Mini 430: Villagers and Vampires (GAME OVER!)

Chaosjuggler · Post Post #8 (isolation #0) » Sat Apr 07, 2007 10:28 pm

I'll confirm.

Chaosjuggler · Post Post #28 (isolation #1) » Wed Apr 11, 2007 5:40 pm

Vote Zchinque

for replacing.

Chaosjuggler · Post Post #75 (isolation #2) » Tue Apr 24, 2007 11:14 pm

I have been prodded. I am here. Sorry about the inactivity.

Yesterdays, explain yourself. That was a very scummy post, in my opinion, and a mislynch of a town is not as detrimental now as the possible lynch of the vampire- especially now you're posting like this.

Also,

Unvote

my randomvote.

Chaosjuggler · Post Post #91 (isolation #3) » Sat Apr 28, 2007 10:22 pm

It's not going to go anywhere, in my opinion. I think Aude is arguably the most town out of anyone at the moment, as he has been actively working for the town; even if he was advocating something that noone else agrees with, I think that his logic has been consistent all game.

Chaosjuggler · Post Post #108 (isolation #4) » Sat May 05, 2007 1:13 am

I agree with Shanba; it gives a scum supposed "integrity" as if they lynch a town, they can say "Oh, but [so-andso] told me to!" or the like. It is quite scummy, IMO.

Chaosjuggler · Post Post #114 (isolation #5) » Sun May 06, 2007 3:00 pm

Remember that in this game, there is no such thing as a quicklynch, at least on day 1. Since there is only 1 scum, someone needs to be on lynch -1 to be quicklynched- and then the person who quicklynched will get lynched the next day, thus winning the game for town.

Chaosjuggler · Post Post #131 (isolation #6) » Sat May 12, 2007 12:43 pm

Agree with Phoebus on this one too - sure, we might lose two members to the Vamp, but tomorrow we can look for connections, and the chance of nailing the vamp is worth the risk.

No votes; sure, Zchnique's post was scummy, but was it regular scum-misplay scummy, or "over-the-top" scummy?