Mini 852- Crayola Catastrophe Game Over (Post 1158)

[Josh Lyman]

I'm just trying to avoid heat. You know, because I would MELT. Melting is bad.

Semi-random

vote: Kirbyoshi

for not voting. And not posting.

I can't stand lurkers.

[Josh Lyman]

I'm just trying to avoid heat. You know, because I would MELT. Melting is bad.

I dislike it when people look like they are attempting to breadcrumb in an obvious way. It looks as if that's what you are doing, blatantly breadcrumbing something. Players shouldn't need to breadcrumb, if they ever should claim, then they way they play their role should dictate whether the claim is believable, not some looney post at the beginning of the game.

I.... wow.

Somebody's grumpy!

[Josh Lyman]

Meant title. what I get for not double checking posts.

sig = signature

Still doesn't explain why you don't explain your votes, just that you don't.

That is correct. If I do so regardless of alignment though it should be an irrelevent point. I just don't feel like explaining myself right now, maybe another day.

This is a game of, first and foremost, communication. If you don't "feel like" explaining yourself, perhaps you shouldn't "feel like" playing.

unvote
vote: chamber

[Josh Lyman]

Unvote

That's rather irritating.

[Josh Lyman]

What's the point to all the self reminders and the "elaborate later" type comments? I don't like that at all. If you have something to say either say it now or keep it to yourself until it's relevant, hinting at it does the town no good and is only a distraction.

Please elaborate now. You took the time to make the post take the time to validate your claim.... Statements without reason do nothing for the town.

I agree completely.

I agree. Posting "reminders" to yourself in a public thread seems ..... I don't know, less than Town. Surely you have the means to keep notes to yourself on your own computer, or perhaps a piece of paper, or maybe scrawling in crayons on the wall.... It just seems to be shitting up the thread for no apparent reason.

[Josh Lyman]

Post 31 – Scummy from

Josh

due to calling a player out on lurking on the same day (At least, in my time) that the game started.

You missed the part where I said "semi-random" -- right?

I acknowledge I should probably quote the post I'm responding to.

Post 96 –

Josh

, what’s rather irritating?

The content of the post just two posts back from my post, thus:

I just asked to be replaced out because the people in this game don't seem to enjoy the way I play. I hope you don't hold it against whoever replaces me, as it is something I do as all alignments.

I just found it irritating that he got criticism for his "style" of play (or, rather, lack thereof) so he decided to take his marbles and go home. I expect that from a three-year-old, not a Mafia player.

[Josh Lyman]

Sorry for not posting #170 in my color. I forgot.

[Josh Lyman]

Post 31 – Scummy from

Josh

due to calling a player out on lurking on the same day (At least, in my time) that the game started.

You missed the part where I said "semi-random" -- right?

No. It's why I pointed it out.

Got it. No random voting stage with

ZazieR

.

Anything else I need to know to keep from offending you?

[Josh Lyman]

@Josh Lyman- Haven't gotten much from him, except a breadcrumb. Not sure what to think.

It wasn't a breadcrumb.

As you can see, I don't have very many reads, but I'm doing this because I think it's important to contribute.

This triggers my scumdar. "It's important to contribute" is usually something scum says when they feel the pressure of not lurking and yet can't convincingly come up with anything concrete.

You are about the only person* pinging me right now. So,

Vote: Pomegranate

*Except

ZazieR

, but I need to stay far, far away from the crazy right now.

[Josh Lyman]

I just want to be clear that I did that post correctly. My color is Dark Red, and

Pomegranate

's is Brown. They look very close, but not exactly the same. (I wanted to mention this before someone accused me of not posting in the right color.)

[Josh Lyman]

Post 31 – Scummy from

Josh

due to calling a player out on lurking on the same day (At least, in my time) that the game started.

You missed the part where I said "semi-random" -- right?

No. It's why I pointed it out.

Got it. No random voting stage with

ZazieR

.

Anything else I need to know to keep from offending you?

RVS is fun.
My problem is the 'semi' bit.

The 'semi' bit means that he was the easiest to 'randomly' target based on lack of posting. I get that not everyone can post as much as us wordy types, but it was just something I picked up on. It's since been rectified, so you can untwist your panties.

@Josh - I'm not crazy

I never said you were.

[Josh Lyman]

@Josh

What I don't like about your semi-random vote is:
-It was based upon lurking, while the game had started that day.
-You were the 11th player to post. Only Kirby (The one you voted based upon 'lurking') came after you.

Okay, fine. Yes, it was based on lurking,

on the first day.

What is it about 'jokevote' that you don't get? And, yes, everybody else had posted; that's why I singled out Kirby

for not posting.

Can you say "overanalyzing?" I knew you could.

*Except ZazieR, but I need to stay far, far away from the crazy right now.

Then what are you calling me here?

Sorry, I forgot I had written that. I was frustrated at the time with all your 'reminders.'

[Josh Lyman]

Hey, Nachomamma, that's one.

This is two.

Three more to go.

Care to make a more realistic case against me?

[Josh Lyman]

Demanding content would be better than posts. Josh can spent the most of his posts defending himself. IMO, that whole fuss over the random vote is a bit much.

I agree, on both points. I promise content tomorrow.

[Josh Lyman]

@Josh

What I don't like about your semi-random vote is:
-It was based upon lurking, while the game had started that day.
-You were the 11th player to post. Only Kirby (The one you voted based upon 'lurking') came after you.

Okay, fine. Yes, it was based on lurking,

on the first day.

What is it about 'jokevote' that you don't get? And, yes, everybody else had posted; that's why I singled out Kirby

for not posting.

Can you say "overanalyzing?" I knew you could.

Once again, it's based upon the 'semi-' bit.

Well, whatever. I obviously can't stop you from perseverating over this, but I

can

stop responding to it. Therefore, this is my last post concerning my 'semi-random' vote.

[Josh Lyman]

@Josh Lyman- Haven't gotten much from him, except a breadcrumb. Not sure what to think.

It wasn't a breadcrumb.

As you can see, I don't have very many reads, but I'm doing this because I think it's important to contribute.

This triggers my scumdar. "It's important to contribute" is usually something scum says when they feel the pressure of not lurking and yet can't convincingly come up with anything concrete.

You are about the only person* pinging me right now. So,

Vote: Pomegranate

*Except

ZazieR

, but I need to stay far, far away from the crazy right now.

So, revisiting this.

Pomegranate

is still pinging me, for lack of specific, non-"gut" reads on anyone in particular. My vote stays, for the moment.

As far as

ZazieR,

as irritating as he can be, I'm not seeing much in the way of scuminess.

[Josh Lyman]

This is a bad wagon right now.

We need to run up a counter wagon to get some responses

.

Unvote; Vote: Pomegranate

Elaborate on the bolded

No.

It is not always pro-town to come forward with reasoning first. I'll elaborate after it happens. If you disagree with something that doesn't come with a reason, you should post your reason for why you think it would be bad to do that.

HoS: ZazieR

How would it not be pro-town to give reasons for why you think something? This game is built on reasoning, and if you're not willing to state it, it makes you look pretty scummy.

The difference between semioldguy and chamber is that SoG said "... come forward with reasoning

first."

chamber, on the other hand, wasn't going to explain. Ever.

I see the difference. Don't you?