Sheesh.
Methinks thou dost protest too much
@Spyre: Protest what exactly? He voted without posting a word of reason which isn't excusable even in the RVS and then turns it into some sort of terrible gambit when he gets called out on it. Oh, and it's drawing votes away from GHP who he throws a weak FOS at to distance with.
Vote: RichGHP
RVS shouldn't be so literal.Why?Lol.Haha guessing, fine. "DERP DERP NO EXPLANATION VOTE OMG SOMEONE QUESTIONED ME DEFENDING SCUM HERP LOLOLOL"
That pretty much sums it up yes?Scum team to the rescue with a counterwagon!
GHP is as good a push as any at this point in the game, at the beginning you have little to no evidence on anyone.
That second quote is an awesome one under the guise of "little to no evidence". Considering, to make said statement: Richard would be scum AND at least one of: Substrike, jmurph3, masflooh, and well, Richard are scum. (If one wants to get banal, its really two of the latter because the scum 'team' has come to the rescue).Scum team to the rescue with a counterwagon!
1.) Having your iso there illustrates the point better than any words can. If I need to get the diagrams out for those still trying to see what was going on well sure but thats some wasted effort sooo.You're quotes are pointless when it's essentially the whole ISO (5/6 post-start posts) with zero explanation. Post 50 was hyperbole if you want to get technical, the point was focused at mahfloo and OMGUS from GHP. "Little to no" doesn't mean zero either, Richard and mahfloogsfaslk are the best bet right now in my opinion, so I'm voting them and laying out some points. If you want to sit around and wait til page 10 to start I'll just back off and we can twiddle our thumbs and not generate any info.
Sooo, it actually wasn't hyperbole in 50 then?@Spyre: I'd pick the second one obviously. Your question was loaded because it was so black and white so I was trying to explain why there could be enough information to warrant that view.
Ohh SNAP I missed that.Jmurph, for posts like #184 and #197, where he calls SpyreX his top suspect and then proceeds to vote for his top suspect's top suspect.
<3Of course. I wouldn't have voted otherwise.
Except that if you actually read post 184, that's not at all what I said. I said that at that moment, of the people on the wagon I'd be most willing to vote Spyrex - not, mind you, that he was my top suspect, as there is a difference. I also ended my post by saying,
In the meantime, however, i need to reread the thread and work out some reads on those that I have sort of null-tells on at the moment.
There be an issue rollin' around right har'.Why, guess what...I reread the thread and decided that Istilldidn't like the way Shotty was/is playing. So really nice job taking what I said completely out of context.
This set of posts:SpyreX, why is FakeGod creeping you out?
so Richard didn't claim when he was about to die?
*shrug*
I guess he wanted to be lynched.
Should we lynch inside the wagon or the outside?
If we assume 2 scum on cop wagon and 1 scum outside, that gives us about 2/7 nailing scum inside the wagon, and 1/3 nailing scum outside the wagon.
The vote doesn't bother me inherently. Its the absence of ever even pretending to say I'm scum. And, the statistics from playing on the wagon are skitchy.Vote: SpyreX
As you wish.
Following a theme.Meh let's do this. Going to have to stick with my gut at this point. Spyre's all or nothing attitude towards this isn't helpful in the least, he quick hammered, and his massive tunneling certainly isn't pro-town.
vote Spyre
@Reck: You said earlier you thought you knew Richard's buddy back on D1, who were you thinking of then? Why did you not mention Jmurph at all?
And yesterday never existed.Lol pretty sure you voted me today after I said I suspected you earlier. Just sayin'.
One time.Why does it matter? I have a vote on him, I've been actively mentioning hisscummy/anti-town-ness since at least the beginning of the day. Actions speak louder than words. I don't think I've seen you call me scum, what's up bro?
Yea, sometimes it is:mas wrote: These reasons for hammering Richard don't make any sense at all. 1 and 2 are things that occurred before you actually hammered Richard. Once Richard and nachomamma reacted to the threat you had accomplished those goals. So, why did you still need to hammer? 3 is a terrible reason. Is adding spice to the game more important than having role claims and a day longer than 6 pages? No, it isn't.
He's not doin much, but he's done one awesome thing.Also, Nacho, do something.
If I say I'm going to hammer you it's pretty much implied if you've got anything to dissuade said hammer, like claiming cop for example, one should do this and sure as hell not twirl around.mas wrote:Why didn't you ask for a claim before hammering?
The short end of the dead list. Unlike the reckamachine I think mas is town. CES and FG are for killin@SpyreX - what do you think of CES's play?
We are hesitant to move on from CES but we are getting nowhere without some backup or support.
Fair enough. Words are tricky bastards.Did you not pay attention to anything I said D1, where I pretty much focused on Shotty the entire time? My saying that I still don't like Shotty was a reference to D1, wherein I didn't like Shotty's play. After D1 was over, I was focused more on the hammer (i.e. Spyrex and, to some extent, Nacho), casting pretty much everyone else into the realm of nulltells. When I reread, I remembered how I felt and I realized that not much had changed on that front. So I voted him.
Damnit nacho you know better than that.No, not at all.
10/12 alive isn't typical LyLo in the mini normal's I've played in.
Dude, dude.Well, let's see. When someone is being replaced, it means that we're going to get a fresh new set of eyes on the game that might see something we've missed. I don't trust people's play when they end up flaking because it means they really don't care about the game they're playing so despite what alignment they are, they're not playing to their wincon like everyone else is. It also means that you AREN'T going to get a claim, and honestly, I have not seen a case out of you on Shotty that warrants enough confidence to lynch without a claim.
See this post?Unvote. Vote: FakeGod
I don't want to lynch somebody getting replaced, and FakeGod's the only alternative and the one I would prefer to see lynched anyway.
What was stupid?Actually hell, screw it. Nacho is hitting a few of his minor town tells depsite of the stupid move regarding RGHP.
I dig, I just was eye-raised at "without a claim" like that matters when BUSINESS is going down.Spy? We told him we would hammer him, and most people claim when someone tells them they've gotten an intent to hammer. Richard wasn't getting replaced; we still had him around for reactions when we were discussing quickhammering him, and we saw firsthand his apathy. Shotty is GONE. He's flaked, disappeared, dead, MIA, not here... he couldn't claim if he wanted to.
Jmurph is wildcard.What is your thought on jmurph though at this point? Im moving on from Nacho-scum to nacho-townish due to all his minor tells he is hitting as of late. Plus the fact that jmurph needing death is an essential at this point. I just realized how disjointed this paragraph is so I will just say nacho be town leaning and jmurph be scum, undisjointification go.
Show some of this happening anywhere.regardless, I don't see much "meat" in your case against me, because I like to analyze voting patterns/theorize where the scumvotes would be, etc. when I'm scumhunting.
Uhhh.Though if Mas ends up flipping town-aligned, I suggest we take a closer look at CB. I find it a bit suspicious that there'd be a tracker, a cop, and a JOAT in the same game. Bit too investigative-heavy for me (or else Charlie's having a laugh over this )