let me guess, you're one, right?In post 49, CCC wrote:Three mafia sounds about right to me.
VOTE: CCC
let me guess, you're one, right?In post 49, CCC wrote:Three mafia sounds about right to me.
tip: i vote the first non-townread post above mineIn post 125, The_Jester wrote:@SquareWorld I'd like to see some reads from you.
lolIn post 187, gerryoat wrote:@Gren
I fos RhazhBash , hence the vote. I think you have had townie lines like i've explained. I don't see the rush in making reads when we aren't even 10 pages in yet. But, I'd be confident lynching RhazhBash the most right now
townIn post 145, Grendel wrote:How much scummier is Box World compared to Pokémon Remake Emerald, and Old Man Victor?In post 121, CCC wrote:
In my previous post, I suggested that VictorDeAngelo and Gamma Emerald were pinging as very slightly scum. To that list I will now add GreenNope and Square World; the first for being completely absent, and the second for providing extremely short posts with no reasons for his votes. From these four, I will elect to park my vote (for the moment) on:
VOTE: Square World
Also, stop self-metaing at the drop of a hat.
do you wanna play Scum Crush Saga?In post 233, eagerSnake wrote:Manuel87 seems like a good place to end our game, don't you think?
noIn post 238, eagerSnake wrote:@Square World can you explain your reads in a bit more detail?
simple, you aren't trying to discern his alignmentIn post 242, eagerSnake wrote:VOTE: Square World
Well I'm not going to allow an environment where scum can active lurk and post just short of prodges and not have to explain anything. We already have enough of that going on.
real lifeIn post 249, VictorDeAngelo wrote:@SquareWorld- Why have you gone from posting nothing to suddenly spamming the thread?
calm down, i dont get a read on everyone within 2 daysAnd on another note why not a direct response to 229. Should I infer Gerry and Manual are your only scumreads?
lol there are moreIn post 254, Manuel87 wrote:While i think he has a valid point that its not really an analysis but rather a summary of what said player posted that game, i dont understand why he only refers to the RhazhBash analysis and not to the ones on Victor and Gerry.
maybe you have to learn to see the post i quotedIn post 254, Manuel87 wrote:@Square: Why do you think Gerry is scum?
isn't the quote auto-explainable there?In post 236, Square World wrote:lolIn post 187, gerryoat wrote:@Gren
I fos RhazhBash , hence the vote. I think you have had townie lines like i've explained. I don't see the rush in making reads when we aren't even 10 pages in yet. But, I'd be confident lynching RhazhBash the most right now
VOTE: gerryoat
In post 284, CCC wrote:so I'll expect to see his more complete reads list fairly soon.
In post 437, frog wrote:Creature's early posts don't really contribute much of substance. If the game needs more 'spice', as they claim, it would be lovely if they were to introduce that. Random reads with no explanations, an unwillingness to explain any of them at all on post #108, followed by a deflection towards the inactives in #130. If he is, as he claims, a man of few words, this makes sense. I might read a previous game or two to get a better read.
I like JaeReed's first few posts, although as others have pointed out the reaction tests had been exposed well before he entered the game properly. Engages well to make up for the relative lateness, and asks perceptive questions. This continues for the rest of the game up to this point. Leaning town.
I don't like the way Parama enters the game. Maybe that's just because their first few posts look far too serious for the RVS/immediately post-RVS stage, and their serious interpretation of posts made early in the game, but something about it rubs me up the wrong way. Remark on post #141 is particularly annoying ('why do you care about jaereed's post 8 townreads') since they're happy enough to read into something as early as post #2. Reading later into the game, however, I'm beginning to like the content of their posts a little more, if not their tone.
Dunnstral I'm null-leaning-town on. Early game comments are useful, but then there's a fairly confusing mess about misinterpretations with KittenLicks later on. This reads as town on town to me, not least because they both seem to be working in the same direction and some of the disagreement is about theory rather than just comments. Later posts clear up confusion and serve to focus the conversation where it might otherwise have gone somewhere less promising.
BDT6_Maker we have almost nothing on. Half of their posts are excuses for not posting. I don't like this. Seconding calls for a replacement if they can't give the game the attention it deserves. I don't like post #325, however. Nothing about the post he's quoting demands a response calling attention to roles.
GreyIce and thenewearth are both recent entrants and I have little on them as of right now, although I'm not a fan of the latter's attacks on KittenLicks. P-EDIT: really not a fan.
I'm not all that convinced by the case on Kitten. The discussion of the circle mechanic is null, especially since it occupied other players such as Dunnstral and Creature, the former of whom doesn't appear in thenewearth's suspect list. I don't think post #26 is rolefishing either, since Kitten attempted to shut down discussion before (and does it again in this post). If anything, this exchange just reflects badly on GuiltyLion, who not only keeps asking about something it's clear might be damaging, but then goes on to talk about potential PR claims in post #23, which is far more rolefish-y. I generally like Kitten's posts, so I'm leaning town here too.
I do, however, agree with Dunnstral's assessment of Clumsy Phoenix's early posts. Post #45 is a little scummy; it seems needlessly preoccupied, given there's only a couple of votes on Clumsy Phoenix, with proving their own innocence, and it isn't actually doing anything. It takes until post #81 for them to start being proactive (and even then there's a reference to them being not scum), and then in their next post, #83, we return to the introspection. Incidentally, the first time I read the whole 'any response I make will look scummy' thing, I thought it could be frustrated town, but the reiteration in their most recent post gives me the opposite impression.
Here's the problem with your statement: you're not playing to it. I agree with the sentiment, explaining yourself clearly and moving on is a good thing to do, but you keep returning to the issue (and there have been several issues) all the while reminding us of what you're (not) doing and how it's actually town behaviour (or, at least, how any behaviour you could engage in is scummy, so you're not scum).
Unvote
Vote: Clumsy Phoenix
There was unsurprisingly a lot to read, so if anyone wants clarification or more detail, just ask.
In post 235, Square World wrote:rhazhbash is probtown because there are opportunistic scum on him
In post 236, Square World wrote:lolIn post 187, gerryoat wrote:@Gren
I fos RhazhBash , hence the vote. I think you have had townie lines like i've explained. I don't see the rush in making reads when we aren't even 10 pages in yet. But, I'd be confident lynching RhazhBash the most right now
VOTE: gerryoat
rhazh is lynchbaity, wouldn't be surprised if there were scum on himIn post 291, CCC wrote:Okay,In post 283, Square World wrote:he's being opportunistic
Opportunism is the conscious policy and practice of taking advantage of circumstances – with little regard for principles, or with what the consequences are for others. Opportunist actions are expedient actions guided primarily by self-interested motives. The term can be applied to individual humans and living organisms, groups, organizations, styles, behaviours, and trends.howis he being opportunistic?
In post 750, Huntress wrote:My read on eager is mainly a gut read but I'll try to pin it down a bit.
Eager's posting felt off from his very first post. Most people who want to do something other than rvs to start discussion just do it. Eager made a point of drawing the players attention to what he was doing. He was too quick to call Gamma town in 70, especially in view of his statement that he starts with the assumption that everyone is guilty until proved innocent. I didn't like the second part of 80. If he thought Victor might be town with an ulterior motive then he should have waited to see what came of it rather than point it out. Either way it would have been better to wait for Victor's explanation first. His vote on Square in 600 was for an extremely flimsy reason. It was also for something that Manuel did, not Square. He's throwing the words "doubtcasting" and "WIFOM" around far too much and adding distracting stuff like 697.
Vote: eagerSnake