This is good. I like where this is going.In post 11, Wisdom wrote:We identify four townies and win. Townhunting is better than scumhunting and this playerlist is good for application
Why are you addressing Nacho?In post 102, Ginngie wrote:Spoiler: @Nacho
yo, so first read through it looks fuckin weird to declare you're obvtown when you make the above posts as they're NAI.
So first question is your thoughts on souls boldness of claiming obvtown when doing nothing in particular to make it obv. It's small in significance but hilariously enough, that's almost exactly how I planned on entering the game saying lol cool i'm town and focus on sorting you and mastina. idk like a look in the mirror type feeling.
A more direct question is the (fuck whats the word we use) retaliation vote by Elements onto Souls and your thoughts in general of Elements starting game voting patterns.
Generally I'm a very hard slot to read.In post 135, chennisden wrote:Nymph isnt a slot i particularly have a lean on
It's a light read and might be a bit rushed but it's like a pre page 10 read as well.In post 148, Xayah wrote:Did I miss the memmo? How are you people reading anything Chen/Ele said as...anything? I feel like when I read into anything Chen/Ele/Oversoul are saying in regards to each other it’s like a clique talking in girl talk about meta I have no idea about. So you guys having reads on them has me ???In post 76, Nymph wrote:This is good. I like where this is going.In post 11, Wisdom wrote:We identify four townies and win. Townhunting is better than scumhunting and this playerlist is good for application
I think based on page 1 and 2 that chennis and Elements are probably town.
HEAL: chennis
This is really bad. We're only at page 10 and you want to just focus one person because of a crumb?In post 223, Rakan wrote:We're either fighting or sparing Oversoul today.
Why?In post 229, chennisden wrote:BecauseIn post 226, Rakan wrote:I don't think it's worth discussing other reads before the mafia nightkill. Why do you think I should discuss other reads?
I'm willing to talk mechanics, why we should or shouldn't pick neutral.
As for Oversoul: He's either a pr and will die tonight if we don't spare him, or he's fake softing and should be killed for thata) I don't really think you're townand b) obfuscating reads hurts town more than it hurts mafia
In post 287, Ginngie wrote:I'm thinking Rakan is better sorted town than not because of whatIn post 226, Rakan wrote:I don't think it's worth discussing other reads before the mafia nightkill. Why do you think I should discuss other reads?Nymph pointed out earlier about Rakan not shooting himself in the foot so hard as scum.
I'm not seeing scum blatantly telling people they're not gonna talk about reads.
Bro are you fucking serious right now?In post 291, Ginngie wrote: Nymph posts nothing of value so far
hahahahaIn post 299, Wisdom wrote:is nymph being bad on purpose because it's an alt gimmick or
226 is kind of weird. I'm not sure what to think about it. Anyways, I tend to believe scum to keep a large portfolio of options as a means of an "out". Rakan clearly has not considered that most likely because he's town. When I play scum, I'm generally more agenda focused and tend to give myself many options in order to get out of a bad spot. I'm not a lengthy poster in general so one-liners and short responses are usually what you'll be getting from me.In post 301, Ginngie wrote:Your read on Rakan is based on his push on OverSoul as demonstrated in the spoiler
Spoiler:
Now, when i read your post, I looked into what you said, and found post 226.Which is completely different that discussing Rakan tunneling a player, as this is talking about not discussing ANY reads.In post 226, Rakan wrote:I don't think it's worth discussing other reads before the mafia nightkill. Why do you think I should discuss other reads?
So when I made the post declaring my read of Rakan, it literally goes me saying my starting reference point(YOU), and then going on to discuss how I further developed my read(Rakan not discussing any reads).
What would also help is if you understood what I mean by 'value'. I'm looking for interactions that are more than a couple of sentences. I can't in good faith call you town cuz you made one post I liked. I enjoy reading into interactions, which hilariously enough, I get to do now.
Now, what I particularly like is the emotion you showed. You first read my post and then went hey buddy wtf. Then 5 minutes later you vote me. Now the tone and the vote tells me two things. One, that I pissed you off, and second, that I pissed you off enough for you to come back and naked vote. I'm hilariously toxic way back and used to get dumb angry. One horrible habit is that I'd scum read anyone that I disagreed with vehemently. Now looking at yours, it's like looking into the mirror and seeing the a little bit of anger come out in the form of a vote.
How was that weird?In post 324, chennisden wrote:Okay that was a weird post chemist and i dont really like it
I never played with you before but this doesn't sound like a genuine response from the whole Rakan situation considering you almost completely ignored it until I asked you about it.In post 419, mastina wrote:What's town about them? I saw hyper-aggression. If I knew who Rakan was maybe I'd be able to judge that hyper-aggression in the context of "oh for Rakan that's town" or "oh for Rakan that's scum" but lacking that knowledge all I can really say is that in isolation nothing about it was town. Would Rakan be my vote if I were interested in genocide/neutral? Oh heck no. (Okay, so I can't outright rule it out, but I can say that almost certainly? Probably not.) But while Rakan's not someone I'm interested in lynching, he's also not someone I see any reason to save, either.
Who cares? He's clearly town and your self vote isn't doing much.In post 456, chennisden wrote:I wonder why i made this postIn post 437, chennisden wrote:also a lot of the content towards rakan feels very appeasy.
But he's obvtown so who clearly a higher contender of being saved compared to youIn post 459, chennisden wrote:But you're scum soIn post 457, Nymph wrote:Who cares? He's clearly town and your self vote isn't doing much.In post 456, chennisden wrote:I wonder why i made this postIn post 437, chennisden wrote:also a lot of the content towards rakan feels very appeasy.
Which were what again outside people (like you) discrediting the town-spew?
This is how scum!chennis would reply.In post 464, chennisden wrote:Idc if rakan is town because even if ur town sparing rakan is prolly in scums gameplan
I know them. They do not know me afaik.In post 402, Nachomamma8 wrote:Do Maria-Rakan-Nymph all know each other/are their avatars themed or something?
Stupidity is not AI.In post 538, chennisden wrote:why are people still tring this?In post 532, Elements wrote:Did everyone decide this game had no rvs and not tell me?
This is my first time playing with mastina but she isn't being pro-town right now so I'm going based on a standard mold of how I expect town to play.In post 673, Wisdom wrote:mastina is mastina. She can be like that as town.
If we had to lynch, id go for nacho, xayah, or elements.
But we're sparing gingie.
I have no experience with mastina so I'm using a standard mold. For future games, I'll have this to reference.In post 675, Wisdom wrote:Town aren't always playing pro-town. If youre so shallow you will rarely catch scum.
Nacho is much better than this as town.
