Mini 810: Infection! Mini - Game over!
-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
I somewhat agree about the claim thing, its problematic for the PRs to claim when a counter-claim makes it a 50/50 lynch and then the liar kills himself that night and we lose out. Still, a 50/50 chance is better than just going down isn't it? If scum counter-claim they're risking a player which is (presumably?) half of their team. This is my first mini and we don't know how many scum or anything else there are out there. It doesn't make much sense to counter-claim either way because their very well could be two of the same power role out there. I like the idea of making a blanket decision one way or the other though."By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
Well if he's genuine he'd probably inject himself that night if he hasn't already and he could tell town that if he'd claimed anyways, so he wouldn't become infected that first night in a good world. Buys an extra night of vaccine, after that I could see the mercy kill on him. I can't imagine more than one vigilante (this is the term yes?) in a twelve person game, three deaths a night seems excessive, but I could be wrong.
Also I had a question for the mod, maybe he didn't tell us this on purpose, but I wasn't sure. If a Guard targets an Infected that is suiciding to infect another player which ability takes priority? Does the Guard kill him and he doesn't get to infect his target or does he die and infect still? Or do we not get to know this?"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
Thank you! =)Xylthixlm wrote:I'm glad you asked that. Guard kill takes priority over infection. The infected would be dead and the infection attempt would fail."By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
I agree Charter, I'm saying while it may not be a bad idea to claim, it IS a bad idea to counter-claim as town since we don't know how many of each role is out there. You make a good point Mokina, but that's a case by case choice at any rate. I think I'm leaning with Charter here, seems like claims in this game could make it very messy."By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
The problem with fake-claims is lying to your fellow town as a pro-town role isn't usually a good idea. Tricking your fellow town is as likely as tricking the scum. If you fake-claim scientist as bullet-proof that'll most likely waste vaccinates if there are other scientists and get a character that otherwise might've been NK proof shot by the guard. Fake-claiming bullet-proof as Scientist might work, but then again you might just get lynched if people don't think bullet-proof is justification for the votes on you (assuming you're claiming to avoid lynch). Protective PRs tend to avoid suspicion whereas a bullet-proof would have no problem being the best pro-town he could be to avoid guard kills or lynches. Guess my noobie logic will have to do for this post BM."By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
Lynch all lurkers!! Just kidding. =P It is odd that your alignment can switch mid-game, all your awesome towning can become a hindrance if you get infected. I'd still like to see everyone post.PaperPenguin wrote:
Trying as hard as possible not to get lynched. This game is strange in that people want to be NKed.Shotty to the Body wrote:I agree, where is the rest of the town? =P"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
Any particular reason why? I'm more suspicious of all the people not posting anything that are flying under the radar.charter wrote:Shotty and Kid are my current top two suspects.
I'm still in favor of no counterclaims."By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
I don't consider myself super newbie, I just haven't done any games outside the newbie queue before this one so I don't have a standard of comparison for the ratio of pro-town:scum players for mini themed or mini in general. I was assuming two for that example since that's what I'm used to from the newbie queue, but I realize that the numbers are actually up in the air.populartajo wrote: Shotty 31.
shooty, how newbie would you consider yourself? why did you assume that scum would risk half of their team when counterclaiming?shotty wrote:If scum counter-claim they're risking a player which is (presumably?) half of their team. This is my first mini and we don't know how many scum or anything else there are out there.
Shotty and Mokina why are you assuming two scum distribution?"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
No lynch is not in our interest, if we don't scum hunt and actually lynch someone it will be near impossible for the Guard to determine who the scum are. Especially as we move into later days and the player that is scum changes it would be a shot in the dark if we just vote no lynch rather than being productive during the day. I would also agree with Mokina that even suggesting no lynch is slightly suspicious."By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
I'd be interested to see them then, why are you holding back on us?charter wrote:Not that I don't have reasons, and I do plan on giving them, but why did people make a fuss when I said I was suspicious of Shotty and Kid but didn't give reasons, but when BM votes without giving a reason, no one questioned him?
I don't see how NL is remotely a good idea. Won't be supporting it."By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
Err one more question for the mod before I take off for the night, when someone dies who is infected (as in was infected at night instead of starting that way) will we be told what their role before infection was? Normally it's like XXX, Insert Role, died at night or whatever, will we just see XXX, Infected or will we get something like XXX, Infected <insert other role here>?
You will not learn the original role of Infected players."By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
Not lynching scummy players in this game is a mistake. If we let someone who acts scummy slide they'll just kill themselves that night and we lose our chance at taking down a scum. This isn't a normal game where we could hold them in our pocket till we are ready to lynch them. The odds of shooting an infected player are exactly 1 in 6 if there are two scum and 1 in 4 if there are three scum. Those don't exactly seem like good odds to me. We need to have day time action to give the PRs something to work with instead of a shot in the dark after a NL.
FOS: Veerus"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
Another vote without explanation? I love it, moar accusations without reasons so I can't defend myself thanks! I'm also tired of waiting for Charter to post his reasons for listing me and KKN as top suspects. If you want to vote me, can you tell me why so I can defend myself? This crap where someone votes or suspects without posting reasons is annoying and scummy. Scum do that sort of thing to make the town look harder at someone and when a genuine townie posts real reasons for a vote (mistaken or not) then the scum will be like "Of course that's why I was voting!!" All I've done this game is discuss and share my opinions with town and answer anything directed at me, so please tell me why BM you find me a votable target after a reread?"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
I respond emotively when I feel like I'm getting a screw-job, if you don't like it that's a personal problem. I have no problem answering a reasoned argument, but you have presented none. How in god's name can you overemphasize reasons? Reasons are what we base our votes and lynches on, when you put no reasons with your vote it has the same impact as "I'm not scum," defenses. If you can't present legitimate reasons now, why are you voting? Voting me now subconsciously causes people to look out for and overreact to things they would have previously passed off causing them to make a hasty judgement which you sit in a position to jump on. I'm just as open to questions as you say you are, but you haven't actually asked me anything. What issues do you find with my posts? The only crime I've committed so far in my posts is disagreeing with you and the lack of reasons presented is leading me towards an OMGUS vote especially since I voted you early on. It's also very nice for you that your vote without reasons is a town-tell, but after that vote no others can be that way. Let's not even mention the WIFOM inherent in saying your vote without reasons is a town-tell because scum would never do that because it isn't cautious!"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
I have several things to respond to so I'll break this up into parts.
I don't really see a pro-town motivation for a day one NL. There's very specific situations where NL is a good idea and they don't happen very often. If he was truly committed to it I could see why he kept pushing it, but I would consider it at least anti-town to push NL so hard.populartajo wrote:
Same question, Shooty. Can you find some protown motivation in veerus suggestion or do you think its more likely to come from scum?Shotty to the Body wrote:Not lynching scummy players in this game is a mistake. If we let someone who acts scummy slide they'll just kill themselves that night and we lose our chance at taking down a scum. This isn't a normal game where we could hold them in our pocket till we are ready to lynch them. The odds of shooting an infected player are exactly 1 in 6 if there are two scum and 1 in 4 if there are three scum. Those don't exactly seem like good odds to me. We need to have day time action to give the PRs something to work with instead of a shot in the dark after a NL.
FOS: Veerus
I agree with the assessment of the plan, but I agree that this is more of a noob play then a malicious attempt by scum. Suggesting that all vanillas commit suicide is more insane than veerus' NL plan.fallen angel wrote:PP, there are so many flaws in that plan it isn't even funny. You
1) Want all basic townies dead, which would out the power roles and most likely get them infected before they can be killed.
2) You might be able to, but if your plan fails we lose the game. Not worth the risk.
3) How are the townies supposed to commit suicide? Get mod-killed? We get one lynch a day, and I'm not wasting mine because you want to out the PRs and make a scum win more likely.
Unvote, VotePaperPenguin. That is probably the most anti-town statement I have ever heard.
BM- Post 129 was a misunderstanding, I thought LoS was Lynch on Sight as suggested. The post 127 was mainly to get his reaction. Your stance on Mokina doesn't entirely convince me, but I admit it was a fairly weak statement. It was mostly due, again, to the misunderstanding of what LoS meant.
Charter is either misunderstanding me or misinterpreting me on purpose. If you read 31 I said we had a 50/50 shot of taking a scum out if SCUM counter-claimed a legitimate town claim. Charter posted in 37 that he was afraid if town counter-claimed a legitimate town claim we would lynch two power roles. In 39 I say I agree with him (meaning 37 that we could lynch two PRs if a real PR counter-claims) that counter-claiming is a bad idea, but I still disagreed that claiming as a whole was a bad idea. We can judge each claim as they come, but counter-claiming probably wouldn't help us. There's no contradiction between my posts, I remain in favor of claiming as a PR instead of letting yourself be lynched and I defer to Charter that counter-claiming is probably not a good idea.charter wrote:'m suspicious of Shotty for 39 where he says "I'm saying while it may not be a bad idea to claim, it IS a bad idea to counter-claim as town since we don't know how many of each role is out there" which is a direct contradiction to what he said in 31 with his talk about a counterclaim giving us a 50/50 chance of lynching scum (which it doesn't) being good, but which requires counterclaims. I really have no idea what brought this around other than looking like he wants to agree with me or Mokina.
See my response to BM, being emotive isn't a scum-tell, it means I'm involved and I care about what's happening. Two votes with no explanations is stupid, now that the reasons have been presented I can respond logically. If you vote with little to no logic you can't expect a defense that has logic either.charter wrote:Shotty wayyyyy overreacts to two measly votes in 121.
More suspicions without reasons which turn into votes, can you explain your suspicions of myself and fallen? What bad vibes are you getting from Mokina? I would've waited since you said you were going to flesh it out, but you posted this morning and didn't.Kelly Chen wrote:Ok, I went through all this. I'll keep it brief for now because I'm tired.
unvote
Battle Mage: I don't have a feel for his alignment but I think his posts have been helpful (directly or indirectly). And I agree with some of his recent opinions on other players. A bit concerned about his NL vote and the post where he explained it.
Mokina: Has anyone played with her before? Is she playing normally? I'm sorry to say that the vibes I've gotten from her are not too good.
I have some suspicions of Shotty and fallen.
I was thinking I liked Rally, but on rereading a couple of things bothered me.
I can't come to much conclusion on charter, malt, pop.
I have a positive feeling about veerus.
I can't see from Paper's posts why he'd be scum. Normally I would take his apparent flaking as a small scumtell, but he's just a Goon if I remember correctly, so I don't guess what happened.
I was liking Kid but I can't remember why.
I'm going to have to flesh this out a bit later."By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
I must admit right now after re-reading a couple of Rally's posts and doing a full re-read of all of Veerus' posts I am not liking his town odds. I don't really see any attempts at scum-hunting from Veerus, all he does is propagate his NL plan. He doesn't scum hunt so he has no suspects so he likes the idea of NL. He claims that town is in a favorable position if we let our night roles shoot it out with the scum. The scum have a huge advantage during any night time action, scum know who is on their side and who isn't, scum get to pick anyone for the scientist(s) to counter them (t)he(y) would have to be everywhere, the guard is more likely to shoot a fellow townie then a scumbag, and meanwhile the scum get to infect a player of their choice. I already pointed out to him our bad odds at night against scum and he still pushes this plan. I agree with Rally's 221, we really need to pay more attention to Veerus' actions or rather his lack of them.
Vote: Veerus"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
Unless I'm mistaken BM's last post was Sunday last week. I thought the posting requirement in this game was at least one per three days?
Mod: Has BM been prodded?"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
Very possibly, I'm leaning towards him or FA, though I nee to reread Charter's posts about Kise. I'm coming home from vacation tomorrow I'll be writing up a more thoughtful post then.Kelly Chen wrote:Shotty, is veerus the lynch?"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
Veerus has done little to nothing besides push NL and claim we have no clear idea who to lynch so we just shouldn't. I feel like a lack of scumhunting for a majority for the day makes his plan self-fufilling(sp?) as he doesn't scum hunt, therefore has no suspects, therefore likes NL. My second would be FA, but his V/LA status means I have a hard time asking him questions at this time.populartajo wrote:
Okay, time to sort this mess.Xylthixlm wrote:Day 1 Vote Count
Mokina -2(Kelly Chen, Battle Mage)
veerus -2(Rally Vincent, Shotty to the Body)
fallen angel -2(populartajo, Kise)
Kise -2(fallen angel, charter)
populartajo -1(Kid Know Nothing)
Rally Vincent -1(veerus)
Not voting: malthusis, Mokina
With 12 alive it will take 7 to lynch
Deadline: July 21
Chen and BM, why are you voting Mokina? Who is your second suspect?
Shotty, why are you voting veerus? Who is your second suspect?
Charter and fallen, why are you voting Kise? Who is your second suspect?
veerus, why are you voting Vincent? Who is your second suspect?"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
I'm willing to shift my vote if necessary to prevent no lynch, but I'd hope we can come to a consensus before we're forced into lynching based on deadline. Why did you switch to FA instead of Kise, Rally?"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
Well the question becomes how to proceed from here, if there were three scum to start we have another to hunt and we can look at yesterdays actions. If not, we could be hunting a ghost and the newly infected can play off that for a mislynch. Either way yesterday's actions can't really be considered evidence of innocence so we are essentially back to square one, but one step closer to winning after we hit FA."By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
What I meant was if there are two left (starting with three and lynching one) we can look at yesterday to ascertain the second's identity, it almost seems like we have to assume that to have any kind of debate, but we could be setting ourselves up.. Obviously we have a newly infected one we know nothing about as of yet."By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
Guard got infected? Guard didn't want to shoot someone when they weren't sure of alignment? How does the phrasing of the mod's post imply no security guard? It's pretty clear that Malthisus died of infection according to the death post, I'm pretty sure somewhere in D1 we talked about the guard not randomly shooting people if he wasn't sure."By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
I have to agree with The Replacement that speculating about vaccinations probably isn't going to get us there, it's wheels with wheels trying to guess a vaccination and then counter-guess the scums infection pick, makes my head hurt just thinking about it and isn't very helpful. Are you still suspicious of Veerus over his NL plan Rally?"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
Do you really think that one post by Chen made Malthisus feel like infecting her BM?The Front Page wrote:If you vaccinate an infected player, you prevent them from infecting that night."By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
Yeah I was about to point that out, that doesn't make sense Charter. Do you think I was infected last night or do you think I've been scum from the start? You can't have both and this smells like role-fishing to me."By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
It's more of a gut feeling, not sure how to explain it to you, but I don't see how he could write such an inherent contradiction into his post on without having some ulterior motive and it sticks out to me because of that."By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
I have to agree with RV, FA was sunk so far in it would've been hard to pull him out of the hole as Veerus-scum. Even if he tried it might backfire and then they would be down two players. If veerus is scum his only play there considering how many people were MIA etc was to bus FA."By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
I understand where you're coming from with the original scum theory, but what makes you so sure he didn't get infected? Yesterday he was fairly active and came up with a plan that he thought was helpful to town and commented on most everything. Today he's done nada. Thoughts?"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
Two scum left, I had originally thought there would only be two scum total because of the way recruitment in this game worked, but I've reconsidered. If there were only two scum a D1 lynch followed by a guard kill, hitting a scientist protectee, hitting a test subject or any combination of these would result in D1 gameover for infected team, so that can't make any sense. Post 358 by Malthisus is a giveaway, but I did not think of it that way until you and Charter pointed it out.populartajo wrote:Im posting in this game tonight.
In the meanwhile, I want EVERYONE to comment in their following post.
How many scum LEFT do you think there are? And why?"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
Mind posting some reasons for that Chen? You completely buy BM's guard claim? Why do you think Kid is completely cleared?"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
I don't really have any problem with what charter is proposing, I'm still waiting for the separate post from Chen that she promised to explain why she thought I was scum."By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
[quotw="Kelly Chen"]1. he can be seen as feeling out Rally to see if veerus can still be voted. He agrees with Rally. When charter doesn't agree, Shotty still wonders if veerus could be recruited. charter doesn't really agree and Shotty drops the subject.
2. asked BM whether he thinks I made malthusis recruit me with one post. Actually I think this was just an easy question to ask, as I don't think BM could have supplied Shotty with additional arguments that would help Shotty vote me at that time.
3. Shotty's strongest stated suspicion today was about charter's inconsistent theory. This doesn't result in a vote, FOS, or even follow-up comment when charter doesn't answer the issue. Isn't that extremely odd? I suspect that Shotty didn't see charter as a viable lynch target. So while it was worthwhile to point out a suspicion (backed up by another player already, how nice), it didn't look profitable to go after him.
Plus, charter basically dropped his Shotty suspicion immediately, so why tempt it to return. It just looks like Shotty wants to be friends with charter if at all possible.
I'm sad Shotty didn't get to post between my vote and unvote for charter.
4. His questions of me are why I ruled out BM and Kid. He doesn't present his own suspicions, and he doesn't question any of my scum possibilities except himself. Doesn't he want to say, that no, veerus can't be scum, or that maybe he could be scum? Does he want to talk about Rally, or anything?
5. When has Shotty ever expressed suspicion of Mokina/Replacement? He mentioned Replacement once (an agreement with him), and only buddied with Mokina. He's just ok with trusting charter that she/he's the lynch today?
So in conclusion, confirm vote: Shotty[/quote]
1. Rally's been in favor of lynching Veerus the entire time, I wanted to know if he still thought Veerus was scum after flipping FA on D1. I said before I didn't think the NL plan was scummy, my suspicion moved away as he became a more active participant on D2. Charter's post 495 gave some pretty convincing reasons that Veerus is most likely clean and I didn't see much evidence to the contrary.
2. I thought that was a thin assertion to make so I asked him to clarify, not sure what you're pointing out here.
3. Charter has been on several people's (possibly) newly infected scum lists, but not mine, so I haven't pushed for his lynch. I was pretty sure of his townishness yesterday and nothing he's done today has changed my mind about that.
4. Sorry I didn't give you all of my ideas before I finished asking you about yours, that would be stupid because my ideas could change your answers and I wanted to see what you had to say first. Maybe I'm a selfish ass, but I like to answer people's suspicions about me before I talking about others, ignoring your suspicions of me and moving to talk about others right away is a scummy deflection, even if you want me to do that apparently.
5. Kise and Veerus both made similar votes based on Charter's analysis on page 22, he did the leg work without a doubt and I hadn't done a lot of looking at The Replacement before, but does that mean I should totally ignore a logical line of reasoning? Do you have a problem with Kise and Veerus "trusting" Charter as well? I don't have to trust the player to trust a logical argument.
I like how in the PBPA I'm apparently silly for not questioning Veerus as a recruitment choice after I decided he wasn't original scum even though two posts above that one Kelly ridicules the idea of Veerus being a recruitment choice.
As far as my question about KKN goes your position is still rather muddled as far as I can see, you claim to have cleared him in your mind, but you admit in 577 you thought he was scummy yesterday so what's the deal?"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
mother of all Ws FML.
FixedKelly Chen wrote:1. he can be seen as feeling out Rally to see if veerus can still be voted. He agrees with Rally. When charter doesn't agree, Shotty still wonders if veerus could be recruited. charter doesn't really agree and Shotty drops the subject.
2. asked BM whether he thinks I made malthusis recruit me with one post. Actually I think this was just an easy question to ask, as I don't think BM could have supplied Shotty with additional arguments that would help Shotty vote me at that time.
3. Shotty's strongest stated suspicion today was about charter's inconsistent theory. This doesn't result in a vote, FOS, or even follow-up comment when charter doesn't answer the issue. Isn't that extremely odd? I suspect that Shotty didn't see charter as a viable lynch target. So while it was worthwhile to point out a suspicion (backed up by another player already, how nice), it didn't look profitable to go after him.
Plus, charter basically dropped his Shotty suspicion immediately, so why tempt it to return. It just looks like Shotty wants to be friends with charter if at all possible.
I'm sad Shotty didn't get to post between my vote and unvote for charter.
4. His questions of me are why I ruled out BM and Kid. He doesn't present his own suspicions, and he doesn't question any of my scum possibilities except himself. Doesn't he want to say, that no, veerus can't be scum, or that maybe he could be scum? Does he want to talk about Rally, or anything?
5. When has Shotty ever expressed suspicion of Mokina/Replacement? He mentioned Replacement once (an agreement with him), and only buddied with Mokina. He's just ok with trusting charter that she/he's the lynch today?
So in conclusion, confirm vote: Shotty
1. Rally's been in favor of lynching Veerus the entire time, I wanted to know if he still thought Veerus was scum after flipping FA on D1. I said before I didn't think the NL plan was scummy, my suspicion moved away as he became a more active participant on D2. Charter's post 495 gave some pretty convincing reasons that Veerus is most likely clean and I didn't see much evidence to the contrary.
2. I thought that was a thin assertion to make so I asked him to clarify, not sure what you're pointing out here.
3. Charter has been on several people's (possibly) newly infected scum lists, but not mine, so I haven't pushed for his lynch. I was pretty sure of his townishness yesterday and nothing he's done today has changed my mind about that.
4. Sorry I didn't give you all of my ideas before I finished asking you about yours, that would be stupid because my ideas could change your answers and I wanted to see what you had to say first. Maybe I'm a selfish ass, but I like to answer people's suspicions about me before I talking about others, ignoring your suspicions of me and moving to talk about others right away is a scummy deflection, even if you want me to do that apparently.
5. Kise and Veerus both made similar votes based on Charter's analysis on page 22, he did the leg work without a doubt and I hadn't done a lot of looking at The Replacement before, but does that mean I should totally ignore a logical line of reasoning? Do you have a problem with Kise and Veerus "trusting" Charter as well? I don't have to trust the player to trust a logical argument.
I like how in the PBPA I'm apparently silly for not questioning Veerus as a recruitment choice after I decided he wasn't original scum even though two posts above that one Kelly ridicules the idea of Veerus being a recruitment choice.
As far as my question about KKN goes your position is still rather muddled as far as I can see, you claim to have cleared him in your mind, but you admit in 577 you thought he was scummy yesterday so what's the deal?"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
What changed your mind about me being original scum? That makes no sense. If I was original scum I would not have hammered FA, taken the NL for D1 and killed myself, leaving Malthisus + Recruited while the town wasted another day trying to kill FA.charter wrote:Reread Shotty and he doesn't look that good. I can see him as either original scum or infected.
40 is incredibly scummy.
He has agreed with me on almost everything, which I don't really think makes a whole lot of sense due to my stance on FA yesterday. I also find the fact that he has not voted at all today scummy.
Shotty, why have you not voted today? Who are you most suspicious of and why?
unvoteArgh, I am really torn here. Shotty doesn't look very good. He definately hasn't been looking for or trying to lynch scum today. I also kind of get the feeling that he's waiting for someone to get to L-1 and speedhammer then suicide tonight.
I am like 95% sure at least one of Replacement and Shotty is scum after rereading him, but unfortunately we only get one shot at this.
I haven't voted because both my targets are essentially no goes. I don't want to vote The Replacement until he is replaced or we're backed against a deadline and I think BM is the other scum to be honest. Who forgets their guard power? I think BM was the guard or the guard got infected so he's safe using that claim to blow through today. He claimed at 3 votes which kept any sort of real wagon from forming before two people jumped off. Now he's just laying low while we lynch someone else so he can suicide. Voting him now is pointless because I won't get a lynch on a guard claim despite the fact all he's done today is lurk after he made his claim. The scum won't forget that he's guard if he really is so he should be doing everything he can to post a lot and be pro-town right now. Assuming we have a scientist and he targets BM that won't make a difference, but I don't want to participate in a mislynch while we wait.
Why in the name of God would I be sitting around to speed-lynch suicide? I haven't been near the top of anyone's list until just recently, I simply have no reason to do that even as scum. That's all WIFOM however so I'm not going into it further. What gave you that feeling? Is that just some hunch or what?"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
That theory all hinges on someone else showing up, as you correctly noted before that lynch it took everyone there to do it, I could've easily held off on lynching FA without much risk there.
How is being informed scummy? The only way to figure out other people is to keep track of their opinions, so when someone switches a vote without much explanation it makes sense to ask them why. I didn't try to convince RV to change his vote, he simply didn't supply any reasons so I wanted to know where he was coming from. He'd only mentioned FA once in recent memory up to that point.
What major discussion was I ignoring? The posts about KKN? I was still waiting for Chen's post explanation post about why she voted me so I could respond, why do I get crucified for not deflecting?
By the way I asked you why not voting today was scummy, and all you did was reiterate that it was. Both the people I think are scum are hardly lynchable so my vote doesn't mean shit, afaik you gave up on your BM suspicions for today which I disagree, I agree with your Replacement suspicions. If I had voted I'd be getting crucified for going for an easy lynch on two people not here for the most part (BM) or not at all (The Replaced). cwutididthar?"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
I didn't try to lynch anyone else or convince people otherwise, the wagons were equal and RV didn't post much about PP/Kise or FA up to that point so I asked him why he voted one over the other.charter wrote:
I don't think it does. You made your promise to ensure a lynch a ways before deadline, then I feel like you had no chance but to honor it. This whole argument is WIFOM, so it's largely pointless. However, if there was a no lynch by one vote and you weren't on, you'd come under fire the next day. If FA suicided that night, you'd be lynched for sure. If FA lived through the night, he would come under heavy fire the next day, as would you. Hammering I think is a null tell, what was suspicious was you trying to get someone besides FA lynched.Shotty wrote:That theory all hinges on someone else showing up, as you correctly noted before that lynch it took everyone there to do it, I could've easily held off on lynching FA without much risk there.
By asking people where they stand you become informed, I've been repeatedly criticized for asking people for their thoughts. There's nothing inherently wrong with that.charter wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what you are asking here.Shotty wrote:How is being informed scummy?
No one asked me to give a run-down of every player in the game, you were all answering each others questions, RV was the only one who gave a complete rundown of LoS and doing that gives scum a target list of who's "infectable" and who isn't.charter wrote:
Myself, Kelly, and RV were posting significant thoughts on most players. I believe Kise chimed in as well. You didn't really say what you thought on anyone, just popped in to question why you were being voted.Shotty wrote:What major discussion was I ignoring? The posts about KKN? I was still waiting for Chen's post explanation post about why she voted me so I could respond, why do I get crucified for not deflecting?
Right, townies never worry about the consequences of their actions, by trying to avoid something scummy I do something scummy? Pushing for an easy lynch is easily twisted into something scummy. There's your rock and a hard place.charter wrote:
Not voting is scummy because then no one knows where you actually stand on people. Also scummy because scum like to stall/lurk until they get a good feel of where everyone is at, and then start talking in order to benefit themselves. Voting for The Replacement would have been totally acceptable, as would voting BM. That right there is practically a scumfession, refusing to vote because you're afraid of the consequences. No one has been crucified for placing a vote and I can't see a townie being afraid of voting.Shotty wrote:By the way I asked you why not voting today was scummy, and all you did was reiterate that it was. Both the people I think are scum are hardly lynchable so my vote doesn't mean shit, afaik you gave up on your BM suspicions for today which I disagree, I agree with your Replacement suspicions. If I had voted I'd be getting crucified for going for an easy lynch on two people not here for the most part (BM) or not at all (The Replaced). cwutididthar?
Vote: The Replacement
If I had to choose BM should be countered by either PR in the game so Replace is my choice. Have at it, watch me get criticized for voting now."By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
Your post 540 pretty much sold me on the Replacement charter, the PRs should be able to wrap this up if we make the correct lynch. Out of the pair I think are scum he's the logical choice. The BM situation should take care of itself via guard or sci and you posted several compelling reasons that the Replacement could've been scum. Poptajo's pairing also makes sense though, Chen and KKN have had each other's backs. KKN 472 defends Chen against BM, which was his last post before disappearing if that means anything to you all, and Chen has been calling KKN town for reasons only she understands since 566. I can see either one of those pairings being logical, but my money is with the BM/Replacement for the lynch. Even if we mislynch the Replacement, BM shoots Chen or KKN in the face and we get another scum down. I'm really reserved about BM's claim though, his post 534 was ecstatic when someone else suggested he be left alone and he's done nothing but lurk since. His one post, 595, pretty much assures me that KC scum and BM scum are mutually exclusive."By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
charter has target fixation now, no matter what I post he's seeing it as scummy.
What else am I supposed to say about it charter? You worked all the angles on Mokina and that evidence is pretty thick, I don't see how you can think the original scum case on me is stronger than that one considering you were confident enough to say Mokina was definitely 100% scum yesterday. I pointed out two posts that could tie KKN and Chen together, it was relevant to the case pairing pop mentioned so I thought I would post it so the town could make their own opinions. I fucking said I think Replacement/BM is the scum pair and I've been saying that, I'm not omniscient so I had to consider the possibility tajo has the correct pairing and I don't, so I posted something about it. I don't give a shit who BM shoots because I don't think he's actually a guard, that's just a possible scenario if I'm wrong and pop is right."By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
Mostly Mokina's D1 play, in retrospect. She was not on the FA wagon, she buddied harcore and encouraged confidence in FA early in the day, and did nothing but policy votes on lurkers. Like I said, your post 540 was pretty damning and I didn't find anything different when I re-read D1."By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
And before you were so torn between me and the Replacement, how long before it's BM and tubby? What happened to your 100% surety that Mokina was scum?"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
So let me double-check this tubby. You replace a player you think was scummy enough to lynch by the 14th page. After your re-reads you've been all over the place, with RV or myself or Kise (as an afterthought) as original scum and then Kelly or Veerus or BM (as an afterthought once again) as infected in your 637. You change your mind about BM after he admits he was fake-claiming because of....? Didn't see any real reasons other than that you would do the same thing drunk? Now you've switched Veerus from infected to original scum, even though you'd already read D1 when you said you thought he was infected. Your stream of consciousness posting is full of back-tracking and contradictions, mind codifying your position for me?
BM what's with the fake-claim man? Is your real claim VT now? You have been ever so unhelpful as a vanilla if that's your claim. Everyone here knows your scum meta is lurker and that's all you've done this entire day after a fake-claim, even if you aren't lynched you haven't helped us at all. If the roles weren't open I'd say you'd been playing like a jester ffs.
Tajo, Veerus, anything to say or is it just a lynch liars policy vote or what?
Kise, what is that 663? OMGUS much?"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat