Man we are on top of these prods. This is neat.
SO I'M SICK AND GRUMPY. Let's see what kind of bullshit we can find to abuse.
In post 380, Count Dooku wrote:Oh wow. Nickname replaces out?!
He was my strongest scumread. Now I am sure that he is scum, who tried to run away, after getting some pressure.
VOTE: Nickname
This is ridiculous. People replace out. Maybe he had IRL shit. Maybe he couldn't keep up with the game. Maybe all of my swearing was grating to his delicate eyeholes. This vote is arrogant and stupid.
In post 381, bji wrote:I'm liking JohnnyFarrar less and less every day. He seems to like to stir things up but doesn't look to be working in any coherent direction or really trying to scum hunt with any sense of urgency. That's just how it looks right now.
Oh sorry, am I supposed to have a concrete game plan on day 1? Or is there some information I should have?
You should like tell me why. For both of those. Because this post made me stop liking you all at once.
In post 386, West9 wrote:I would vote bji, but this wagon has merit and seems like it'll be really fun to analyze tomorrow. VOTE: Nickname
Gross. You saw he was replacing out, right?
In post 391, bji wrote:I believe that I've made longer and stronger efforts at applying consistent pressure to pisskop than Johnny did, but I will admit that my technique is poor. If Johnny is going to dismiss me and my viewpoints because I am a newbie, doesn't that mean that I get to criticize Johnny for not getting more results as an experienced player?
I call this the "You're better than this" fallacy, and it's made quite a few of the best people I've ever played with decide to stop playing. This game is complicated, and only gets more complicated as the players get better. It's not fair to expect someone to reliably and consistently get good results in such a deep and open ended game. Especially on day one.
In post 397, Count Dooku wrote:
Post
53. The only thing stood for him is your behavior. Nothing else. It is not a big problem by itself, but:
Post
93. He doesn’t talk about bji anymore. He puts back pisskop to L-1 on purpose. But doesn’t state any reasons. Just jumps on the biggest wagon, and tells us that he doesn’t have time to tell us those reasons (maybe because he was hoping for a hammer?). And remember initially he found bji scummy (or interesting) and not pisskop. But now, he votes pisskop.
Post
114. „I am bad at mafia”-card. I hate it. When he does something scummy, and poeple impeach him, he can just say „Oh, sorry I am town, who is bad at mafia”.
Post
153. After the attention was drawn to Lapsa, he votes him, and he doesn’t say anything original, just states things about Lapsa that already have been stated by others.
So very little content given, and he did only scummy things.
And now he is running away, after he got some pressure.
I'm not denying that any of this could be true. But listen. You're finding the explanation for his behavior that fits you perception of him while ignoring other really believable options. For instance: He's a new and young player who doesn't really know what he's doing and barely knows how to follow along so he just goes with the crowd every time he posts.