Mini 455 - Mafia in Theoville - Game Over who won?
-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
Seems like you're getting a bit desperate.NanookTheWolf wrote:Guardian wrote:YogurtBandit, by yours, do you mean ChaosOmega's? Or do you mean Ertomachia's vote on ChaosOmega?
Nanook, the logic "if you are random voting, then say so" can most definitely be applied to Streeflo, but I did mean for it to apply to ChaosOmega's posts at the time.Unvote: Streeflo, Vote: Guardian... Better?
I dunno about the rest of you, but so far Nanook seems like the scummiest player in the game.-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
I've been confused as to where this whole "cop roleclaim" thing came from, so I read back through the thread and found this, the post where it all began?
Excuse me, but, WTF? It seems like Nanook is reading into things a bitNanookTheWolf wrote:
Originally, I thought to myself that Guardian was completely foolish for doing such a thing on the first page of this game .. I don't know why people think it's a great Idea to claim something so early on, especially the supposed 'cop'.Guardian wrote:Coultn't sleep at all, so I thought I'd post.Often, ChaosOmega, new scum will just vote without saying anything, like you did.People might get suspicious of you for that (I am a wee bit); I think it's better to just say that your vote is random in the future so people don't have a reason to jump on. My 1/50 of a dollar .toomuch. I still think Nanook and Gaurdian are both mafia. Nanook's "ousting" of Gaurdian as an important pro-town role (to help ensure his survival) ties into their voting together. Nanook's looking scummer by the minute. (Or hour, whatever.)-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
Okay, that just doesn't sound right. You're asking someone to act like scum. If they oblige, you will have the perfect opportunity to pounce on them and declare them scum. No matter what he does, YL is losing. Adel's atop my "scummiest" list now, with Nanook coming in at a close second.Do something scummy or I will be forced to think you are scum.
Unvote: Nanookthewolf
Vote: Adel
Sorry about not posting often. I check the thread constantly, but most of the time have nothing significant to contribute.[url]http://www.youtube.com/nanosauromo[/url]-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
Seems like Adel is rushing to end the day.Adel wrote:12 pages in 7 days so far... will we need more than 24 pages to lynch someone? It is just a mini.
Could the rest of the town please vote? If someone gets to -3 or -2 to lynch, then don't, but we can at least use our votes to pressure some content out of those we consider may be scum.-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
EBWODP: Arg, bloody quote tags!
dogmom wrote: then pops in to change his vote, with virtually no input.
Okay, I'll explain my actions then.
In the beginning, Nanookthewolf simply seemed scummy because he voted along with Gaurdian, following Gaurdian's "logic" but not explaining what this "logic" was. For a while, he seemed like the scummiest guy around, and thus I kept my vote on him.
But then Adel came along. His catch-22 of "Do something scummy or I will be forced to think you are scum." tipped off my scum detector. He now seemed more scummy than Nanook. He was now my prime candidate for a lynch. His pressuring of people to vote quickly reinforced my belief.
With that said, Theo, can we get a vote count?
yeh sure, give me ten mins. I deleted your previous duplicated post-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
Gaurdian's leaning towards scum, due to the scummy Nanook following his lead. I'm not familiar with breadcrumbing, but it seems like he started doing it way too early.
As for Yogurt (one of my favorite words, BTW), I haven't formed a clear opinion on him yet.[url]http://www.youtube.com/nanosauromo[/url]-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
I think we have more than two candidates already. Or are you just trying to buy time for yourself?Adel wrote:New tactic:
Debating the merits of the cases against two good candidates will generate lots of information for later analysis, and act as a quality assurance check. Support of this tactic will require a deadline extension.Do not lynch until there aretwoprobable candidates, each with about enough support to lynch. This will force players to take a pretty serious position on two players, which will be good information regardless of the results of investigations and the eventual lynch
Mod: respectfully request deadline extension-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
I kept my vote on you because nobody was acting particularly scummy; you were simply the least non-scummy player (If that makes any sense). There was no-one to change to, so I kept it on you. By the time Adel's scumminess was accumulating, any negative opinions I had about you had mostly withered away. Thus, the change.NanookTheWolf wrote:
I'm going to do something with my vote which I thought I already had, but for whatever reason the post isn't there .. hmm.Nanosauromo wrote:EBWODP: Arg, bloody quote tags!
dogmom wrote: then pops in to change his vote, with virtually no input.
Okay, I'll explain my actions then.
In the beginning, Nanookthewolf simply seemed scummy because he voted along with Gaurdian, following Gaurdian's "logic" but not explaining what this "logic" was. For a while, he seemed like the scummiest guy around, and thus I kept my vote on him.
But then Adel came along. His catch-22 of"Do something scummy or I will be forced to think you are scum."tipped off my scum detector. He now seemed more scummy than Nanook. He was now my prime candidate for a lynch. His pressuring of people to vote quickly reinforced my belief.
With that said, Theo, can we get a vote count?
yeh sure, give me ten mins. I deleted your previous duplicated post
Vote: Nanosauromo
I'm voting for you based on your reasoning placed against Adel. I find it hard to believe that for as long as you've been pressing for a lynch against myself and how you've felt about Guardian that the above underlined quote from Adel made you change your mind so easily. I don't want to have your vote placed back onto me obviously, but how could something that I would normally take as a light matter, seem to so easily change your mind on who you find most likely scum?
I just think that you believe that Adel would be an easier lynch, hence why you changed your strategy is all.-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
You've not done anything really scummy except in the beginning of the game. ("Following Gaurdian's logic" when there was no real logic to be found.)NanookTheWolf wrote:How the guy (NanoS), can change within a day like that is still baffling to me. Also, explain the not scummy portion of your post regarding me pls Nano.-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
Okay, time for the list of scummy Adel quotes:
This just provides more information for the scum, while distracting people from discussion of the lynch.Adel wrote:Here is another crazy idea I just thought of: In addition to or regular vote in the regular format we also postVigKill: Player ZZZZZandun:Vigkill. Based on the games I've read, 50-75% of these games have a vig, but they usually don't do much good, killing townies or not killing at all.
See the too townie Fallacy / Catch-22.Adel wrote:YagamiLight gets another special notice for being almost perfectly non-scummy, which I am beginning to think is a scum tell. Do something scummy or I will be forced to think you are scum.
Rushing the town to vote is bad.Adel wrote:12 pages in 7 days so far... will we need more than 24 pages to lynch someone? It is just a mini.
Could the rest of the town please vote? If someone gets to -3 or -2 to lynch, then don't, but we can at least use our votes to pressure some content out of those we consider may be scum.
Yet you've already listed several scumm candidates, including Nanook, ChaosOmega, YL, and myself.Adel wrote:Do not lynch until there aretwoprobable candidates, each with about enough support to lynch. This will force players to take a pretty serious position on two players, which will be good information regardless of the results of investigations and the eventual lynch.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That just about sums it up.-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
That's a WIFOM, am I right?adel wrote:This was a little tounge-in-cheek, and a little zen, and widely misunderstood. I would expect the superior scum player to maintain a low profile and drop zero or nearly zero scum tells through careful and conservative posting. YL fits that profile. I get the wiki article, and I could deconstruct it as being the work of two specific players who can be called out by that argument, but I do not know for sure that is true. Be weary of the wiki, it is not the Bible, and anything in it can be meta-gamed is people take it too seriously. Be skeptical. I am skeptical of my own judgment, because I am familiar with my capacity to be wrong. In my opinion, YL is the least scummy player, and I have said that in a couple of other posts, both before and after the post in question. Since I see YL as the least scummy, I am weary of YL. That is how my mind works, and I was trying to share what I saw as being a possibly valuable insight. Take it or leave it, but it is not a reason to indite.[url]http://www.youtube.com/nanosauromo[/url]-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
OMGUS?Battle Mage wrote:
gtfo lol. Im here, but i have RL stuff to deal with atm.MeMe wrote:You haven't "go[ne] away for a matter of months" -- you're all over the site. Quit pretending you don't have time and play this game or get voted for ignoring it, simple as that.
Some people come here every day and post a load of BS, and think that makes them a contributing player.
In fairness, id much rather contribute something useful, even if it means waiting a couple of days.
Oh and while i am here,Vote: MeMe
there is literally no reason for MeMe-town to take that sort of attitude. Opportunistic scum-MeMe must be here instead.-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
And what exactly is scummy about that?Guardian wrote:However, NanoS is also lookingveryscummy for:Nanosauromo wrote:
Yes, but I need to gather more evidence before I can continue my case against her.NanoS, do you still find Adel scummy?
Perhaps she's Mafia and BM is a Serial Killer. (Or vice versa)If so, why do you think she is pushing for BM votes?-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
-
-
Nanosauromo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 260
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: California
Why the hell can't you get that I don't see anything remotely scummy about that post? Maybe if you freaking told me what was scummy about it I'd understand!ChaosOmega wrote:
I understand your reasoning, but saying someone is useful to the town is a weird preface to voting for them. As of right now, I think Nanosauromo and Adel are the two scummiest players, for different reasons.Battle Mage wrote:We have Adel, who posts a lot of content, and is actually useful to the town. ... so, Vote: Adel
Adel has been posting a lot of things that have sounded suspicious. She's also been posting a lot of things period. Nanosauromo, on the other hand, posts nowhere near as much, and a lot of his latest posts have not been very useful. Look at his last 3 posts:
Nanosauromo wrote:And what exactly is scummy about that?Nanosauromo wrote:No, I honestyl don't understand why Gaurdian thinks that quote is scummy.
Are you just faking confusion so you don't have to answer anything? I would much rather lynch scum who don't post much content then scum who post a lot of content. So I'm going toNanosauromo wrote:No, I can't. What is so suspicious about it?unvote, mainly to cause separation and make it less likely for a no-lynch to occur.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.