as scum with that .5 W/L ratio as scum and makes me think that you just did a yet another bad move as scum(hence the meta request). I would have expected a post like that from the other players who have been building a case against me, but for it to come from you is quite unexpected and scummy. There hasn't been enough discussion between us for you to have that conviction against me, and you lacked any sort of doubt that, to me, is a town tell.
Also, you just used all the cases against me with weak conviction and lack of explanation. Not to mention the barren wasteland that is your ISO. Now that's active lurking.
You have it right.Iecerint wrote:Oh, OK. I think I see what you meant.
What I thought you meant:
VV: OMG SD IS SCUM-E
Iec: INORITE. BLAHBLAHBLAH HYPOTHETICAL CRAP CASE AGAINST SD.
VV: *hands off once the wagons rolls*
What you really meant:
VV: SD IS SCUM-E.
*time passes*
SB: WTF WHY IS SD SCUM
Iec: THIS IS IT AFAIK.
SB: LOL CRAP CASE.
VV: *smiles nervously*
Do I have that right?
First, I'm a girl, thanks. Second, I'm going for the most suspect player??? Did you read well? I'm pretty sure I prefer VV over everyone else top suspect (which I believe it's SV, check the votecount). Wow, this is unbelievable!Shadow Dancer wrote:So... finally...
/unvote
My opinion about SB: Undecided
He is going on the most suspect player. Nothing to say anout that as long as we do not know what VV really is.
Because I'm not always a follower. When I have a prey (read: scum), I won't let it go until its lynched. That's the way I play.Flava Flave wrote:This seems different than anything in the links Vas provided. You seem more like you are attempting to lead the town rather than follow like you did in those games. I'd like to know why.Snow_Bunny wrote:Meh, I'm telling all of you, VV is scum.
Stop doing whatever you're doing and vote for him. Gogogo
Supporting a lynch is not the same as having stances on players. That's why I'm asking you for stances. Out of that list, who's scummier? Why? That's why I'm calling bench-sitting. "Yes, yes, I agree with this and that as well, but I won't take a stance". That's not good, and it's a common scumtell.Andrius wrote:Regarding this:and this:Snow_Bunny wrote: @Andrius: I don't like how you, after reading the game twice and bringing up some good points, aren't taking a stance. Seems like bench-sitting.I give you:Johoohno wrote: @ Andrius: As far as I remember your predecessor had his vote on SD (but recently reading the game twice should make you a bit more aware of that than I?). I too, as Snow_Bunny, want you to take a stance and decide where you want your vote and why.Andrius wrote: Iecerint, VasudeVa, and Shadow Dancer are lynches I could support, but I'd like to hear from them in regards to what I've said. I'd also like to wait awhile before casting my own vote, since I want to be able to talk to you all and see how it goes down.Snow_Bunny and Johoohno:I said here that I wasn't going to immediately vote, and see what I could get out of my top three suspects. I don't know if you missed it in the big text, or you just want to put some pressure on me, but I'll vote once I've heard from SD (assuming she comes back soon-ish), since Vas left at the perfect time, to save his own hide. And yes, Joh, I've inherited a vote on SD.
I believe I made that clear in my last post. If VV is town, then I'd still be labeling ooba townie. After all, he brought up a good point against him, and saying that just because VV flipped town my opinion of him will change is hypocrite. After all, I'm voting for VV as well since long ago.LordChronos wrote: @Snow
Would you still label ooba townie if VV is in fact town? Can you confirm that your Power: section does not contain flavor?
-_-ULordChronos wrote:Can you answer the second part of that?
Snow_Bunny wrote:LordChronos wrote: @Snow
Would you still label ooba townie if VV is in fact town? Can you confirm that your Power: section does not contain flavor?I believe I made that clear in my last post.If VV is town, then I'd still be labeling ooba townie. After all, he brought up a good point against him, and saying that just because VV flipped town my opinion of him will change is hypocrite. After all, I'm voting for VV as well since long ago.
Snow_Bunny wrote:Wow, so many things happened during weekend. So, let me express my PoV regarding those matters. VV is scum. Period. Fakeclaim is fake (ooba brings a good point, thatI'm yet to see countered). Almaster, I'm not sure. It fits the flavour, at least. I don't agree with the self-vigging, though.
Nice rolefishing. Keep up like that, scum.Andrius wrote:Iecerint: How does my asking you to clarify your statement make me scummy?
ooba: I think you are missing my point. I'm saying that, if you die hammering VV, are you aware that the town will then lose your power? So, are you worth more to the town dead (and your name cleared) and powerless than alive? Like, if you were a Cop/Doc, you dying would not help the town at all. See what I'm saying?