This seems to have prompted almost all the of the rest of the discussion to date. So I might as well stick it up the top of my first real post.Lunar_Tick in #43 wrote: I find it really annoying that you guys are making so much of a fuss about a clearly random, at least for now, choice. Even though it is day one, surely we can find something better to talk about.
I fail to see the connection between 'we' and 'you had something better to talk about'. This is pretty weak no? The rest I agree with though so carry on.raider8169 in #44 wrote: You said we like you had something better to talk about yet you didnt mention it in your post. The clearly random choice is causing disscussion which is good. Why try to stop it?
What? Who are you talking about here, and why didn't you vote for him?MonkeyMan576 in #58 wrote: Unvote:
Vote: LunarTick
He seems to be admitting that he made his choice knowingly without consulting anyone else. It's one thing to say you didn't know that his vote would be final, it's another to say that you know and deliberatly left others out of the discussion.
What?MonkeyMan576 in #58 wrote:I'm sorry I mispoke. Defending the move is just as bad as doing it, if not more so. Like Prom King said, it's unlikely scum would actully choose a path this early, but having someone defend the tactics worries me.Lunar_Tick wrote:@Monkeyman: You seem to be confusing me with Rogue Shenanigans. Maybe.
Gah - I don't like this post. I only really agree with the part about MM being suspicious and also the use of the word 'tactics'. The rest seems really a) very defensive and b) is full of the same sort of assumptions you are accusing MM of making. At this stage in the game we are all assuming and accusing to get a read on people.Lunar_Tick #62 wrote: Your whole post and vote assumes that the choice has any kind of bearing on the game. You are very far from being sure of your claims, at least not close enough to make any kind of conclusion and subsequently vote on it. And if you are sure of your claims (and it seems that you are), then you are highly suspicious.
Also I don't like the way you use the word "tactics" in your post, when there was clearly no under-hand mafia scheme but rather a random choice.
I agree with the first part of this, and think the whole random choice v scheme thing is being overstated. Nobody seems to think RS is scum, or that he acted in a scummy way. We just don't know yet. LT seems to just be stating opinions to me.MonkeyMan576 #65 wrote: You're not in a position to say what I'm able to come to a conclusion on and vote for. All I need to vote is to think that you are more guilty than anyone else. And I clearly do. The only way you could know if there was a scheme or if it was random choice is if you were scum, a townie would not know the difference.
How is this last sentence worth a bandwagon? RS jumps on LT immediately after this post, and it all starts going from there. This was a joke no?Lunar_Tick #66 wrote: Or maybe the mod told me.
Forget the fishing for a moment. This second part is scummy. Lurking, cruising, posting with no real output or production. This is the important part. I'm going toRhinox in #142 wrote: Freeko was fishing. Hard, and obviously. He used an invalid assumption that you and LT are scum mates (based on nothing more than you defending LT) to try to pry more information out of you about your role.
Aside from that, freeko hasn't really done much. He hasn't been scumhunting, and he's thrown out Japanese proverbs that seem like nothing more than a charade to try to make himself look smart.
Occam in #143 wrote: OK - Rhinox has cleared up my issues concerning him. Thanks.
freeko in #13 wrote:vote : rogue shenanigansfor choosing a path without asking anyone else. Maybe it is you who hangs from the lynching tree?
freeko in #130 wrote: Korts, I am no more or less scummy for looking at Occam and having the same reaction to it as you do. I just have not gone so far as to vote for him yet. Though you seem to have missed his last response where he made the clarification to his using mislynch instead of bad lynch. Maybe you did not see this. Or are you just trying to make everyone else look bad so you somehow avoid suscpicion?
Apologies -4> All votes must be unvoted before the next vote is counted. Votes reset each day.
Even with freeko's vote still being in place 100+ posts later, I read this four times before the posibilty that it wasn't a joke vote entered my mind. So I asked why freeko hadn't moved his vote to the people who was suspicous of - the anyone I refer to below is Occam.freeko in #13 wrote:vote : rogue shenanigansfor choosing a path without asking anyone else. Maybe it is you who hangs from the lynching tree?
Sipylus wrote:freeko- You don't seem to have found anyone better to vote for, and your vote on RS seems jokish? Why didn't you vote for Occam? Or is your vote on RS serious?
freeko wrote:I have not been convinced by Rouge that his choice of path was not either pre-meditated or some manner of an act of sabotage that will come into play later in the game. I cannot help but think that he has knowledge of the path and knows what will come from going certain ways good or bad.
Korts wrote:Also, nice baseless accusations at RS.
This says to me that if I believe RS's vote was random, I should believe that your vote is scummy dirt throwing. As this *is* what I believe, its a good thing I'm already voting for you.freeko wrote:No more or less baseless than his choice of path.
Sipylus in #143 wrote: I'll hop back on MonkeyMan576 as per my post #128 for the time being and do a proper post tomorrow from work.
No, I'm going to vote you "for being the person that I think is more guilty than anyone else atm".Sipylus wrote:In an entirely unrelated voting action to MM not realizing the claim, I just realized that I didn't vote with my last post.
"Syphilis, or the French DiseaseJuls wrote:Not game related:freeko wrote:@siphylus: ...
Be careful with the "h" insipylus...it changes the entire name and kinda grosses me out. :oops: