It seems to me that peter keeps turning the tables and always seems to take your discussions the wrong way.CrashTextDummie wrote:Here's what he said. Complete quote:DeathSauce wrote:Did you read the posts in question? They specifically refer to the "CTD/Peter contingent".
"Good, Peter has been running this game, i'm surprised nobody else has noticed that, if it takes lynching me to realize that, then i'll be happy to be of service. "
Nowhere does he mention me.
He followed this up with more attacks on Peter.Noneon me.
He even quoted you again later:
Again, he specifically, and only comments on the Peter part of your argument.pickemgenius wrote:Wait, I wasn't the first to say Peter was running the game?Deathsauce wrote:1) I felt that the amount of suspicion leveled at VRK was inconsistent with the seriousness of his mistake. I actually still don't understand why it was such a big deal.
2)Seeing Peter Venkman, who was the voice of reason throughout the first 18 pages, suddenly glom onto this trivial matter as if it was the scumtell of all time really raised my hackles.
3) This sentencewas odd. We had a deadline fast approaching, there was no danger that someone wasn't going to be lynched.CTD wrote: It's clearly better in this situation to lynch someone, so please get your act together, town.
Why was CTD so anxious for everyone to jump on the VRK wagon? To lessen the importance of his vote?
Maybe.
This does notat alltranslate into him being so sure that I am scum that he would sacrifice himself. It does not even translate into him being suspicious of me. About the only thing he ever said about me is that he felt my argument against VRK is weak.
I don't know why I'm even bothering with you anymore.I take it, by the way, that you do now admit that the incident occurred? If so, does that qualify as an 'internal inconsistency"?
Yes, he was willing to get himself lynched because he was convinced of Peter's guilt.
No, he was not willing to get himself lynched because he was convinced of my guilt.
You claimed the latter. You're also just spouting bullshit at this point.
You don't think you should give an update on your suspicions when you've pretty much attacked everyone today while accusingI will answer the points that I feel need comment. As I have done in my last two posts.meof spreading suspicion around?
You don't think you should substantiate your claim of a Peter/CTD scum-pair when all you came up with so far is that "it feels like CTD is distancing"?
You don't think you should explain your bizarre opinion that starting a counter-wagon on a townie is a good thing?
Then I'm more than happy to see you hang.
Mini 425 Generic Western Mafia- Game over!
-
-
Lateralus Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 55
- Joined: June 24, 2007
- Location: GI, Nebraska
Woah Danger-
-
Lateralus Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 55
- Joined: June 24, 2007
- Location: GI, Nebraska
-
-
Lateralus Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 55
- Joined: June 24, 2007
- Location: GI, Nebraska
-
-
Lateralus Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 55
- Joined: June 24, 2007
- Location: GI, Nebraska
peter looks the most odd to me.... but im not gonna clarify anything just yet im gonna sit back and see what the others say first ill get in more comments as soon as i see more reasonable posts.
*******************************************
Day 2, Sixth official vote count:
Paradoxombie (2): gorckat, mustafa15
DeathSauce (2): CrashTextDummie, Thesp
Raffles (1): Peter Venkman
CrashTextDummue (1): DeathSauce
Not voting: TeamQuiggan, Paradoxombie, Occult, Raffles
10 alive, 6 to lynch.Woah Danger-
-
Lateralus Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 55
- Joined: June 24, 2007
- Location: GI, Nebraska
-
-
Lateralus Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 55
- Joined: June 24, 2007
- Location: GI, Nebraska
-
-
Lateralus Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 55
- Joined: June 24, 2007
- Location: GI, Nebraska
-
-
Lateralus Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 55
- Joined: June 24, 2007
- Location: GI, Nebraska
-
-
Lateralus Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 55
- Joined: June 24, 2007
- Location: GI, Nebraska
-
-
Lateralus Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 55
- Joined: June 24, 2007
- Location: GI, Nebraska
-
-
Lateralus Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 55
- Joined: June 24, 2007
- Location: GI, Nebraska
-
-
Lateralus Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 55
- Joined: June 24, 2007
- Location: GI, Nebraska
-
-
Lateralus Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 55
- Joined: June 24, 2007
- Location: GI, Nebraska
I know this sounds odd cause he just kind of defended me, but I know for positive Xombie is innocent. im telling the best i can without giving away my role. xombie has made some good points against Gorckrat and as has Gorckrat and SSF against xombie. also those are the only two people who voted against xombie and it seems like (other the Occult with a maybe vote) theyre the only two that are trying to fit the noose around xombie.Woah Danger-
-
Lateralus Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 55
- Joined: June 24, 2007
- Location: GI, Nebraska
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.