ur literally wrongIn post 921, Flavor Leaf wrote:Omochao slot probably scum still
not lynching mastina btw thats some bs right there
ur literally wrongIn post 921, Flavor Leaf wrote:Omochao slot probably scum still
this is dumb and the laziest hop ive literally ever seen in my life
this is not an elaboration at all. we know just from your first post that you didn't like the claim. all the posts after the claim are scummy too, but we don't actually get to know about that at allIn post 204, NotMySpamAccount wrote:Ho boy I'm gonna end up lurking the heck out of this game.A lot of the arguments here are based on meta, and I haven't played with most of these people, so I'm at a bit of a disadvantage. With that said, opening by claiming a role like that seems really fishy, especially if you've done it in the past as scum. None of mastina's posts since then have sounded at all towny, in fact most have sounded extraordinarily scummy.
a bunch of percentages that don't have any basis in reality, and mastina has now made towny posts?? aka she probably angry posted a couple of times and he's not sure that he can just stay on this wagon like a barnacle. how would your scumread stay at a 60% if theyve been posting towny recently + you were only scumreading them for ostensibly one post that you couldnt even elaborate on.In post 479, NotMySpamAccount wrote:Montosh (75%) and probably LUV (60%) are town. I really want to keep scumreading mastina (60%) for the claim, but some stuff has seemed kinda townie since. Still leaving my vote there though. If I had to guess, I'd say (20%) FL is town, and (30%) Clem is town, (17%) scum.
and then a final attempt at even looking like he gives a fuck he just says "please lynch mastina" as if he's actually contributing anything to this lynch happening. WHAT?In post 840, NotMySpamAccount wrote:I legit have no idea what's going on anymore. Pls help me lynch mastina cause at this point I'm not confident in anything else.
no you DONTIn post 926, Titus wrote:Ok, this can burn. I absolutely believe in what I say. If that's the only way you have to discredit me then well I will ho pe for your speedy death.In post 925, Omochao wrote:VOTE: not my spam account
flavor has been hedging on whether or not mastina is scum the whole game
titus has been making arguments for why mastina is scum that she doesnt even believe
nero is basically on crack
idk elbirn
nmsa is either lynchbait or trolling scum
on this note, last game on this alt i played, I wanted to avoid using meta but know i think thats kinda dumb,In post 927, Nero Cain wrote:says the dumb alt with an even dumber avatar.In post 925, Omochao wrote:nero is basically on crack
i literally dont careIn post 931, Nero Cain wrote:you do realize that Mastina talks about getting lynched as scum (for strategy) all the time. If you believed Mastina is intentionally trying to get herself lynched shouldn't this be like a red flage?In post 924, Omochao wrote:because mastina is like trying her hardest to make it happen
so we're back to the claim?Nero Cain wrote:I'm not all that sold that a scum A50 blatantly goes for a no lynch here. I mean I can understand the scum motivation in it sure but does he really do that b/c it seems like a great way to get lynched.
I still think Mastina's decision to claim (b/c other anti-town roles claim) is scummy and LAMIST. She's way too worried about herself here. (I didn't want to massclaim this role)
this devolves into a game of whether not sr means a tr, which is axiomatic and not worth talking about so ill skip this dialogue treeIn post 936, Titus wrote: @O Show me where I say mastina's town. I've been skeptical of Mastina since she claimed.
if you dont care about apathy why are you complaining about lurkers and and backseat modding to give out prods?In post 939, Nero Cain wrote:noIn post 934, Omochao wrote:aren't you the one always complaining about apathy lynches?
I mean that was your point, not mine. I just said if you believed that why would you not think its a red flag?In post 934, Omochao wrote:do you think mastina is actively trying to have everyone inactively lynch her?
although it doesn't seem that impossible that she claims to get heat off of (away) her buddies.
this seems infinitely more fun to talk about than the wonky claim business. i want to get back to this cause i have no opinion on this but lets follow this one to a "conclusion" first one cause i dont want to get distracted.In post 940, Nero Cain wrote:I mean true, I don't really like her reactions to me and her RAS stuff doesn't make sense and she's been avoiding commenting on it.
ok mastina claims to get her in lynch discussion to get heat off her teammates? but if we lynch her d1 off of a claim then after she's dead we wouldnt it be much easier to find her buddies then? why would she want that?In post 944, Nero Cain wrote:if Mastina is scum and we are busy talking about her lynch then her buddies are floating by undetected.
so are you gonna sit here and tell me that you havent changed your mind on mastina this game, and that everything you've said is just on one sliding scale of skepticism? i literally can and will claim semantics here. even now if i go more in depth as to why i dont believe that spectrum bs in idea x, it will end up clashing with some fundamental believe you have, you'll think there's no possible way i could say x while still being town.In post 943, Titus wrote:Nah, you don't get to accuse me of town reading mastina in 933 and then claim semantics. You're begging me to vote anywhere else while either a) misrepping my position or b) having a fundamental misconception of the human language.In post 938, Omochao wrote:this devolves into a game of whether not sr means a tr, which is axiomatic and not worth talking about so ill skip this dialogue treeIn post 936, Titus wrote: @O Show me where I say mastina's town. I've been skeptical of Mastina since she claimed.
why do you think mastina is scum in plain english? because she is acting like not (town!mastina)? is scumreading you not allowed here?
Back up where I "changed my mind".
Pleading with me to change while fundamentally misconstruing my position does not work well.
Point blank town mastina can scumread me. Yet, she doesn't swing at me out the gate because she knows my preferred method of playing scum leaves associative if not pushed early. It's been awhile but Iremember her saying it. I'd get proof if I remembered where and had energy.
Then there's self interest as I am usually damn skilled with hoods. Scum mastina parking her suspicion on me with no basis would be an excellent cover for an "accident".
no.In post 951, Nero Cain wrote:Omochao
Do you have any reasoning to think Mastina is town besides not liking the wagon on her?
im not discrediting youIn post 949, Flavor Leaf wrote:That’s just throwing shade at me because I know your slot and that’s on record, so you’re trying to discredit early
so even this debate we're having right now has been planned by mastina lolIn post 947, Nero Cain wrote:b/c she doesn't think she'll get lynched d1
illogical is not analogous to scummy but w/eIn post 964, Nero Cain wrote:and you yourself even admit she's not very townie and are only against the wagon b/c it's "scummy".
its a supposition that she even has that fucking role broTitus wrote: Also, why is there a supposition town has a rolecop?
this is not what it feels like... it felt like this ages agoTitus wrote:This feels like you're mastina's defense attorney....and you don't even TR her.
so you think correct play is "well if theres a cop play so that they don't cop you"? do you think mastina thinks that too?Nero Cain wrote:her role does not affect investigation roles (like a miller and ascetic) and claiming she needed to claim b/c she's an anti-town role is LAMIST and looks more like fishing for town cred than an actual town thought process.
okNero Cain wrote:but I'm the obligatory mod WIFOM role.
ok, I'm willing to admit that scum do throw in roles that are anti-town just to fuck with town but then we get to the part where she felt the need to claim it and nope. The thing is that she's arguing that she's often a scum NK but by claiming she gave herself an excuse for why scum WOULDN'T NK her. All it does (besides giving her an excuse 4 why she isn't dead) is give away extra information and limit the pool of invests/decent PR.
Herto claim wasn't town. Lynch this scumbag.DECISION
you stay stuff like "it feels like you're being mastinas defense attorney"In post 973, Titus wrote:Nero, is that my illness making O make no sense in his gripe to me?
thats cause montosh is scum btwIn post 974, Nero Cain wrote:Montosh is doing some hard fence sitting.
there's scum on both wagons so im a bit past thatNero Cain wrote:and u r ok with being on a wagon with scum?In post 981, Omochao wrote:thats cause montosh is scum btwIn post 974, Nero Cain wrote:Montosh is doing some hard fence sitting.
i didnt shade youIn post 988, Flavor Leaf wrote:He shaded me now I’m not even on his lynch pool
are you just here to memeCreature wrote:Woah, I'm actually being ninja'd.
ftr i always played dark cause shadow looked cool and edgyFlavor Leaf wrote:Yes. The uniquest. You aren’t even a dark or hero chao. You a robot critter.In post 987, Omochao wrote:im probs gonna switch my vote to mastina but im waiting in vain for more ppl to show up and comment on literally anything
arent you so uniqueFlavor Leaf wrote: He is scum.
ftr if i were to concede that it definitely is her role, i would err on the side of her being scum right now. sorta vacillating between scum and town but ive got that last thing that you said in my mind right now so on the side of scum atm.In post 1039, Nero Cain wrote:she's scum that blantantly claimed her role or town that claimed b/c she was worried about claiming in MC
??Nero Cain wrote:b/c she says its her role and she doesn't seem like the gambity type.
Titus wrote:How did you go from hard defending to mastina to she might be lying about her role? Why no vote?
In post 972, Omochao wrote:okNero Cain wrote:but I'm the obligatory mod WIFOM role.
ok, I'm willing to admit that scum do throw in roles that are anti-town just to fuck with town but then we get to the part where she felt the need to claim it and nope. The thing is that she's arguing that she's often a scum NK but by claiming she gave herself an excuse for why scum WOULDN'T NK her. All it does (besides giving her an excuse 4 why she isn't dead) is give away extra information and limit the pool of invests/decent PR.
Herto claim wasn't town. Lynch this scumbag.DECISION
In post 983, Omochao wrote:ftr my current pool of possible scum in no specific order {a50, creature, mastina, titus, montosh, nmsa}
aka half the game
In post 1042, Omochao wrote:sorta vacillating between scum and town but ive got that last thing that you said in my mind right now so on the side of scum atm.
can we like not?
you suckIn post 1118, NotMySpamAccount wrote:Ok let's lynch mastina pls. This is too much. Also, Omochao is scum too, so that's the game solved. Thank me later.
can we stop using equity whenever the fuck we want?In post 1124, Almost50 wrote: This VC tells me Elbrin has highequityof flipping read. Do it's probably Elbrin, CMM & LUV/Creature
notice how none of these synonyms say "probability". tia.google wrote:fairness, fair-mindedness, justness, justice, equitableness, fair play; impartiality, even-handedness, lack of discrimination/bias/prejudice/bigotry, egalitarianism;
honesty, integrity, rightness, rightfulness, rectitude, uprightness, righteousness, properness, decency, goodness, honorableness, scrupulousness, conscientiousness;
reasonableness, sensibleness; value, worth, valuation; ownership, rights, proprietorship
scum has never used a toxicity excuse to policy? lol what?In post 1153, Flavor Leaf wrote:NMSA is town. Those reasonings don’t come from scum. I’ve never seen a scum use that toxic negativity line.
I could be wrong that that’s been said as scum, though
idk why we're even entertaining the idea that he actually cared about "toxicity" after this post that came immediately after butIn post 1134, NotMySpamAccount wrote:In other words, please just lynch her already.
you don't have any reasonsIn post 1169, NotMySpamAccount wrote:guess what people can have multiple reasons for wanting someone lynched.Omochao wrote:idk why we're even entertaining the idea that he actually cared about "toxicity" after this post that came immediately after butIn post 1134, NotMySpamAccount wrote:In other words, please just lynch her already.
like ok
literally whereIn post 1171, NotMySpamAccount wrote:other than mastina being scummy literally from the beginning of the game?
this is literally in the rulesetIn post 1228, rosterfoster wrote:I think it may well be random but we had a message confirming to montosh that I was town.
I think the fact that LUV mentioned that means it is likely that they are town.
mod won't let anyone paste from their medium thread for the same reason ive never seen a mod allow anyone to paste from a neighborhood thread.In post 1245, Almost50 wrote:I think we can wait for roster (a town read) and LUV (originally a scum read) to convey messages from Montosh/Mastina to tell for sure. I think it's hard for either to fake a message from said dead players.
In post 1267, Almost50 wrote:You opposed the lynch that you personally hammered with naked vote??
1259 is a shitpost it has like no meaning at allIn post 923, Omochao wrote:not lynching mastina btw thats some bs right there
everyone here fucking knows what a town pm looks likeIn post 1267, Almost50 wrote:If you had a town role PM you'd understand
if as town i would look at my role pmIn post 1272, Almost50 wrote:Then you agree that it was LAMIST to the max.
no i didntIn post 1272, Almost50 wrote:You lynched/hammered her for no reason. You didn't even say what about her thought process made you change your mind.
no it wasntIn post 1271, Elbirn wrote:Oh good, you've found actual scum. Omochao hammering mastina after several pages defending her was slimy garbage
In post 972, Omochao wrote:okNero Cain wrote:but I'm the obligatory mod WIFOM role.
ok, I'm willing to admit that scum do throw in roles that are anti-town just to fuck with town but then we get to the part where she felt the need to claim it and nope. The thing is that she's arguing that she's often a scum NK but by claiming she gave herself an excuse for why scum WOULDN'T NK her. All it does (besides giving her an excuse 4 why she isn't dead) is give away extra information and limit the pool of invests/decent PR.
Herto claim wasn't town. Lynch this scumbag.DECISION
In post 987, Omochao wrote:im probs gonna switch my vote to mastina but im waiting in vain for more ppl to show up and comment on literally anything
In post 987, Omochao wrote:im probs gonna switch my vote to mastina
In post 987, Omochao wrote:im probs gonna switch my vote to mastina
In post 987, Omochao wrote:im probs gonna switch my vote to mastina
In post 987, Omochao wrote:im probs gonna switch my vote to mastina
In post 987, Omochao wrote:im probs gonna switch my vote to mastina
In post 1042, Omochao wrote:ftr if i were to concede that it definitely is her role, i would err on the side of her being scum right now. sorta vacillating between scum and town but ive got that last thing that you said in my mind right now so on the side of scum atm.In post 1039, Nero Cain wrote:she's scum that blantantly claimed her role or town that claimed b/c she was worried about claiming in MC
In post 1042, Omochao wrote: sorta vacillating between scum and town but ive got that last thing that you said in my mind right now so on the side of scum atm.
In post 972, Omochao wrote:okNero Cain wrote:but I'm the obligatory mod WIFOM role.
ok, I'm willing to admit that scum do throw in roles that are anti-town just to fuck with town but then we get to the part where she felt the need to claim it and nope. The thing is that she's arguing that she's often a scum NK but by claiming she gave herself an excuse for why scum WOULDN'T NK her. All it does (besides giving her an excuse 4 why she isn't dead) is give away extra information and limit the pool of invests/decent PR.
Herto claim wasn't town. Lynch this scumbag.DECISION
In post 1042, Omochao wrote:ive got that last thing that you said in my mind right now so on the side of scum atm.
In post 1042, Omochao wrote:on the side of scum atm.
titus and fl were two people who along with nero and nmsa were the most vocal in lynching mastinaIn post 1272, Almost50 wrote:You may not know mastina's thought process, but I do (and so do Titus and FL to mention a couple more).
you even acknowledge it hereIn post 1198, Almost50 wrote:@Titus: How does leading us off a cliff feel? You insisted on Mastina and now you're after another TR of mine.
yeah i wasnt really thinking of you when i said that i was thinking of titusIn post 1281, Flavor Leaf wrote:I don’t believe i ever once stated that I was voting her because her thought process didn’t line up.
I feel that that’s a misrep.
fuck youIn post 1325, NotMySpamAccount wrote:This is a good point. VOTE: Omochao
i honest to god think nmsa needs to die for yesterday