Mini 801- Kubrick Mafia (Over)

[cateraction]

Vote: Blood Covenant

The best lynch the town will ever get. So anti town.

Also, in a gladiator fight, he would lose.

[cateraction]

Gladius. It's called a gladius. That's why we're gladiators. My vote stands. Kid's dead weight.

[cateraction]

I'm so curious what I gain by doing this.

I am Sparticus!

[cateraction]

Is anyone not Spartacus?

Blood: Why would you assume we are all spartacus, I don't think everyone has posted. Do you have some knowledge of the setup that I don't?

[cateraction]

Why? As a town person who wasn't spartacus, I wouldn't claim. Townies shouldn't lie. I'm curious how this affects the game and so I'd like the information in.

[cateraction]

I guess that's a good point.

[cateraction]

Wait, which is it? Do you share his concern? Or do you think misspelling doesn't make a difference? Or do you believe my claim based on breadcrumbing I tried to do.

[cateraction]

I didn't know what it meant to claim Spartacus, I was just told that it might be advantageous to do it. I thought I'd give it a bit instead of blurting it out right away, but I bread crumbed in case something went wrong. I didn't know that everyone was Spartacus, and I think that's clear.

[cateraction]

BC didn't get the same role as me, that's good enough for me to press him. Also, I agree with Orto, the vagueness and style of play are consistent with how I've seen BC play scum before.

[cateraction]

That was pretty darn rash.

[cateraction]

unvote

Well, if he's telling the truth. Which there's no reason to assume he isn't day 1. Then would it be safe to assume that most or all pro-town players are Spartacus, and those lying are not? [/quote]

[cateraction]

Wait, why is lazarus at L-2? Is there even a case against him?

[cateraction]

BC: You're not even on the wagon. Why are you defending it?

Skitzer: Anything else to contribute to the game? What do you think of BC's claim? Any theories about the game setup? Any comments on the Lazarus wagon?

[cateraction]

Well, either you think the case is valid and will vote him or you do not and are witholding your vote. I see you fence sitting which I find scummy.

[cateraction]

Based solely on that he hasn't posted a lot? What about the others who have not posted? What about Spitzer? Would you hammer him?

[cateraction]

Vote:Muzz

Again, for not knowing something that I know.

[cateraction]

I'm thinking Spartacus claims activate this power.

Hmmm, hadn't thought about this. I'm liking the idea, though.

This. Anyone else see what I'm saying?

[cateraction]

Sorry, the "again" was because that was my reason for voting BC. I now apply it to you. I was told that claiming spartacus would be advantageous and the fact that you did not think it would be a power up leads me to believe that you did not receive a spartacus role. Hence the vote.

[cateraction]

My top two suspects are Muzz and Infinis.

If I were cop I would investigate BC.
I don't like the "if I were scum question" but I assume you mean who do I think is most pro-town. In that case, BC.

[cateraction]

Can we get a full claim from Muzz now?

[cateraction]

Vote Muzz

Not even gonna try?

unvote; Vote: Infinis

[cateraction]

Vanilla clam shouldn't dissuade us from lynching. I'm OK with a hammer at this point.

[cateraction]

unvote

After having reread my role pm.

[cateraction]

Sorry kids, don't know what to tell you. It's been a while, forgot the name. When I was pushing the case muzz it was because of spartacus related info, not the name. It just slipped my mind.

[cateraction]

Oh, and just to clarify. I do not believe that a VT claim should derail a lynch. However, this is different because of the rolename.

[cateraction]

But he validated it. I disagree with you that scum would know the VT rolename before it has been outed.

[cateraction]

Vote:pads

Agree that a no lynch is always bad.

[cateraction]

Reckoner, who did you block?

[cateraction]

Gah, I'm so sorry, please disregard the post above. I'm in another game with BC and Laz and totally forgot which game I was posting in. Gah!

[cateraction]

Vote: Infinis

I think it's a good lynch.

[cateraction]

Infinis is obvscum.

BC: Infinis has claimed VT, so you're either going to get a VT or a scum claim. Knowing we have other power roles makes this a decent lynch even if infinis wasn't obvscum.

[cateraction]

Hammer anyone?

[cateraction]

Ooh, how fun.

Vote: Skitzer

[cateraction]

BC, results?

[cateraction]

If I'm reading this correctly, we have a mafia roleblocker left who can't kill and roleblock on the same night (obviously). So we shouldn't have any more night kills, and the scum is hoping for a mislynch during the day. If he kills at night he's risking BC nabbing him with an investigation. S

If we have any more power roles I would urge you to claim now. If we have another pro-town power-role we no lynch and can win this game tomorrow.

Otherwise, here's how I see the game breaking down.

Roffman - BC clears him. Town.
Muzz - Probably town, but I'm on the fence.
Orto - We all thought infinis was scum, I don't think it tells on him. He was attacking pads before it was opportunistic. I say town.
Laz - Faintly scummy.
BC - Cop.
Cat - Sexy man.
Ash - Faintly town.
Kise - I think he was trying to appear pro-town by defending infinis seeing as their was so much against him. Faintly scum.

I'd support Kise, Laz, or Ash lynches right now but I'm not particularly certain of any of them. I would be dead set against orto, BC, or Roffman lynches. Lets hear from some others.

[cateraction]

Cat - Sexy man.

Your avatar suggests otherwise

Your post seems to imply that you consider BC's claim confirmed. Is that correct?

Nietzsche was very sexy. Check out the 'stache on that guy! lol

I do think that BC is confirmed. His spartacus role that pads uncovered, his not knowing about the extra role, and his correct ID of skitzer confirm him, and thus roffman.

BC: The way it usually works is that the RB can either block or submit the kill, but not both on the same night. I'm curious what happened night 1 that led to a no kill. I guess there's another power role that we don't know of, and I strongly urge them to come forward so we can plan this out optimally.

[cateraction]

Well, massclaim isn't going to accomplish anything that just asking the power role to come out. I don't expect that there is more than one unrevealed PR right now. It should be self-evident that they should come out in order to win this game. Lets do this.

[cateraction]

Mafia can almost never do two actions in one night, that's just how it is.

As to how we could win.
Scenario with a Doc:

Doc Protects BC
BC investigates
Mafia kills doc.

This is with everyone doing their optimal play. If the doc doesn't protect BC, he dies. If the mafia doesn't kill the doc, they can't kill the cop and they're screwed.

This would give us 3 confirmed townies: BC, Roffman, whoever BC investigated (if innocent) or (if we're lucky) he hits scum. Assume the former for arguments sake (obviously if he gets scum, we lynch scum and win).

3 confirmed townies, 1 scum. Pretty darn easy win no?

[cateraction]

If no PR does claim, we'll just have to scumhunt the old fashioned way. Because a kill from scum means we get an investigation from BC right?

[cateraction]

Bah, i thought I had a good idea with the claim, but I think now I was wrong.

Vote: Lazurus

For being against the pads lynch.

[cateraction]

I highly doubt we have anything more than a cop, doc, and mafia left. But by all means if we do they should claim.

[cateraction]

I guess that makes an abrupt end to that discussion.

Vote: Kise

[cateraction]

Word, Orto and Muzz had a great call on Pads.

[cateraction]

He couldn't have said it was spartacus mafia, everyone would have know from the start how it was gonna go down. This was better.