VOTE: TwoFace
That post reads like a confession, Harvey.
VOTE: TwoFace
Mr. Nigma is an eccentric.In post 12, TwoFace wrote:I'm not psycho. I'm eccentric
*flips coin*In post 17, TwoFace wrote:Still not a psycho thoughIn post 15, -Grey- wrote:Mr. Nigma is an eccentric.In post 12, TwoFace wrote:I'm not psycho. I'm eccentric
You are a zealot.
It is, indeed. One might wonder why Dave would be interested in avoiding being on a wagon.
100 was forced.In post 105, TwoFace wrote:why jar?
What did you hope to accomplish with that question?In post 138, gerryoat wrote:If you read someone saying you were scummy, how do you not know who said it?In post 137, keyenpeydee wrote:Why am I scummy? @whoeversaidthat
Fixed for accuracy.In post 141, gerryoat wrote:It looks like lazy to me. I mean it's not like it's been 20 pages, it's been 6. He could have asked directly, but instead it looked like he was trying to avoid effortIn post 140, -Grey- wrote:What did you hope to accomplish with that question?In post 138, gerryoat wrote:If you read someone saying you were scummy, how do you not know who said it?In post 137, keyenpeydee wrote:Why am I scummy? @whoeversaidthat
It's Gamma.In post 268, JarJarDrinks wrote:Is this really ur defense?In post 267, Gamma Emerald wrote:My earlier reads were half assed
Simply unvoting instead of finding a new home for your vote looks scummy as fuck.In post 286, PsychoticDave wrote:The random voting thing is a meme. I always unvote memes.
Why not?In post 354, Gamma Emerald wrote:Tywin's focus on TF doesn't feel right to me.
If he is too concerned about TF's association, why would he draw even more attention to it the way he has been?In post 356, Gamma Emerald wrote:It feels like he's too concerned about TF's associationIn post 355, -Grey- wrote:Why not?In post 354, Gamma Emerald wrote:Tywin's focus on TF doesn't feel right to me.
Maybe scum caught for the wrong reason
So... why aren't you voting him?In post 359, Gamma Emerald wrote:This does not look like a town post. It looks like scum trying to discredit/pre-defend.
Are you reading the same game I am? No way is Gamma scum in this game.In post 429, JarJarDrinks wrote:well he's probably scum also. I can only vote 1 scumread @ a time.
How about the fact it's superficial and lacks any actual scum motivation?In post 434, JarJarDrinks wrote:Please point out a flaw in my case.In post 432, -Grey- wrote:Are you reading the same game I am? No way is Gamma scum in this game.In post 429, JarJarDrinks wrote:well he's probably scum also. I can only vote 1 scumread @ a time.
I mean seriously, whoIn post 435, -Grey- wrote:How about the fact it's superficial and lacks any actual scum motivation?In post 434, JarJarDrinks wrote:Please point out a flaw in my case.In post 432, -Grey- wrote:Are you reading the same game I am? No way is Gamma scum in this game.In post 429, JarJarDrinks wrote:well he's probably scum also. I can only vote 1 scumread @ a time.
That's a stupid question to be asking on day one because the only people that can answer it with any accuracy at all are scum.In post 437, JarJarDrinks wrote:who's scum grey?
Yeah. Those are exactly the words that came out of my mouth. Because not liking stupidity means... embracing... stupidity?In post 443, JarJarDrinks wrote:So we should be voting randomly? Or do you want to no-lynch?In post 441, -Grey- wrote:That's a stupid question to be asking on day one because the only people that can answer it with any accuracy at all are scum.In post 437, JarJarDrinks wrote:who's scum grey?
I hate day one in games because people latch onto the stupidest excuses to vote someone.
In post 447, -Grey- wrote:Yeah. Those are exactly the words that came out of my mouth. Because not liking stupidity means... embracing... stupidity?In post 443, JarJarDrinks wrote:So we should be voting randomly? Or do you want to no-lynch?In post 441, -Grey- wrote:That's a stupid question to be asking on day one because the only people that can answer it with any accuracy at all are scum.In post 437, JarJarDrinks wrote:who's scum grey?
I hate day one in games because people latch onto the stupidest excuses to vote someone.
Frankly, I think it would be better to townhunt on day one, and vote outside of the townreads.
That increases the odds of straight random voting, which is better than a typical d1 lynch that has a high chance of being scum driven.
Then d2 can focus more on how those townreads came about and whether they were justified based on their own posts as well as vc activity and the like.
d1 is easier to find townreads than legitimate scumreads, so town should use that.
Feel free to sheep Gamma. That's where my vote is.In post 451, Raskolnikov wrote:You can't put no input in what goes on and then complain at the result though. If you think gamma is a bad wagon you should offer alternatives.
Nah I was asking for Gamma to clarify an apparent contradiction.In post 465, TwoFace wrote:nah he was sort of defending himIn post 461, JarJarDrinks wrote:Go back and read page 15.
Like am I crazy or was grey defending tywin right before he voted for him?
inb4 we're scum together and so intimidated by Tywin that we're blatantly hanging up on him.In post 469, Gamma Emerald wrote:Go on, say what you're thinking.
There's the summary of your beef with me, which is a lovely misrep.In post 472, Tywin Lannister wrote:that apparently -grey- finds to be an amazing case.
Who says I know you?In post 475, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also, I'm not oblivious. I can see what Grey is doing and I don't really mind, though I'd like to know how he knows me.
Dude. You have a playstyle that I identify with. That's why I read you town. That's why I ask you for clarification on your reads when I don't 'get it'.In post 478, Gamma Emerald wrote:This post.In post 269, -Grey- wrote:It's Gamma.In post 268, JarJarDrinks wrote:Is this really ur defense?In post 267, Gamma Emerald wrote:My earlier reads were half assed
I buy it.
Assumptions like that are why it's important to actually all clarifying questions and pull your head out of your ass.In post 480, JarJarDrinks wrote:Um WHAT?
"It's Gamma, I buy it" CLEARLY is an implication that you're familiar with Gamma. Not that it's a playstyle u "identify with"
He's not a townread.In post 483, JarJarDrinks wrote:Grey, any read on keyen?
Why? Because I don't confirm to your cookie cutter mold of what town should look like?In post 482, JarJarDrinks wrote:grey is REALLY looking like scum now.
The fact you think you pegged three scum on day one is EXACTLY the problem I have with scumhunting on day one.
No Einstein.In post 487, Tywin Lannister wrote:Your scum motive is to win by getting townies lynched while you survive. Am I doing this right?In post 486, -Grey- wrote:Why? Because I don't confirm to your cookie cutter mold of what town should look like?In post 482, JarJarDrinks wrote:grey is REALLY looking like scum now.
Explain what my scum motive is.
Only if you're being honest about that actually being the reason.In post 489, JarJarDrinks wrote:Why do I need you to have a scum motive. I townread tywin so isn't that a good enough reason for me to sheep him?In post 486, -Grey- wrote:Explain what my scum motive is.
How did the wagon on this clown fall apart?In post 489, JarJarDrinks wrote:Why do I need you to have a scum motive.
You were pushing me. Ergo, you believe I have scum motive in my posts.In post 497, JarJarDrinks wrote:he just called me stupid so he deserves to be mockedIn post 491, Gamma Emerald wrote:Ah yes, mocking someone's play style, the towniest actionIn post 489, JarJarDrinks wrote:Why do I need you to have a scum motive. I townread tywin so isn't that a good enough reason for me to sheep him?In post 486, -Grey- wrote:Explain what my scum motive is.
And it's not really mocking. He wants me to explain his scum motivation because I'm voting for him but he's voting for tywin for literally no reason.
Ever since you lied about sheeping Tywin they have. Keep up, champ.In post 501, JarJarDrinks wrote:wait you scumream me now? Your last bunch of posts don't read to me like you're talking to someone u believe is scum.In post 498, -Grey- wrote:How did the wagon on this clown fall apart?
498In post 503, JarJarDrinks wrote:Like how do you ask how the wagon on me fell apart when you're not voting for me, not trying to push my lynch, not doing anything to try to get people to lynch me.
In post 504, JarJarDrinks wrote:It wasn't a lie. It was using your own argument against you. Even Gamma pointed out how I shouldn't have been mocking you.In post 502, -Grey- wrote:Ever since you lied about sheeping Tywin they have. Keep up, champ.
No. He pushed me. He called me scum. I asked for scum motive. He couldn't provide it, so he claimed to be sheeping.In post 512, Raskolnikov wrote:VOTE: Grey
Jarjar used your own logic to illustrate how little sense it made and you're taking that at face value as a lie.
I doubt you actually fail to see the connection so I think you're being extremely disingenuous here.
And he STILL HASN'T provided any actual reason to read me as scum.In post 514, Raskolnikov wrote:He was clearly mocking you in that context when he said it was sheeping.
He mistook me for an easy target that would go down quietly because I wasn't active due to my distaste of d1s.In post 521, Raskolnikov wrote:So what's his scum motivation?
That post makes no sense. If you think I'm lying, why wouldn't you vote me?In post 588, TwoFace wrote:I agree, but we aren't lynching him regardless.In post 585, PsychoticDave wrote:Claiming a protective is an overused tactic.
i don't believe the claim either fwiw
By design.In post 593, Raskolnikov wrote:Claim was a little early.