podium123456 wrote:- he claims to do an ISO to determine which of us is scummy... yet leaves out a very influential portion associated with your role. i question him about it, and he dismisses it as if it was meaningless.
I never figured out what was so scummy about Dr P posting mostly meaningless garbage in the first place, so that's a non-issue for me.
- he has said multiple times that i argued against UT being scum all game. yet, earlier he described a post in which i 'implied UT was scummy'. this is actually a pretty big contradiction.
But you didn't just imply UT was scummy, you said the same about several other players and without following up on it at all.
- besides the fact that he contradicted himself, it's a lie to say that i defended UT. i clearly didn't, at any point in this game.
Yeah it would be more accurate to say that you ignored him for most of the time.
- why did my insistence of lynching you on D1 without more claims mean that we weren't partners? that isn't a logical conclusion... as we could have easily been bussing.
Obviously it is the right conclusion anyway. Whether something looks like bussing or like scum wanting to get a mislynch is always going to be a subjective call. If, instead of Taz, we'd have a fourth player here I'd be delighted to hear what he thinks about this particular point as I'm obviously predisposed by knowing we're not buddies...
We've had 2 days (3 if u count today i guess) of activity... on one of those days i led the charge, on the other i voted after others had (like LMP did).
So by "you lead the charge" you mean on Dr P? I'm really not following what you are trying to say you did.
Why does the second day count more than the first, and why isn't LMP following the crowd as well? I wouldn't say that he is, but i'm using the same standards that people are putting on me.
That's what I tried to say - he had been very clear what he thought of UT. One could say he lead the charge...
In the second, i didn't 'merely notice that he seems to be the big target'... i repeated my question, and with more detail.
I wrote that from memory, you are right that you did repeat the question there. I figure it didn't stick because it just doesn't sound particularly engaged. The way the post is phrased I get the impression that maybe you wouldn't have repeated it had nobody given a shit about Zod.
I see. So you believe even though UT hammered before the claim, that i said "what a mess of a game" right after he did, and that i had previously criticized 2 different players for doing such... that i didn't have a problem with his hammer.
Really?
I'm just missing this "UT is so scum for that hammer" post. Instead he's the low hanging fruit and, oh well Taz's claim makes him town, so he kinda must be scum, right.