hectic that flavor is super great!
VOTE: lilith!
i mean, i thought your push one me was bad, and i explained why. not sure why you're spinning that as overdefensiveIn post 32, Dunnstral wrote: I think you overexplained youself here which felt overdefensive
why vota?In post 35, lilith2013 wrote:I’m happy with my dunn vote although votato is a close second
idk i've certainly done very similar things like this so this bit in particular i don't find aiIn post 76, lilith2013 wrote:I don’t think that’s what’s happening here though - votato seems to be simultaneously calling dunn probtown while keeping his options open to scumread dunn. I don’t think it’s a case of “haven’t found a better vote,” he pretty explicitly said he’s still voting dunn because he could be scum.
if he was planning on backing down because it was a fake push i would have expected that to have happened alreadyIn post 116, Morning Tweet wrote:a lot of people don't openly admit their pushes are weak early on. It's actually funny sometimes how big the gap between how good the push is and how confident someone is about it. I think he was playing it up in an attempt to sort you, so it doesn't really make sense to see it as town!Dunn backs down and scum!dunn doubles down
am i tunneled/focused on dunn too much?In post 127, Clover Ebi wrote:How do I say this properly...
Lilith I looked at your back and forth with Dunn and I think you're a bit tunneled/focused on him too much. Like, if Dunn is scum I doubt a lot of the reasons you're calling him scum went through his head and was an action he decided to consciously take as scum. That's just, so much early game when really it isn't needed at all.
this is a weird reason to vote clover imoIn post 133, lilith2013 wrote:What a strange post. You’re talking to me like you know I’m town and you’re talking about Dunn like you know he’s town and you’re trying to defend him but you’re not actually pointing out anything towny about him, it’s a very null defense.In post 127, Clover Ebi wrote:How do I say this properly...
Lilith I looked at your back and forth with Dunn and I think you're a bit tunneled/focused on him too much. Like, if Dunn is scum I doubt a lot of the reasons you're calling him scum went through his head and was an action he decided to consciously take as scum. That's just, so much early game when really it isn't needed at all.
VOTE: clover
do u have experience with clover?In post 147, midwaybear wrote:Also, clover ebi is using a lot of emojis. I think this could be because he is nervous and paranoid about his posts.
i'm not sure what the difference is between me and lilith then?In post 149, Clover Ebi wrote:I looked at your iso again and it seems very reasonable/open. You're talking to others and taking other angles that don't involve Dunn. I don't think you're tunneled atm.
oh dearIn post 158, Tuxedo Mask wrote:Wow, sorry I'm so late to the party guys. This game is moving fast. I don't like Beeboy's entrance at all. It seems to try and derail the momentum building on Dunn, before swinging into to defend him when he starts posting content. What's up with that? Why did you want people to say hi so much?
VOTE: Beeboy
literally cuz i was in a good mood. not sure why people are attributing more to it than thatIn post 166, drusilla wrote:was this the point of the exclamation points? to gauge reactions to them?
i disagree and i don't get what you're trying to say eitherIn post 174, Tuxedo Mask wrote:or if they just hopped on with a defense of Dunn it probably wouldn't have stuck out,but the two together feels calculated(?).
i'm not sure that scum make a point of not picking a side there tho?
eh okIn post 201, Nahdia wrote:uhhh actually i misread it. i thought it said you were getting no pings on anyone, not that you were townreading them. my impression was that you were excusing yourself from forming reads
VOTE: beeboy
didn't think it was an overactionIn post 214, Nahdia wrote:overreaction to tux.
bad reactionIn post 206, Dunnstral wrote:Then skitter/lilith/votato reacted to it like crazy and it kept going
you still haven't explained why 'exclamation points being uncommon for me' and ' being a vote-worthy behaviorIn post 209, Dunnstral wrote:Yep, that's what I'm on about
feeling offIn post 245, votato wrote:talk to me about nahdia? i have a hard null read there.
tbh i feel like this is more you smearing beeboy than beeboy smearing tuxIn post 250, Nahdia wrote:and suddenly beeboy is smearing him as "centering all his content around this 1v1" (I explained why this doesn't make sense)
i feel like scum continue pushing that tho?In post 263, Nahdia wrote:as i said to midway, no, 188 isn't towny. scum will often back down and try to appear cordial. not saying town can't too, but i can 100% see that coming from scum!beeboy if my assessment up till then had been correct.
i've seen a few different townies just treat everyone as town until they know otherwiseIn post 310, votato wrote:i think assuming people are town kinda leads to complacency and insufficient critical examination. if thats your playstyle then ??? but ive never seen it before and feel that its more likely a scumslip
i actually have a similar vibe rn, so i empathize with it.In post 323, beeboy wrote:What do you think of clovers "I can't form scum reads" typically that's scummy because scum just know everyone is town so it can be hard on them.
In post 344, Morning Tweet wrote:Skitts gave me townvibes in our previous game enough to hold me off of her wagon when it really should've been obvious :X She has a handicap where i set her a bit down in my reads on purpose cause i think regardless of alignment she's going to trick me at least once or twice
their tone is off + i feel like they were using the beeboy/tux thing to initiate a meh push on beeboy that lacks merit and convictionIn post 337, midwaybear wrote:I do not really get the votes on nahdia right now btw. The stance on beeboy's frustration with tux was fine to me. I can sorta see what they mean by that, but I still think beeboy is overall more townie. I don't really see why scum would try to paint it as a 1v1 especially if there wasn't a lot of momentum at the time.
In post 283, Tuxedo Mask wrote:Nahdia seems to be talking about out of both sides of their mouth.
can i interest either of u in voting nahdia?In post 330, Raven Branwen wrote:I don’t understand Nadhia at all.
yeah i think that votato logic / mis-speak probably doesn't come from scum tbhIn post 373, Dunnstral wrote:I'm not sure what to think of votato having me as logical scum but actually he thought I was town and the logic was wrong. That's weird.
VOTE: lilith
And yes Mr Clover Ebi, I'd like your opinion
she has more 'heft' here than i've seen from her in recent scumgamesIn post 387, Dunnstral wrote:This feels like her method to shade/vote whoever she wants.
I'm not seeing any anger in her posts. She doesn't feel snarky - she's slimy, she seems to h ave an agenda to push
i don't know how to articulate this super well but i'll tryIn post 478, lilith2013 wrote:What has drusilla posted that pinged you as town?
In post 368, drusilla wrote:oh sorry. it felt unnatural to me, and i asked morning tweet because she is familiar with him and had just made a comment about him.In post 367, beeboy wrote:@Drusilla what do you think of Tux disengaging? Is more the question I wanted to know why you asked. Sorry that was unclear. What is your answer to that question?
i don't think she's scum here + how would the game make more sense if she were?In post 406, votato wrote:if lilith is scum here suddenly the game makes a lot more sense.
man these are really surface-level takes ...In post 464, Nahdia wrote:votato talking about townblocks all the time feels like buddiyng. not to mention admits he's apathetic as town and has the second-highest posts?
midwaybear gives all kinds of thoughts/analysis and then says they have no reads in 355.
ok so like overall what do you think of them ... ?In post 467, Raven Branwen wrote:That’s interesting, @votato, are you usually this engaged as town? But I don’t understand, Nahdia. Why does talking about townblocks read as buddying to you? This is my problem with you in a nutshell, you make one statement I can kind of agree with, then combine it with another that leaves me scratching my head.
i think i have a p good sense for her scumrange at this point, and i think she's out of itIn post 469, Kanna wrote:This kind of comment always feels townie to me, but i just looked through your scumgame (guns and roses iv) and errrr...i disagree. maybe i'm paranoid. i think you seem "townie" based on your fearlessness, but that's a playstyle. why do you say you're out of your scumrange?
they're random enough questions + she's persistant enough in trying to get teh answers that i think she has some reason for asking them and that it would help her resolve {whatever point she's thinking of when asking the questions}In post 483, lilith2013 wrote:I guess there might have been some underlying thread that she just hasn’t explained yet but I’d like to hear what that is
raven's not great. idk how much experience she has but she's p clearly having trouble getting into the game and is taking a lot of wishy-washy stances; in particular i noted her doing that on nahdia. i can see them being partnersIn post 488, lilith2013 wrote:Idk if it’s really as easy as raven/nahdia but that’s kind of where I’m at
ya fair, i was just elaborating cuz i sometimes find that rambling on about a read enables me to figure out how to articulate it better, and i think the persistance is part of what's contributing to the townreadIn post 492, lilith2013 wrote:Yeah I feel you - I’m not gonna argue that you’re wrong, I just want to see for myself what that thread was before I’m prepared to agree on that read
it's just more like ... there's a lot of things that's taken place ittIn post 514, Nahdia wrote:my reads are, in fact, surface level. that doesn't make them also not accurate statements that can indicate scum. i'm looking for scum motivation, and it's there in those posts i point out.
maybe can you share 3 spicy reads (excluding beeboy)? i think that would help give me a sense for where you're holding rnIn post 522, Nahdia wrote:i mean i see what you're saying here skitter. but it's day 1, there's no mechanical foothold in this game, and it's a bigger table by my standards. im gonna plead with you not to read too far into my disengagement. what do you want me to comment on?
In post 531, Nahdia wrote:i think, as scum here, it's probably very easy to just shove at me. but the way you're engaging seems less like "feeling out for a good mislynch" and more like an actual effort to sort me!
midway i'm tentative on because apparently he has a reputation for being scummy. i was back modding a game he was in where i kind of saw that. i would like to pressure that slot though. dunnstral i was fine with early because his initial vote was RVS and latching onto the tiniest reasons then is fine. but he's stubbornly held onto the read when i and others have asked him to go back and recontextualize it.
i guess i just like ... idkIn post 532, Nahdia wrote:morningtweet was kind of gut. there was one post in particular that made me think "oh this person is actually trying to sort". 334.
also i guess like if you're town do u think it would be easier for u to show ur towniness if i wasn't voting for you? i could back off a bit if u think that would give u room to be townie cuz we still have a lot of time but in a vacuum i think i still want to be voting uIn post 533, Nahdia wrote:mafia is weird because i dont like being scumread but it's also a lot easier to sort people when they're pressuring you. at least, i think so.
i shoul read lilith huh?
in raven?In post 549, Nahdia wrote:that you're pushing LHF that is. not that you are.
...In post 563, Nahdia wrote:which is it. do you need more content from our slots, or do you think we're scum?In post 488, lilith2013 wrote:Idk if it’s really as easy as raven/nahdia but that’s kind of where I’m at
VOTE: lilith