Open 27- Bird C9 (Game over!) before 466
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
- I don't like how enlightened bystander placed a second vote, but I wouldn't mind giving some leeway since I think enlightened bystander is a newbie.
- I also find it odd that EB places fernando on his los, when he was also guilty of being away.
- Barmacal: I'm stepping in to defend barmacal more-or-less based on the same logic. He's a townperson (I mean the note under his username). Remarking about random voting seems pretty normal. I don't like how he bowed down to pressure, so I'm keeping a look out in future, but my verdict is not scummy for that scum-tell for now.
- About Fernando: The main case against him is lurking. He isn't the only one, myself included.Blank.-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
Ryan:
Possibly the most notable issue is him going after Barmacral for random voting. His stated reason for the vote is for pressure. I'm pretty okay with this vote.
I don't like his 3rd post, where he 'frames' Barm --> says Barm is not intersted in scum hunting. Barm's original post says he doesn't think random voting furthers the game, and nowhere does he imply he's disinterested in scum hunting. In a twisted sense, I could argue the reverse, that Barm thinks because random voting is useless, we should get right down to scumhunting, ie, implying he wants to find out who is scum.
Post 4 shows ryan attacking Barm for contradiciting himself by random voting after saying he wasn't going to random vote. He was the first one to point this out, so this is plus points for ryan.
Post 7 confirms ryan thinks Barm is scum. This is consistent. I'll address Tarh later. He pokes inactive people, and followes up with a vote on fernando (said inactive).
He swings pretty much back and forth between barm and Fernando this game, with solid reasons. I see nothing wrong in his play.Blank.-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
I don't see a case for ryan before TCS posted.
However, I see some weird interaction going on.
TCS posts, baits ryan to vote.
Ryan immediately follows with a vote on Tar.
If anyone reads through ryan's posts, you'll notice that most of his posts show suspicion on Fern instead.
Hence, if we buy the 'I'd be fine with voting for tar or fernando', why choose tarh?Blank.-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
Let's look at ryan's response.ryan wrote:I know I'm town and have watched both of them try and place a case on me for awhile now with sketchy reasons at best. Tar's reasoning for voting me were pathetic and made it an easy vote to place on him. Either or is scum, and if you don't believe me, investigate me, I'm here to out the scum.
1. I know I'm town. O_o.
2. Investigate me.
3. It was easy to vote for Tar.
My first reaction was 2 = godfather, but this is an open game without one.
3 sounds like opportunistic voting. But then again, tar's vote was as opportunistic.
Couple of things before I vote: check out TCS. At this point, I'm leaning on TCS / mokina being pro-town, but I'll have another look. Also, I think tarhalindur and ryan both look scummy...Blank.-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
Since you are way too lazy...
I made another post earlier about ryan. Go look it up.spectrumvoid wrote:
Let's look at ryan's response.ryan wrote:I know I'm town and have watched both of them try and place a case on me for awhile now with sketchy reasons at best. Tar's reasoning for voting me were pathetic and made it an easy vote to place on him. Either or is scum, and if you don't believe me, investigate me, I'm here to out the scum.
1. I know I'm town. O_o.
2. Investigate me.
3. It was easy to vote for Tar.
My first reaction was 2 = godfather, but this is an open game without one.
3 sounds like opportunistic voting. But then again, tar's vote was as opportunistic.
Couple of things before I vote: check out TCS. At this point, I'm leaning on TCS / mokina being pro-town, but I'll have another look. Also, I think tarhalindur and ryan both look scummy...Blank.-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
Major attitude change: After a reread, because I've been inactive, I have now decided that I don't think ryan is scummy. I also do not think that TCS is scummy. As such, I will be voting tarha tomorrow.
(I have really bad internet connection because of school, I'll figure out a way tomorrow, post from library or something. If it gets really bad, I'll ask for replacement.)Blank.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.