@TIO: Actually, as you just quoted, "of those most involved". Not "of those posting walls", and there's no way you could think that only those three were involved. I'm also really not liking how you took that opportunity to bandwagon.
Jase wrote:Me=Weird wrote:I initially suspected RotN for completely non-contributing, plus (lack of) interactions from C-worl, and setael hasn't changed that.
Me=Weird wrote:@jase: Setael because I found it scummy how the other members of her slot didn't contribute, and because she hasn't done much anything to change that.
You DID say both of those things. Right here in this sentence that I quoted right above In the post you just responded to, and in this earlier post. Not, "I don't like/agree with her contribution' but "No contribution" is clearly what you said.
Yeah, you say that the slot previously did not contribute, and had suspicious interaction with c-worl. You then say "and setael hasn't changed that." The first part is clearly wrong and the second part doesn't make sense.
If by first part you mean that other slot members didn't contribute, that's totally true, if by first part you mean that whole sentence, then not only is the first part of that sentence true, but I do consider the lack of interactions
from
c-worl scummy. By second part, I assume you mean "and setael didn't change that", I did not mean that setael hasn't changed the no contributions, which is what I think you think I mean, but that setael hasn't changed my scumread of here.
I also don't like the attempt to discredit my case. As it is just as wrong as the thing I first called you out for. Not only that but you're backpedaling. Saying I never said "X" when you clearly did, or trying to spin things in a more favorable light.
I attacked your case because it didn't look there was much of a case, now I realize you misunderstood. More on this later.
Also, could you explain the bit about "She could be bussing" ?
I'm not sure how that relates to what I said.
That was about how part of her case could be genuine, but bussing. Assuming of course that I'm right.
Recap: Your case is that I said setael hasn't contributed, which is a lie, that now I'm saying I never said that, and I think something about how interactions with c-worl is wrong.
What's true: I never said setael hasn't contributed. When I said "setael hasn't changed that", I'm talking about setael not changed my scum-read,
not
setael hasn't changed the no contributing. So it's true that I never said that, although looking back, I can sort of see how you could think that because of poor sentence structure. Next, about c-worl interactions, what I'm saying is this: I find it scummy how C-worl failed to interact with setaels slot.
Uncle pain: I meant that if deadline came up, I'd be willing to switch to cp to avoid a no-lynch, which I'd still do but now find it unlikely that that's going to be necessary. Also, that was before the deadline extension, when deadliine was drawing near with no leading wagon. Now that pine's here, I guess my read is slightly leaning town.
Again, I when I wrote "setael hasn't changed that", I was solely talking about her not changing my read.