Mini 583! BAMPEG!!!....IS THIS THE END???

[dahill1]

/CONFIRMED FOR BAMPEG!!

[dahill1]

Vote Coron

hey Coron!

[dahill1]

Its day one without a night.
If JDodge could have information to know that Scopey is scum at this point the game would be bastardized. And not the good kind of Bastardized, the bad kind

Unless I myself am scum with Scopey. How did you not see that possibility, I wonder? Because you know my alignment already?

Unvote, vote: Tamuz

unvote, vote Tamuz

seems like a slip to me

[dahill1]

Its day one without a night.
If JDodge could have information to know that Scopey is scum at this point the game would be bastardized. And not the good kind of Bastardized, the bad kind

Unless I myself am scum with Scopey. How did you not see that possibility, I wonder? Because you know my alignment already?

Unvote, vote: Tamuz

to me, this post (by Tamuz) seemed like a small slip
it's not much of a tell but its all i pretty much have to go on at this point

[dahill1]

unvote vote dizzyizzyb13

just testin ya

[dahill1]

i think most votes and reasoning at the moment are completely meaningless and superficial.

are you serious?

vote roffman

because this vote is meaningless and superficial[/b]

[dahill1]

My vote also is not meaningless.

But WhoMe is a poor lynch for today. I need a while longer to understand if this is classic WhoMe play or actual scumminess. roffman, on the other hand, definite scum.

so far this seems to me like what WhoMe normally is like

[dahill1]

ongoing game

[dahill1]

Defending yourself is not a scum tell. There is no such thing as being overdefensive. I do not support the WhoMe wagon.

well it looks like we have all 3 scum
today we should lynch roffman, then decide about who goes next

[dahill1]

Unvote, vote: dahill

I don't recall it saying anywhere that there is 3 scum...

i assumed there was because that is the norm in all of the games i've played so far

[dahill1]

the secret is out!

[dahill1]

Why is it exactly that we want to grill Erg0 in the first place

yeah i'm not against it, but i don't see the point in it when we already have 2 possible lynch candidates

[dahill1]

vote kaleidoscop

i'm around 90% certain that ergo isn't scum.

why?

[dahill1]

i'm here
still down for a roffman lynch

[dahill1]

unvote

whome, is there any particular reason you chose me besides the other people on the roffman wagon?

[dahill1]

they could have been scum-buddies?

[dahill1]

they could have been scum-buddies?

sorry, who could? roffman and Erg or roffman and Kaleidoscope?

Regardless, I'm not saying that a soft claim makes him sacrosanct, but he was already clsoe to lynch, and saying you still want him lynched is scummy. Before lynching a soft claim surely you would press for a full claim first? In this particualr instance where I haven't seen a case against roffman much at all, then I think we would be best served applying pressure elsewhere. You look like a good direction for that pressure to me at the moment.

roffman and ergo
as for the claiming, my thinking is that one always should claim at L-1. sorry if i didn't imply this but of course i still wanted a claim before we lynched him

[dahill1]

well i voted dizzy mainly because he said "next person to vote me dies" which was pretty damn scummy. i voted roffman because he said the D1 votes were meaningless. and as for the "3 scum" comment, you previously said it wasn't much of a tell, now you're saying it could show possible inside info? hmm..
i don't really strongly believe you and roffman are scumbuddies, but whome said it was scummy that i pushed the roffman BW after he said "i'm 90% ergo isn't scum"
everyone just seemed to believe that but i found no reason why i should particularly

[dahill1]

If this is usual behavior for Kaleidoscope, then I do prefer dahill as a lynch

unvote, revote dahill

so you disagree with kscope, but you revote me just because he's usually like this?

vote WhoMe

Vote: Dahill

I still see no solid reason for a whome? lynch. Dahill, on the other hand, is by far much better...

can you explain why?

[dahill1]

also Erg0, you did pretty much the same thing for the roffman wagon that you are accusing me of for the dizzy wagon. i was 3rd to vote for dizzy and "following JD" apparently. you were 3rd to vote roffman after it was gaining momentum, and JD also happened to start that wagon

[dahill1]

we're getting close to deadline and i for one would rather see dahill die than whome. therefore:

unvote vote Dahill1

to tie them up again.

why?

[dahill1]

unvote

any counterclaims?

[dahill1]

i'm vanilla
the flavor is a band called High Five Hardcore. one of their songs states that i keep to myself, so i have no special powers

[dahill1]

atm, i'm happy with lynching dahill. Personally, i don't really mind lynching a vanilla, and if he is not what he claims, then we got ourselves a scum. I also don't think anyone could build a case against anyone else in the time remaining.

so you're saying you don't mind lynching me even if i'm a townie? and you're too lazy to analyze anyone else?

[dahill1]

Deadline is later today. You are the only option to be lynched right now. If you are a townie, then at least we didn't lynch a powerrole.

well in that case

vote extension of deadline

[dahill1]

i'm vanilla
the flavor is a band called High Five Hardcore. one of their songs states that i keep to myself, so i have no special powers

This is kind of weird, flavour-wise. The two dead players have mafiascum users as flavour, and you have a band?

i wasn't suprised at all actually because i know PEG likes these kinds of bands. also, both people who had MS users were both powerroles

[dahill1]

i enjoyed the fact that Tamuz's role was Shit