Open 10 -- C9: Game Over! - before 400
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
Possibly wifomish. (Only possibly though, I agree that IH scum could choose easier targets.)Patrick wrote:Hmm yeah weird move by IH. Not necessarily scummy as I usually see IH in my minds eye going for the easier targets as scum
Metagaming. I don't think IH can be metagamed. I've played many games with him and I can't say he has a consistent playstyle.Ripley wrote:Actually I've seen this in other games lately, IH making posts that are hard to understand and being wildly incoherent and voting for what seem like absurd reasons, and in one at least he turned out to be town.
Clarification: Just pointing out flaws in the argument here, I don't really think IH is that scummy at the moment.Blank.-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
I get where the 2 of you are coming from. I still disagree. I am not referring only to the newbie game. Probably the difference is I've played with IH in almost every game he's played here, and I've seen him as town, as scum, and as a whole lot of other roles. If I remember correctly, we've also been scum buddies/masons or some kind of 'group' roles. I take notes on players I've played more than a handful of games with, and he's inconsistent.Blank.-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
Nope, I still buy the claim. Testable claims = good. Contrary to what Ripley said, I've never doubted it. The confusion arose because I thought CES was saying I'd presented a case for an IH/Ripley scum group (178), so I clarified to say I hadn't. My posts were also only a minute apart because I skimmed through the previous pages to refresh my memory.
Complete wifoming here, but scum would probably have unloaded the heavy guns on either IH or Ripley, since the 3 of us are on the hot seat.
I'll do a PBPA on the 2 sometime tomorrow.Blank.-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
It's an innocent townie mistake.
1.34 amspectrumvoid wrote:I don't think IH and Ripley are a scum group.
The only thing I've said about IH is I didn't understand his posts. The only thing I said about Ripley is that meta-gaming = bad. Where did you get this idea from?
1.35 am.spectrumvoid wrote:Oh. I know... I forgot CDB's claim and your innocence.
I need to go do a read then.
Again, I reiterate that the posts were only 1 min apart. I took a reread of the thread since we're in lyol. I still buy the claim.
Note that Ripley's 90% 10% assessment is rather obviously heavily weighted in his favour. Since I've stated believe the claim, he'll have a hard time convincing me to disbelieve it (I believe that's where he's 'backtracking' bit comes from.) So he has no choice but to go after SV/IH scumpair.
I'll go do a PBPA on IH then since CDB and IH have already promised a PBPA on Ripley and have yet to deliver.Blank.-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
-
-
spectrumvoid Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Problem Child
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: June 9, 2006
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.