In post 17, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 14, PeaceBringer wrote:
This is scummy. Covering his eyes with glasses so we don't read the scum in them.
you going to be town this time?
In post 17, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 14, PeaceBringer wrote:
This is scummy. Covering his eyes with glasses so we don't read the scum in them.
In post 22, Scarab wrote:PeaceBringer is my strongest town read atm, but you can redeem yourself by voting Skold with me.In post 17, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 14, PeaceBringer wrote:
This is scummy. Covering his eyes with glasses so we don't read the scum in them.
Unvote: ABR
Vote: Skold
becauseOMGUShe had to have noticed BBT's existence in the game before he saw my post and I think the fact that his message to BBT was posted after his vote for me was to draw attention away from the vote
In post 85, Scarab wrote:Unvote: Skold
Vote: Prolapsed Brain
Skold wagon is kinda bad. Juls wagon is very bad. This post is just asking for rope
In post 86, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Why is Skold wagon bad?
In post 130, Clusk92 wrote:In post 117, PeaceBringer wrote:
concerning- anyone can hae genuine reads and how would you know if thoughts and reads are genuine or not. That post is 1000 times a load of crap
Wow, that's quite the stretch isn't it?
Why are you voting for Juls?
Atm you and PB are going on my scumpile.
In post 130, Clusk92 wrote:In post 117, PeaceBringer wrote:
concerning- anyone can hae genuine reads and how would you know if thoughts and reads are genuine or not. That post is 1000 times a load of crap
Wow, that's quite the stretch isn't it?
Why are you voting for Juls?
Atm you and PB are going on my scumpile.
In post 136, Skold wrote:In post 117, PeaceBringer wrote:
concerning- anyone can hae genuine reads and how would you know if thoughts and reads are genuine or not. That post is 1000 times a load of crap
This post is bad. It's takes Clusk's post out of context by far and away. Scum read behind Juls.
In post 135, Garmr wrote:In post 134, PeaceBringer wrote:but looking back over, juls is rather new it seems-
so actually more low hanging fruit...
unvote
Juls has 1 and a half pages under her belt (this is taking away all the other stuff she posts on) ;/ I think that it's safe to say she does have enough experience.
In post 139, Clusk92 wrote:In post 137, PeaceBringer wrote:In post 136, Skold wrote:In post 117, PeaceBringer wrote:
concerning- anyone can hae genuine reads and how would you know if thoughts and reads are genuine or not. That post is 1000 times a load of crap
This post is bad. It's takes Clusk's post out of context by far and away. Scum read behind Juls.
lol, naw, skold, it is my general take on crappy statements like that... it was what he said. There is nothing out of context...
so why is noob juls a scum read for you skold?
Why is asking someone a question to get them involved in the game a crappy statement? You are trying to make something out of nothing at the moment which is what scum love to do.
In post 140, Clusk92 wrote:In post 132, PeaceBringer wrote:In post 130, Clusk92 wrote:In post 117, PeaceBringer wrote:
concerning- anyone can hae genuine reads and how would you know if thoughts and reads are genuine or not. That post is 1000 times a load of crap
Wow, that's quite the stretch isn't it?
Why are you voting for Juls?
Atm you and PB are going on my scumpile.
for what, for calling you full of crap... skold is low hanging fruit, Juls jumped on the low hanging fruit to the point of trying to push it to a wagon... it was the one skold vote that stood out beside your nonsense... and your stuff is likely just nonsense...
How do you know Skold is low hanging fruit and not actually scum?
In post 144, Clusk92 wrote:You know I meant geniune in this context as in serious thoughts, because he was joking and not being serious in every post. Stop being so pedantic.
In post 148, Zoronos wrote:Ummm... telling someone to play serious when they're just joking around isn't scummy. If anything ending joke-phase early leans slightly townie, imo. The only thing I saw even possibly scummy about that post is that the phrasing 'genuine opinions' is pejorative (since it presumes non-genuine opinions), but it wasn't followed up with a credibility attack and was specifically directed at joke posting.
So yeah, doesn't seem scummy to me.
In post 150, Zoronos wrote:So, what did you learn?
You wrote a bunch of stuff calling a post, "awful", "Stupid" or "a load of crap". You went to effort to belabor how much you dislike that post.
In post 152, Skold wrote:Just because you didn't vote/scumread him doesn't mean your silly attack won't come under scrutiny.
VOTE: PeaceBringer
The attack was weird, the defense is awkward.
In post 155, Zoronos wrote:Peace, what in Clusk's response specifically said Town to you?
In post 159, Scarab wrote:Do you still automatically hammer anyone who reaches L-1?
In post 165, Juls wrote:Well Sotty thought the same thing. She's been around longer than I have but we make no excuses. We are just mere women. You know, stupid and stuff.
In post 167, Juls wrote:In post 96, Sotty7 wrote:
In post 79, Juls wrote:OK...sorry I was thinking IC in terms of newbie games and was confused as hell.
I was actually thinking the same thing.
In post 169, Juls wrote:@Peacebringer - Can you please explain the following sequence of events for me:
1) vote for Juls (no reason)
2) unvote Juls (cause low hanging fruit?)
3) made aware that I have been around awhile
4) doesn't return vote to Juls
In post 172, Juls wrote:I often naked vote early to gauge reaction. I blatantly hopped on the wagon. No apologies about that.
every one does... no mystery, you claiming otherwise... you spock or data like?In post 174, Prolapsed Brain wrote:In post 165, Juls wrote:I just like ABR and didn't really want to jump on that wagon.
Wait -- are you seriously saying that you allow your personal feelings toward fellow players to influence your gameplay?
Seriously?
In post 184, Juls wrote:Because I have played/modded a lot more newbie games than I have played with Innocent Children. IC to me is and always will be Inexperienced Challenged. Also that exchange happened over the course of like 10 minutes, not days. I was real-time trying to figure out what she was talking about. It made sense once I realized what she meant.
In post 237, Sotty7 wrote:Peacebringer is likely town. He's been scum hunting. His vote on me is just wrong, but that doesn't make him scum.
In post 244, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:129 - Clusk, why was the Juls wagon terrible and the Skold wagon not? What were the differences?
134 - Peace, Juls has a 2008 join date...how is she classified as 'new'?
In post 248, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I don't get how the comment on Juls relates to the vote on Prolapsed.
In post 251, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:238/241 - This doesn't make sense Peace... You're voting Sotty, she makes a statement that makes you even more uncomfortable and you follow this with an unvote...what?
In post 269, Sotty7 wrote:I'm sad about this too. It did happen awhile ago now, I think you can step out of your bereavement stage now.
In post 264, Scarab wrote:In post 240, Zoronos wrote:I'm not disposed to lynching Sotty or Scarab right now. (Scarab's emotional / frustrated reaction to Garmr felt very genuine, and I don't see a good scum strategy there).I don't like this. Using my emotional response to Garmr to call me town on the basis that he "doesn't see a good scum strategy there" reeks of ascribing motivation based on knowing my alignment. Or...let me put that another way: I think looking at emotion and thinking "that looks genuine" makes sense, but looking at emotion that looks genuine and thinking "hmmm...what scum strategy might there be for this?" seems a bit ridiculous and I don't think that's something someone would be likely to post if they actually thought about why I did what I did.Vote: Zoronos
In post 348, Scarab wrote:I dreamt that Axxle is scum.
In post 430, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Why is this game so slow?
In post 438, Skold wrote:So voting without any reason isn't a scumtell? Okay.
In post 438, Skold wrote:And what about his conditions for voting me? Or his self-admission of not being serious?
In post 441, Skold wrote:You know what I meant. Or at least should have. But I'll clarify -
Has not presented reasons for scumreading me.
Has presented conditions for voting me.
In post 448, RedCoyote wrote:Ugh... this game is going to stagnate. I have nothing new to say that hasn't been said. I also don't think it's fair to the town to be held to the deadline with two vacant slots.
This is WIFOM, but I'm going to say it anyway. As scum I wouldn't bring this point up and hope the mod would just push forward. But I need to officially request that the mod suspends the deadline until both slots are filled.