834 - Grimm's Pokemon Madness Mafia - Over
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Suave, you attacked a player for attacking another player, even though there's no reason for you to care who attacks whom at this stage in the game. The only reason that you would be biased with regard to who attacked whom was if someone attacked a scumbuddy (or fellow mason, maybe); hence, attacking another's attacker without already finding that attacker scummy is suspicious. Does that make sense?
The problem with dramonic's mention of it in this case is that this can't be a chainsaw defense unless he himself is scum. If he is town, he should know that you weren't chainsaw-defending him, because you couldn't be his scumbuddy.
Either dramonic was joking, or he slipped.Unvote, Vote: dramonic-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Chainsaw defense absolutely implies scum, as even your second sentence illustrates. That's why it's a "standard tell," and why it is relevant to discuss.
I think your second sentence is a little mistaken. As written on the wiki, chainsaw defense is scum --> town --> scum, where"-->" means "attacks." A scumplayer attacks a player for attacking his scumpartner. In this situation, that maps to Suave --> SK --> you. But you'd know you were town if you were, so you wouldn't interpret this circumstance as a chainsaw defense. That you did otherwise is suspicious.
It is possible that one of us has misunderstood CD. If so, you may not be scum.-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Jebus, I think it's clear at this point that dramonic didn't mean it as a joke (consider his post 58). He either misunderstood CD a bit and thought that it meant that scum chainsaw-defended townies (e.g. maybe that scum uses it to buddy with the attacked townie), or he slipped.
Nikanor, please introduce a new conversation topic if you find the current one unproductive.
Spinach, I am wary of transparently stochastic play. Please try to list nonrandom reasons for your choices in the future so that we can interpret them.-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Jebus, you think this is a joke? --
But that's neither here nor there.dramonic wrote:Chainsaw defense doesn't imply scum. It just implies A defending B by attacking C because C attacked A.
It's a scum tactic and as written in the wiki, the one who is usually scum is the defender, not the defended.
Also, it was just there, was I suppose to ignore it? No, no I wasnt.unvote, Vote: Spinach-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
For anyone who was interested in Zaz's question, I gave a serious answer to Spinach's question because he didn't look satisfied with Nik's non-serious one (the ellipsis post).
I wish Zaz had claimed how this ability worked before she used it. Does its failure mean that Spinach is town ("failed to take one of the threats to the town with him"), or just that she had a vig ability with a chance of backfiring? I'm assuming the latter and keeping my vote where it is for now.-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I agree with Nika that Haylen's comment about Sir could be a scum slip. If it were an honest mistake, I'd think she'd probably have acknowledged/contested my comment.
Spinach is really scummy. First, he says he's a trainer, then he says he only thought we were trainers, then he says he's a doctor with minimal flavor. The only thing on his side is Zaz.
SK still needs to say whether he's a Pokemon.-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I agree with dramonic. Spinach's claim is very odd. The Mod has let us know that odd stuff will happen, but a line has to be drawn somewhere.-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Spinach, why are you voting Jebus instead of Kise?-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
His point is that if Spinach's scum, his lynch is such a foregone conclusion that it's unlikely that his scumbuddies will continue/begin to actively petition against his lynch. So it's harder to evaluate anything new that happens from here on out.-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I want Spinach to answer before I respond to dramonic.
It was an unintentional reference, I think, Jebus.-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I think a good example of the utility of fakevoting to get reactions can be found from the first time Jebus fakevoted to put you at L-1. Kise opportunistically hammered. We learned that Kise wanted to end the day early without actually having to end the day early. You can also sometimes get scum to claim scum when they think they've been lynched, which is great for obvious reasons.
I think scumlists are useful, but townlists are not useful in most games. I think advertising town reads tells the mafia who to kill more than anything else.
I agree with your comments about Haylen and Kise.
Please answer my question, though. Why did you vote Jebus for his fake hammer when you didn't (until now) pick on Kise for much the same thing?-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
It's unclear to me whether Jebus's L-1 fakevote was intentional or not. Either way, though, it resulted in Kise "hammering" you. My confusion was why Kise didn't seem to get much grief from you for this.
Why did you think that Kise wasn't scummy when he was the one who hammered you without letting us work out the details of your role?-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
You could've let Spinach answer my question. The Mod won't write the death scene until tomorrow, since he doesn't have access on weekends.
I think Spinach can still talk until the death scene, though, right? (The rules don't clarify.) Spinach, if you could answer my question to help us understand your read on Kise, that would be helpful.-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
So I think there're 8 alive instead of 9, right?
The Meowth kill could mean Haylen was some kind of traitor, but it's difficult to say because Haylen seemed fairly scummy yesterday IMO (low scumhunting, the possible slip about scum daytalking). If she was a traitor, scum may've been trying to set-up Nikanor as lying about his Daykill (not knowing she was actually scum).
If not, the kill may've been due to a vig or SK, as it seems unlikely that scum would kill a potential mislynch. But that would mean that SK successfully protected last night, which is probabilistically unlikely. (Scum could also have a delayed kill, I guess.)-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I see the doctor breadcrumbs you're referring to from SK, but I think calling that a "subtle counterclaim" is a stretch. At least, I didn't leap to that conclusion, certainly not with enough certainty to justify hammering, and especially not when I had directed unanswered questions at him and other players (fallen) had specifically requested we wait before ending the day.-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
When did you claim there were no trainers? I've just looked at your iso and the only time you've typed "trainer" was in that post. Moreover, even if you had claimed as much, I think that would make you more suspicious rather than less because we had good reason to believe there were scum trainers and little reason to believe otherwise. That you hypothetically believed there were no trainers is better evidence that you have extra knowledge about the set-up (e.g. by being scum) than anything else.
It's impossible for us to evaluate whether you really thought that about SK's hypothetical CC. In retrospect, it's clear that he was breadcrumbing; it's less clear that that was the basis for your hammer.
Who do you think is a better lynch than you?-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Simulpost. That last question stands, though.-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
@ Sir -- Only the "doctor" post qualifies as anything like a soft claim IMO. The other remarks are comparable to what almost all of us were saying about Spinach.
Fair enough, Kise.-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Nikanor, I was referring to Spinach's claim that he was a trainer. He was quite scummy and claimed to be a trainer. This constituted good reason to believe there were scum trainers IMO. I posted that because Kise had claimed he had never thought there were any trainers, whereas in fact he had never commented as much in-thread and had good reason to believe trainers existed via Spinach's claim. We ultimately learned that Spinach was a Pokemon after all, but only Spinach and (maybe) scum had access to that information yesterday.
I agree with your other three points.-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
If my current vote isn't doing anything productive and another player has done something suspicious, I sometimes unvote to indicate that I am preparing to vote for a different player. The Kise wagon had died down for the time being and I agreed with you that MrSuave's comment was odd, so I weakly supported it.
I'd encourage you to introduce a new conversation topic if you don't like the current one, but I suppose you at least asked about my unvote.-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Assuming that scum is Jessie/James/Meowth as per Nika's speculation, scum may have been able to infer that Spinach was not a trainer, especially coupled with the opening post, which specified that we were Pokemon. I bothered mentioning it to emphasize that Kise's hypothesis that there were no trainers may be scummy.
Sir, when does a vig kill give as much information as a lynch?-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
So long as we're waiting --
Nika, what do you make of MS's explanation of his behavior? I ask you specifically because he alluded to a game he played with you as the source of his confusion.-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I think a good case can be made against Kise. The attempted hammer on Spinach was untimely; it occured when more than one player was still waiting for responses from Spinach. His explanation -- that he wanted to keep SK safe -- is plausible, but the breadcrumb was a little weak to justify such a drastic early hammer IMO. I also don't like that he took me backing off as an excuse to lurk rather than as an opportunity to scumhunt.
Before Jebus mentioned as much, I had just begun to suspect Sir, to be honest, largely because he seemed to begin to weakly suspect me just after another player (you) had expressed suspicion of me, even though I felt like I'd addressed your concerns adequately. I thought he might be testing the waters to see whether your view of me had changed and which other players might have doubts about my play. This is a pretty weak case, which is why I hadn't mentioned anything. However, it looks like Jebus may have some privileged information/more compelling observations, so I'll wait for that.-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
EBWOP: You probably want me to comment on MS. I think he may be scum, but he's hard to read because he may just be making errors. You're probably in a better position to judge him than me because he's (I assume?) your RL friend. On that note --
MS, we've heard a lot about your history with vigs and so forth but not a lot about your reads. Who do you think is scum, and why?-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I unvoted you on the basis that a case had ALREADY come up for MS, and a pretty reasonable one. I don't like to keep my vote on someone if it can be put to better use elsewhere. It's possible that Jebus's case might be enough for me to vote for Sir; I'm not sure yet. My own read on Sir is weak, but I wanted to mention it because it was topical.
You'll notice that I've already made these points in previous posts. Since you haven't bothered to allude to them even to refute them, this may imply that you're more concerned with finding me scummy than evaluating all the content to determine my alignment. This is scummy, but I want to wait to hear Jebus's information before placing a vote.
I apologize for forgetting about your note that you'd be posting every 2 days. But you'll have to forgive me for making that mistake when you went from highly-active to largely-absent just after I agreed to temporarily put your case on hold.-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I didn't end up voting for MS because I was satisfied with MS's explanation. There was no reason for me to distance from Sir because I hadn't attached myself to him.
Kise's post is again disingenuous. I've already explained why I mentioned my weak suspicion of Sir. That he brings this up again without even acknowledging that I've already answered his question emphasizes that he is not reading my responses critically. He doesn't care about the answer to his questions; he just wants to use them rhetorically to convince other players.
If you think 2 votes will make me claim, you are mistaken.-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I voiced my suspicions when I did because Nika had just asked for them. I can understand how someone could interpret ulterior motives into the timing of my mentioning it, but it was really just as simple as that. You (Kise) and Sir made the cut because there's a decent case against Kise and Sir was topical. I added MS afterwards because Nika was voting him and I figured that was what he was really curious about.
Why is it obvious that knowing my elemental type determines whether I'm Team Rocket? Are you assuming that Jesse and James are represented by Ekans and Koffing or something? I'm hesitant to give information to a player I suspect may be scum, especially when you've implied that knowing my type will let you use some kind of ability.-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
This is what I was referring to. In the context of the post, it comes just after you congratulated Nika for his deductions and just before you suggested that lynches only "sometimes" give more information than vigs (contradicting my prior point). So, in context, you praise Nika, ask a penetrating question at his former suspect (me), and then undermine me in the discussion with Nika (in a way that didn't make much sense to me). Again, and as I originally stated, it was weak suspicion, and I didn't think it was much of a case yet; I only mentioned it because I was asked directly and it was topical.Sironigous wrote:
Why do you think that scum knew what Spinach was?Iecerint wrote:We ultimately learned that Spinach was a Pokemon after all,but only Spinach and (maybe) scum had access to that information yesterday.
I am skeptical that Kise's ability works the way he says it does (why would he be so open about it if it did?), but I figure my type is unlikely to mess anything up, and I'm curious about Kise's information. I am a water-type Pokemon. There's one more note I'd like to add about this, but I want to hear from Kise first.-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
It's certainly possible that you didn't mean it that way, and I considered that, which is why I both specified that youweaklysuspected me and termed my case weak, but that's the passage I was referring to.
This is the part I perceived was intended to undermine my argument. It came just after what I quoted above:
I used the word "undermine" because the tone of your contradiction seemed intended more to discredit me than to argue for any specific position.Sironigous wrote:
... sometimes.Iecerint wrote:It [A vig kill] doesn't give as much information as a lynch, though.-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I've only seen the very beginning of the show. I was really into it when I was in 5th-6th grade. I remember Ekans and Koffing evolving (I think) and Togepi appearing (very vaguely), but nothing beyond that. If there are other canon TR Pokemon, I don't know them very well. Also, I'm not familiar with any Pokemon after 152 or so.
The thing I alluded to wanting to add is that while Wikipedia lets me know that my Pokemon is water-type, my PM doesn't explicitly give me the type -- not even in the flavor text. I'm a little skeptical that your ability is based on elemental type when players aren't explicitly told their type. Granted, that sort of thing is probably more null in this game than in other games.-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
How much of it was fake? All of it? Lacking the ability you claimed you had, what did you hope to gain from bluffing like that?
Vote: Kise. I may unvote if Kise has a reasonable explanation or Jebus's case against Sir is uncommonly strong, but it seems remote after a scummy hammer, a scummy attack, and this latest stunt.
Nika, I would encourage you to skim through my iso.-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I thought it was "girlfriend," to be honest. That's what I think automatically when I see "GF." I couldn't remember whether the Meowth character was supposed to be male or female (I think the VA is male, but...).
My own role name is kinda tailored to my Pokemon role a bit, so it didn't occur to me that Meowth's role would be as simple as "GF." I found Spinach's "Doctor" claim bizarre for the same reason.-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I think there may have been a miscommunication. The "accusation" (NB: I just doublechecked, and I think I've actually called it "expressing suspicion" and "ask a penetrating question" -- never "accusation" AFAIK; I think that would've been an exaggeration) is a separate event from the "undermining." The sequence of events (all within one post) is 1. Sir high-fives Nika 2. Sir asks me the "penetrating question" 3. Sir undermines my view.Sironigous wrote:
Actually, there I was. I don't see how that was an accusation though - and it wasn't meant to be - it's a theory topic! Just like in real life, put together theories and find the best one using support, observations, and analysis...Icerint wrote: I used the word "undermine" because the tone of your contradiction seemed intended more to discredit me than to argue for any specific position.
I think you guys are really taking it out of proportion. It's not like I voted for him over this. I just answered Nika's question with it because it was on my mind and therefore the only honest answer to his question.
Why do you keep taking out the first "e" in my name? O_o-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Kise's claimed ability seems pretty worthless to me. I thought it might be used to catch fakeclaims, but scum apparently has very little motivation to lie about their elemental type. I guess it's possible they wouldn't have bothered with keeping type consistent if the scum roles were pretty scummy (humans, or Ekans and Koffing) and they just wanted to claim anything else, but they certainly will now that Kise's claimed the ability.
If Kise is town, he has played poorly, or he is lying. The only circumstance where it was OK to tell us about his ability would be if he had another stronger ability, but he's already told us he intends to use the elemental-checker tonight, so he must not. He shouldn't be using it unless he has to because it's now easy to circumvent its role in finding fakeclaims. For that matter, it's also useless in evaluating my element claim, because he claimed it before I did. I think it is simplest to assume that he is scum trying to establish a credible cop-lite PR role in hopes that we will give him the benefit of the doubt.
To people who know the source material better than me -- is there a canon Pokemon ability that determines the alignment of other Pokemon (similar to Kise's claimed ability)?-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco