Grrr.. I couldn't vocalize how frustrated I am if I tried. I spent 3-4 hours typing up a pretty detailed summary of my reads and notes in Notepad, then had some sort of power 'hiccup' that my shitty battery backup ignored and *poof*. Nothing.
&%^##&^ and stuff.. Here's my re-written post with all the excess fat chopped off.
--
The main point I was going to make was that the deadlynch is
probably
the biggest piece of information we have. Especially since it is coupled with the next day death of a GF who was one of the potential lynches. I think it's really important to look at who voted for who, and why. And also why their vote didn't change.
So let's bring back to the deadline lynch vote:
LlamaFluff (Colors added by me for no extra charge) wrote:Deadline Vote Count
MonkeyMan576
(4) - semioldguy,
Neopi
, Gorrad, StrangerCoug
Starbuck (3) - Jazzmyn, YankCane151,
MonkeyMan576
Neopi
(3) -
chamber
, Starbuck, Crazy
Not Voting (1) - Brandi
Now, let's go down the line.
StrangerCoug
- Ends up looking scummiest due to the fact that he added the hammering vote. He already answered somewhat for it, but being that all three choices had made a role claim and there's this quote from earlier in the game..
StrangerCoug 327 wrote:Unvote: MonkeyMan576
Vote: chamber
See post #242 for my reasoning. I'm not lynching a claimed PR on Day 1.
In your "hammering" post you put your choices down to between Neopi and MonkeyMan576 and I know that you were pretty consistently suspicious of both of them... But you had also voted for Starbuck for a period of time after the Crazy "fakeclaim" slip so she wasn't exactly on your list of townies either. Why the backtrack on your Day 1 PR lynching policy?
Gorrad
- You voted for MonkeyMan576 for withholding his flavor (per Post 694). Since that post you attacked Starbuck for unvoting MonkeyMan576 and attacked one of the main reasons for pursuing a Neopi lynch (
"LAL is the worst policy lynch ever."). But after Neopi's claim, you stated thought Neopi's claim was overpowered and that he was probably scum, but didn't change your vote.
... I guess I don't really have a question for you. I kinda find you straight up scummy.
semioldguy
- Was consistently against MonkeyMan576 all day. Maintained solid pressure, didn't misrep or ask leading questions. I have no problem with his behavior. However, he was pretty tunneled on MonkeyMan576 (and chamber, I suppose) which means he had near ZERO interaction with Neopi beyond asking him for a little more flavor detail behind his claim.
semioldguy (839) wrote:Because I have a town read on her, whereas I have a scummy read on MonkeyMan576 and neutral leaning scummy read on Neopi (and slight scum read on fuzzylightning prior to Neopi).
{assuming that "slight scum" is greater than "neutral leaning scum"} How come you had more of a scum read on fuzzylighting than Neopi? What on Earth did Neopi do to reduce your suspicion of that player slot?
Jazzmyn
- According to your vote, it was Starbuck's attempted self-hammer which earned your vote on her. Which you carried out until the end of the game. I'd try to analyze more, but you gave a very detailed explanation (post 887) about exactly what your reasons were for keeping your vote where it was.
Do you still think that Starbuck is the scummiest player in the game? If so, why aren't you currently voting for her?
YankCane151
- You switched your vote from Neopi to Starbuck after Kmd4390 was day-killed. But then you didn't really justify why you were leaving it there at deadline. Plus you went from this:
YankCane151 (568) wrote:Vote:Starbuck
Her lynch will help us find out more info.
to this:
YankCane151 (868) wrote:Monkey, You say Starbuck's lynch would gives us the most info regardless what she turns up, but what about your role? Are you lynching(and convincing others) to lynch Starbuck because you think she's scum, or because you think you'll "find out the most"?
Could you summarize what happened between those two quotes? Why does it seem like your chastising MonkeyMan576 for pushing an information lynch when you were voting for Starbuck for the exact same reason?
Starbuck
- You have been quite the post-leader of this game, and I had a much longer paragraph initially. You goaded MonkeyMan576 for the majority of the day. Sometimes for good reason, sometimes not. You originally voted for Neopi for lurking then kept it on until deadline. However when one reads your posts in iso bewteen the Neopi vote and the end of the day, you're doing nothing but attacking and baiting MonkeyMan576. If you thought MonkeyMan576 wasn't the right person to lynch, why were you pressuring him so much?
Also,
Starbuck (894) wrote:I really don't understand why there were still people on Monkey's train at the end of yesterday. I know I threw out the theory of him possibly being the Tramp, but his flavor definitely mirrored his role, no matter how scummy I found him to be acting.
Why does this Day 2 behavior not jive with this late Day 1 post?
Starbuck (841) wrote:I'm either for Monkey or Neopi. I definitely think there's a lot that Neopi isn't telling us.
Starbuck (1047) wrote:Kublai, there's probably not a lot in there that you can answer since you aren't Brandi, but please try your best to do so?
Uh, as far as I can see, your case on Brandi is based on inconsistencies in her opinions. I can't answer for any of that.
Crazy
- You voted Neopi because "it was the best alternative you could see". You were consistent in your questioning of him to get more info. Plus you plainly stated your view of the top three potential lynches before the deadline. So pretty pro-townie play altogether. I got no questions for you.
--
Vote: Gorrad