Mini 598 - Justice Justice - Abandoned

[kabenon007]

/confirm

Well, in that case,

vote:skitzer

. For gits and shiggles.

[kabenon007]

Wowzer, I need some clarification there, in plain english, skruffs. There are a few ways I can view your post, but I would rather you tell me which way you were writing it to be viewed.

[kabenon007]

Explanation feasible, however, I am very wary of traps. Vollkan uses traps. Vollkan equals bad for kabenon007. But I digress.

Traps put one person in too much power for my liking, they set up loaded questions with loaded answers which could mean anything the trapper wishes. They could set a trap where they say, "If X says this, then that means Y" when in reality it might not mean Y, but through logic and flowing language (ala vollkan) they can make it seem like the most plausible, if not the only, solution that the trap could mean.

But, my question was asking him to clarify his words, which he did, so I will not vote, merely giving Skruffs an

IGMEOY

for setting traps.

[kabenon007]

and not bothering to vote of push for the lunch of any of them.

QFH

[kabenon007]

Okay, we really need a lynch, and in effort to avoid a No Lynch, I will

unvote, vote: VanDamien

. I think his play is just plain weird and of the three with the most votes, which is two at the moment, he is the most scummy in my eyes. If I see someone else become scummier or closer to lynch, I will change.

[kabenon007]

Shit, sorry, I completely read that vote count wrong. I thought VD had votes on him. My bad. Unvote, now I have to decide between the three. Alright,

vote: Skruffs

. I had my eye on him earlier anyway.

[kabenon007]

EBWOP:

Unvote, vote:skruffs.

[kabenon007]

Phail, skitzer. You missed the whole post after that where I realized my mistake and voted for skruffs...

[kabenon007]

Unvote, Vote: Angelmouse

What do you mean, Kabenon007, "You had your eye on me earlier" ? That is the most oppurtunistic thing I think I may have ever heard. If you had your eye on me earlier, why didn't you say something earlier? And what about me makes you say you had your eye on me anyways?

I don't know... perhaps it was that IGMEOY that I bolded... and maybe, perhaps even in the same post, I said that IGMEOY because of your trap.

[kabenon007]

Also,

unvote, vote: angelmouse

... deadline to be enacted as soon as Max checks the thread. We need more votes. We can't have ourselves a no lynch.

[kabenon007]

If we kill ZS now, is he dead come Oklahoma morning as well?

[kabenon007]

Hm... okay. I get it. So we just keep him on the back burner for now, because I totally agree that he made a Freudian slip and exposed himself, which is just indecent. Nobody wants to see that.

[kabenon007]

Yeah, what is it with people and not reading the thread? Normally I would see that as a scumtell... so might as well not stop now.

Vote WeyounsLastClone.

[kabenon007]

Also, are we sure that angelmouse isn't dead entirely? Because he is listed as lynched not in the Oklahoma game, but in the general players list, which I take to mean he is out completely.

[kabenon007]

I always find people who don't read the thread suspicious. That is the normally. So I figured "Why change my ways now?" Please go back to voting yourself now.

[kabenon007]

I am going to be missing in action until the 13th. I thought I was going to have internet access where I was going, but it turns out I will not.

[kabenon007]

Ok, I'm back, basically. I'll do a reread, but this game is going to be hard to reread due to the different games. As such, it might take a little bit.

[kabenon007]

This is the game in whick Korts claimed to have vigged ZS, correct? I agree with VanDamien that that is a scummy move to claim it and assume that means he is confirmed, as if he were scum trying to slip under our radars, hoping we would forget that Oklahoma mafia have a one shot vig in Oklahoma instead of a nightkill.

But then if Korts is scum, and he is trying to pass as a town who used his vig, does that mean he used his one shot? I would guess not, and the scum set it up that one would use their one shot and then another would claim it. That is just my hypothesis for that one.

vote: korts

[kabenon007]

I'll continue to use you as an example. Your buddy makes the kill, using his one shot. He is now useless as a scum other than being the informed minority. So, if one scum were to claim the kill, if he did, he would be "confirmed" in the town's mind if the ploy worked. But instead, the scum use the ploy by having you, a scum who has not used their one shot, make the claim, thereby "confirming" a scum with a one shot power instead of " confirming" a scum with no powers at all. That way, the unpowered scum would be more likely to be lynched than the one who claimed a vig kill.

[kabenon007]

Right, but that's only if we believe the claim, and completely let them off the hook.

[kabenon007]

I actually don't get it. You say Korts hasn't used his shot, but is claiming to have done so instead of another scum? Now Korts, who still has his shot left, draws all the attention, possibly getting himself lynched/killed, losing his vig-shot he supposedly has left in the process. Something's fishy here.

What attention? Nobody has really placed that much attention on him. He isn't under that much suspicion. And yes, if the scum who had used their one shot was the one who claimed the kill, then it is more likely they would be left alone and therefore the scums with a one shot left were more likely to be found.

I'm saying if this is a ploy, and Korts is scum, I think he still has his kill left.

[kabenon007]

I actually don't get it. You say Korts hasn't used his shot, but is claiming to have done so instead of another scum? Now Korts, who still has his shot left, draws all the attention, possibly getting himself lynched/killed, losing his vig-shot he supposedly has left in the process. Something's fishy here.

What attention? Nobody has really placed that much attention on him. He isn't under that much suspicion. And yes, if the scum who had used their one shot was the one who claimed the kill, then it is more likely they would be left alone and therefore the scums with a one shot left were more likely to be found.

I'm saying if this is a ploy, and Korts is scum, I think he still has his kill left.

But this is a dumb ploy, because it puts the scum who has a kill left at risk by having him claim and therefore in the spotlight of the town. It wouldn't necessarily get the scum lynched, but with him in the spotlight, any mistakes made would be doubly noted.

Good point, I think WeyounsLastClone also brought this up. I hadn't thought of that before, and it does put an enormous amount of responsibility and risk on that scum's shoulders. But if the player was known to be a good scum under pressure... I don't know. I don't think I believe that plan anymore.

Unvote

[kabenon007]

Yeah, I agree with WLC here. Please explain, lest we think you have knowledge we don't, and are therefore the informed minority.

[kabenon007]

Um, mod, I unvoted Korts in post 282.

[kabenon007]

Likewise, dead in his game, work kicking my ass during the othe game.