Mini 700 - Monta Vista Mafia (School has ended!)
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
And actually,Unvote, Vote: Mr. Javierfor this nasty story:Mr. Javier wrote:So it's a Japanese myth, the name isn't that important though. It shows themalegod. And he has thisspear. And he shoves it into theocean. And then he takes itout. Then this saltystufffalls to the Earth and formsland. The firstchildrenof the gods. [/i]Mmkay[/i]?-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
Of course. He sounds too much like Mr. Mackey. Maybe he is.Jebus wrote:You tried to lynch a teacher >:0-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
I was hinting at this in post 79. I think he is basically just Mr. Mackey from South Park, and that the italics and stuff are just for flavor.MiMo wrote:I'm reading and one possible thing to note is that MR. Javier has some words in italics. I'm not sure if it means anything or is some kind of a code...I have been trying to figure it out with very little luck thus far.
Is that I-talian or somethin?Jesus wrote:And more votes on a Carny wagon.por favor
Why'd you want to wagon the person you're sitting next to? That's not nice.
That I don't like the annoying teacher?teh furreh wrote:And the case on Carny is what again?-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
Belgian Lover wrote:You assumed that he was pushing for a claim. Why is this, exactly? I may have missed something, but still.Jesus wrote:Bandwagon stage = stage where a person is wagoned for pressure on the basis of a minor fos/scumvibe,to get results.
Emphasis in the second quote is mine. No, Jesus wasn't asking me to claim, but he was certainly headed in that direction. I wanted to explain the fallacy before we got that far.Jesus wrote:Is this a claim I see, or did I miss something earlier?-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
What did I "poison"?JDodge wrote:
You got your poison in my drinking water.CarnCarn wrote:Belgian Lover wrote:You assumed that he was pushing for a claim. Why is this, exactly? I may have missed something, but still.Jesus wrote:Bandwagon stage = stage where a person is wagoned for pressure on the basis of a minor fos/scumvibe,to get results.
Emphasis in the second quote is mine. No, Jesus wasn't asking me to claim, but he was certainly headed in that direction. I wanted to explain the fallacy before we got that far.Jesus wrote:Is this a claim I see, or did I miss something earlier?
Are you supporting the mindless wagon-to-claim strategy?-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
OK expert, point me to a game where wagoning never comes down to claiming. And for one to talk about "poisoning the well" you sure did that yourself. I never said that that was "all" is comes down to, just implying that it's usually an end result.That's not what it comes down to. If you think that's all it comes down to, go back to newbie games until you really understand what wagoning is all about.-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
You're right, but I'm not liking your defense of Jebus. You seem to be confident of his motive. How are you so sure he wasn't going for a claim? I don't like the "oh, well wagoning is just part of the game" defense. Like you said, there is the idea of pressure to generate conversation, but, there is also the idea of forcing revelation of role-info. You seem waay too sure of which intent Jebus had in wagoning.-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
Not really. And your vote on me for assuming one interpretation of wagoning is in itself a statement that you assume Jebus was wagoning for another reason (the one you gave above, #2). Basically, you are willing to dismiss any malicious intent on his part, without even waiting for him to fully respond to my accusation, on the grounds of an alternative reason for wagoning.-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
He did say that though. Look above. His whole argument amounts to a defense of Jebus for wagoning various people (especially me, I guess). He assumes Jebus' reason for wagoning was protown (just pressuring, creating conversation, etc.), while I, admittedly, thought he had a more malicious intent, especially for shifting wagon to wagon at this early stage.scotmany12 wrote: Where exactly did he defend Jebus? What I see is him attacking you for making an assumption. I do not see JDodge saying that Jebus was never looking for a claim.
See above paragraph.scotmany12 wrote: This is simply not true. Once again, I do not see where JDodge is defending Jebus. He does not dismiss him or anything. What I see is him attacking you for something he finds scummy.-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
Well, I'm not absolutely sure, just a suspicion. Maybe JDodge is right and I was assuming too much. But, I didn't like the wagon shifting and I assumed the worst. Maybe it is a mistake, but better that I steer clear of it. Anyway, legitimate conversation can still be had with a player without wagoning them. Certainly, it's not necessary to wagon every player just to get them to talk (and that was kind of my fear with what Jebus was doing; he wagoned 3 different players, looking for early "results", when I don't think that's really the best way to go about it). His switch from your wagon to mine was never well explained (aside from the ridiculous "oh he tried to lynch the teacher, he must be scum"), nor was the shift from me to collie (that last one especially strikes me opportunistic; that is what I was trying to suggest with my "eagerness" comment).Because he never said that he wanted claims. How are you so sure that he intended that? As pointed out by BL, there is more to a bandwagon than getting claims.
So, there you go. That's why I interpreted what I did from Jebus comments on wagoning.-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
I understand that that is a possible reason for wagoning, but I don't think that's why you're doing it. For one thing, it's not necessary to wagon every player just to get them to start talking. For another, all of your votes, except for the first one on me, have been "piling on" type votes, which scum prefer to do and just say "I was just adding pressure" as an excuse.Pressure wagon = scare people with lynch, claim or die time doesn't come in. I'm not really interested in claims. I just want people to slip up under pressure.-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
Also
Feel like explaining?CarnCarn wrote:His switch from your [MME] wagon to mine was never well explained (aside from the ridiculous "oh he tried to lynch the teacher, he must be scum"), nor was the shift from me to collie (that last one especially strikes me opportunistic; that is what I was trying to suggest with my "eagerness" comment).-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
Why? I see scummy voting pattern and I assume scummy intent for wagoning. How does this mean I'm scum?Your immediate assumption that I'm looking for a claim is scummy.
I could agree with him if all he said was "wagoning doesn't always mean wanting a claim" but he pushed it too far and seemed to know what your exact intent was. I never understood why my assuming what I did about your wagoning (his original "this one is easy" scum-tell) is a scum-tell at all, especially not if I have other reasons to justify thinking so.Jdodge's defense of myself is scummy (in terms of how it was done).-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
1. It's humor/a joke.pickemgenius wrote:
I completely disagree with this statement.CarnCarn wrote:Bah
Unvote: Jesus
Vote: Belgian Lover
This.Anticollie wrote:(PS: Double checking posts before hitting submit is for people who have shit to hide, amirite?)
like 1000% disagree.
If I felt like voting right now it would def be for carny.
Yes I know Lassie said it, but this coupled with previous events put you on top.
Back to slashing my wrists but in a miraculous random event MCR comes on my WMP and I decide I want to live.
rejoice!
2. What previous events?
3. Why don't you feel like voting?-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
Way to point out my two most meaningless posts (one from page 1 and another that was simply an attempt at humor in a quite serious thread so far) and completely ignore everything else I've said.Anticollie wrote:CarnCarn: A gent who has thrown up three votes, one of which was obv a joke vote. He seems to be attempting to scum hunt but tends to pull at straws. I can find him attempting to begin discourse, but then he changes directions and discusses his class schedule.Don't get me wrong, I like discussing meaningless sod as much as the next fellow, but for someone who is clearly attempting to get the game rolling, lets do just that. QFTing one of my early self-antagonizing posts this late in the game is simply contrary
What's wishy-washy? Examples please.Anticollie wrote:As far as I can tell, Carn's decisively wish-washy play style has made it challenging for me to agree with anything he says, or that I'm missing a part of the whole picture.-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
Right, when people make vague generalized observations I question them about it. Examples of said vagueness:Anticollie wrote:With 17 questions being issued thus far, scaling the spectrum from unhelpful to socratically meaningless (Ie: consistent 'why?' 'O RLYs?' and 'how so?') I am aggravated by your lack of forthrightness...
I view this as a muddled attempt to appear thoughtful in discourse, yet actively prevent information from being gleaned.JDodge wrote:Vote: CarnCarn
This one is easy.JDodge wrote:
You got your poison in my drinking water.CarnCarn wrote:Belgian Lover wrote:You assumed that he was pushing for a claim. Why is this, exactly? I may have missed something, but still.Jesus wrote:Bandwagon stage = stage where a person is wagoned for pressure on the basis of a minor fos/scumvibe,to get results.
Emphasis in the second quote is mine. No, Jesus wasn't asking me to claim, but he was certainly headed in that direction. I wanted to explain the fallacy before we got that far.Jesus wrote:Is this a claim I see, or did I miss something earlier?
Let's have a closer look at the posts you linked:Jebus wrote:Agreed. Change the wagon,
unvote
Vote: Lassie
From your perspective, this was just "restating the obvious":
This is a legitimate question because it was never addressed by Jebus and I felt it was important to know why he was switching wagons so frequently. You are incorrect in saying that Jebus isCarnCarn wrote:Also
Feel like explaining?CarnCarn wrote:His switch from your [MME] wagon to mine was never well explained (aside from the ridiculous "oh he tried to lynch the teacher, he must be scum"), nor was the shift from me to collie (that last one especially strikes me opportunistic; that is what I was trying to suggest with my "eagerness" comment).startingwagons; instead, he is merely climbing into them to "add pressure" which is a difference I was trying to make clear.
And the second post you linked:
This is also a legitimate question because it presents a possible contradiction. For someone who was preaching about not using absolutes unless one is absolutely certain, JDodge did use the absolute "never" and I wanted to ask him how he was so sure.CarnCarn wrote:JDodge wrote: I never said anything about his intent.
You're sure you're not sure?JDodge wrote: He never supported a claim.
Clearly, you seem to be suggesting that my questioning has not been useful, and you would prefer it to stop. But I see no reason to appease you; there is no way my questioning has in any way lessened discussion or amounted to the mere simplicity that you state as just "restating the obvious"
You get a bigFoSfor suggesting this.
My understanding is that the FoS is for the way JDodge went about explaining Jebus' intent for wagoning, not about whehter or not they agree about that intent. Like I said, JDodge seemed confident about one interpretation for the wagoning, which may suggest that he knows something about Jebus that we don't.My Milked Eek wrote:I don't understand Jebus' big FoS on JDodge.-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
9) OK, so I believe I'm at 3/5 votes. Lynching me is not good for town, but no lynch is probably not good either.Flameaxe wrote:Rules:
9) If no majority is reached at the deadline, no-lynch will be achieved and lynched like the scumbag he/she/it is!
Monta Vista Specific Rules (MUY IMPORTANTE!):
13) As stated in rule 8, each game day will last exactly 14 days. This being said, the game has a special "Lights Out" like mechanic that you cannot "turn off". As many lynches as you like may occur within that timeframe.
If people want me to claim, I will, since we are getting close the deadline. In fact, since we're so close to the deadline, I'm going to go ahead and soft-claim anyway to give enough time for discussion: non-vanilla, basic flavor is that I don't really care about school.
13) "Lights Out" would be good for town. Can we get that sooner rather than later, please (in case someone/some people is in charge of that)?-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
MME, yes I may have overassumed, but I don't think it was necessarily wrong to assume given what I thought about Jebus switching wagons giving no reasons for doing so.
I don't understand why I was voted by JDodge just for assuming this. Yes, he was correct that there are more reasons for bandwagoning than getting claims, but I was confused when he started being so adamant that Jebus was "never" looking for a claim. I think Jebus' statements were too vague to imply either way why he was wagoning and I just found JDodge's confidence a bit misplaced.-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
The thing I found strange about this "bussing" is that JDodge suggested lynching Mimo first. I don't see JDodge doing that to a scumpartner, unless they were getting desperate and both trying to buss. Also, his suggestion to lynch Mimo was kind of random and he gave no reason for it. I don't really see a cross bussing, here.-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
While I agree that people should definately post more in this game, your "me, too!" votes aren't adding anything, either. Sure, you'll argue that you're trying to get people to talk, but if you really want them to discuss something, at least point out what you find suspicious.Jebus wrote:unvote
Vote: MiMo
That's much better, and works for me.
As to my flip-flopping, well, I want something to happen (= post more!)
I'm a bit concerned that you are continuing this line of play from yesterday; I don't think your actions really fit with your stated intentions.
Vote: Jesus
scotmany2 and PEG: Can you please post your thoughts on the JDodge lynch and whom you are finding suspicious now?-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
I'm skeptical at the moment for the reasons I mentioned in 228. I would like to see MiMo provide more content than just "Trust me" posts, though.My Milked Eek wrote:Carny, what do you think of MiMo being the possible partner?
I would also like to see less pressure wagoning from Jebus, unless it is done concurrently with reasons for finding the wagonee suspicious. It's hard to start discussion if you don't accuse anyone of anything except to say something along the lines of "Hey, you're scum. Defend that."-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
Where was this yesterday?teh furreh wrote:
Dude. Actually give decent reasons for your vote, not just something along the lines of "Yeah, let's go with the flow".Jesus wrote:unvote
Vote: MiMo
That's much better, and works for me.
As to my flip-flopping, well, I want something to happen (= post more!)
Vote: Jesus
Well, his reason for voting Jebus is the same as mine basically, but I want to know why he chose to vote him now, instead of earlier when Jebus was doing the same thing.homoscot wrote:Vote: StrangerCoug
Seriously, this guy has done absolutely nothing, even though he has clearly been around. I hate his vote on Jebus, seems like he is trying to start an easy wagon (in his eyes). He criticizes for him not giving decent reasons for a vote when he votes Jebus with no decent reason. And he basically put a HoS on MiMo for a null tell.
If you think this is true, what do you think about the lack of night kills? I don't think you are necessarily wrong to assume this, though.Lassie wrote:I do not wish to add a third leg to this issue, what with things beginning to complicate themselves, but what are the chances of there being two scum left? Quite good, as I can tell. (SK, etc.)
Now this is just confusing. homoscot is scum with Mimo? By extension they would both be buddies with JDodge, right? I don't think a three-person scum team is balanced in 9 player game, usually.Lassie wrote:Thus the following (completely theoretical) scenario threatens my mind: Scot attempts to divert pressure from Mimo, his scum partner, just as things are getting good. (As per g-post 242)
Would you favor lynching both homoscot and MiMo today?Lassie wrote:Now is not the time for a wagon change. I do not believe MiMo is scum with a strong majority of my being, but I do condone this wagon because as we may be seeing here, people are being drawn from the dark recesses of Lurkerdom and forced to post. Such diversion from such successful means is hardly pro-town.
Vote: Homo
Yeah, he said he doesn't think MiMo is scum, then gave a situation where he thinks the two of you are scum together. I'm not sure what he's really thinks.homoscot wrote:Anticollie, you are finding me scummy for what exactly? You don't think MiMo is scum, yet you vote for me for "diverting" from her wagon? So is the other wagon on Jebus not a diversion? I'm guessing that is totally acceptable for you. Yet when I decide to vote for someone I find scummy, I am diverting from a wagon on a player that you don't even think is scum. Yeah...your vote is making absolutely no sense.
Honestly, I'm not sure. It sounded like something ridiculous to say, but he was obviously being serious about lynching me. If it's a complete joke, I don't know that he would mention a scumbuddy.Edith wrote:Am I really the only one thinking that quote from JDodge was a joke (or an attempt at one)?
I Don't Know, It's No Big Deal.Edith wrote:
This meaning...Lassie wrote:"IDK INBD"-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
It's been almost a week and we haven't heard from Jesus.CarnCarn wrote:
While I agree that people should definately post more in this game, your "me, too!" votes aren't adding anything, either. Sure, you'll argue that you're trying to get people to talk, but if you really want them to discuss something, at least point out what you find suspicious.Jebus wrote:unvote
Vote: MiMo
That's much better, and works for me.
As to my flip-flopping, well, I want something to happen (= post more!)
I'm a bit concerned that you are continuing this line of play from yesterday; I don't think your actions really fit with your stated intentions.
Vote: Jesus
Mini, unofficial VC: MiMo (3), Jesus (2), teh furreh (1), Not voting (2: MiMo, John Madden), 5 to lynch-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
Pretty sure Mimo was at L-1... (4 votes, 5 to lynch). I counted Edith, Jesus, Lassie, and teh furreh on that wagon.Jebus wrote:Do I smell rolefishing? Or are we at L-1 claim or die time?
I think it's more likely the be the first.
Of course, you're not on the wagon anymore, but that doesn't change my point.-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
Would you rather I, or someone else, hammered without asking?MiMo wrote:I would but, don't have anything worth claiming. I don't really like that you asked me to however. I don't like people pushing for roleclaims.
So, you are claiming vanilla, and then attacking someone who has claimed non-vanilla, and also was clearly against JDodge-scum all of yesterday.
I don't really see the point of your vote.
Generally claiming at L-1 makes sense. I've also not been a fan of your wagon since, well, all of today, if you haven't noticed. I would have hammered anyway without asking for a claim if it seemed possible to get 2 lynches today.
I'm not liking the massive lurking by PEG and scotmany. It's killing our lights-out "advantage." I think a PEG wagon makes more sense, but it's a gut call and a general distaste of lurking (especially when we have lights-out).-
-
CarnCarn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: September 27, 2008
-